Blog

LATEST – My FATHER’S WAR

FOREWORD:

American news anchor Tom Brokaw’s 1998 book ” The Greatest Generation ”  popularized this term for the generation who enlisted in World War Two.

“It is, I believe, the greatest generation any society has ever produced.” Brokaw argued that these men and women fought not for fame and recognition, but because it was “the right thing to do.”

My father, whose formative years spanned The Great War and The Depression,  was a member of “the greatest generation”. Like countless others he made a contribution to the war that saved Europe from Fascism.

I have written this memoir not only to honor my father, but to honor all those who flew in World War Two, and all who fly today.  My father loved to fly, as you will see.  Through an account of his career, I offer a window on Royal Air Force life between 1930 and 1955, a crucial time in its history, and  a portrait of an era that shaped the value system of the greatest generation.

CHAPTER ONE

My father taught me to swim when I was four. Here, in a picture taken by his younger brother Lloyd, we are leaving the shore of the Libyan coast outside Tripoli where my father commanded the RAF Base, Castel Benito. I was blessed with great parents who encouraged me in their different ways towards a life of fulfillment.

Eric Trenchard-Smith was born on June 15, 1910 in Australia, which had only four years before became a self-governing Dominion in the British Empire. While the new nation was sovereign in its domestic affairs, the United Kingdom maintained control over its relations with the wider world. Initially young Eric grew up in Manly, a coastal suburb of Sydney, in the east coast state of New South Wales.

This was the Manly Beachfront, where he first learned to swim and body surf. In the age before television and smart phones, the great outdoors was where kids entertained themselves.

Sixty years later, I would stage major scenes from “BMX BANDITS” all over Manly and the Northern Beaches in a private homage to my father’s birthplace, where his sense of adventure was formed.

Eric was the third of four boys born to Ethel and Oliver Trenchard-Smith, His father was a commercial traveller for Potter & Burke, a pharmaceutical company that represented Johnson & Johnson products. His salesmanship was impressive enough for the company to appoint him their New Zealand Manager, resulting in the family moving to Auckland when Eric was 12. The same year Eric contracted respiratory diphtheria. Sore throat, barking cough, swelling, made it Australia’s highest cause of infant mortality in the pre-vaccination 1920. As my father’s breathing difficulties became more severe, the family consented to a potentially risky procedure at the time – a tracheotomy, an incision in the throat providing a direct airway to the windpipe. I’m sure the experience had its impact on my father’s development. What does not kill you makes you stronger.

World War One, while tragically high in Australian (62K) and New Zealand (18K) casualties, had nonetheless been a boon for the Dominion’s rapid economic growth. Consequently, middle class income in 1922’s Auckland provided a good standard of living, particularly for a company senior management executive. The Trenchard-Smith family bought a house in Epsom with a view of Mount Eden a mile away, and an adjacent clay tennis court where Eric learned a future social skill. The family raised White Leghorn chickens, and had an orchard of fruit trees; the boys had their toast spread with jam made from apples, guavas, nectarines, peaches, figs. There was also a walnut tree and a tomato tree. The home, as described my uncle Lloyd’s memoir, had an Angelus brand Pianola in the “sitting room” and a wind-up gramophone wired to a speaker on the large back verandah. The brothers could play Vitaphone dance records when friends came over. In the dining room, there was a six valve “wireless set”. Radio reception was not good till brother Ray and his father built an outside “aerial”. Two thirty foot timber poles were connected by a “scarf joint”, creating a sixty foot mast, the requisite height for reception. which was then embedded upright in the back lawn. Four cables tethered it to the ground. The radio had clarity thereafter. I admire the problem solving ingenuity of past generations.
The boys often walked 4 miles to school. Oldest son Ray was soon at University, youngest son Lloyd became his mother’s focus of attention, middle brothers Oliver Junior and Eric had permission to roam in the adjacent bushland by themselves taking a bag of food, ” a tucker bag”, and camp out for a night or two. Self-sufficiency and adventure was encouraged.

Potter & Birks’ business in prospered, enabling Oliver Trenchard-Smith to buy their first family car, not the one shown, but an equivalent brand new 1923 six cylinder five seater Buick with folding hood. Horse drawn transportation was the norm, as were bicycles and motor cycles with side cars. Cars were the province of the well to do. I cannot find an accurate sale price for a 1923 Buick but it could well have been half a year’s salary. I suspect Potter & Birks provided the vehicle for their chief sales representative in New Zealand within a year of his arrival, something Oliver Trenchard-Smith probably negotiated as a bonus for taking his family to Auckland, a city less developed than Sydney, Australia. Many along the Trenchard genealogical line dating from the 1100’s have displayed a flair for negotiation; thereby gaining wealth, avoiding execution, etc. Perhaps it’s in the DNA.

From 1925 owners had to register their motor vehicles. Soon there were more than 150,000 on the road. New Zealand had one car for every 10 people, second only to the US, and ahead of Australia and Britain, a reflection of the country’s rapidly developing prosperity.. At the age of 13, when his father was away, Eric taught not just himself but also his mother to drive. Licenses and road safety regulations were not introduced in New Zealand for another two years. His mother provided piano lessons for Eric who showed some aptitude although it was discouraged by his father as being an “unmanly” pursuit. My grandfather was by repute a difficult man, He would come home from weeks of business travel tired and expect calm and relaxation in the household. The two middle brothers were rambunctious teenagers. My grandfather beat Eric with a leather belt at age 12 for some act of defiance, according to his younger brother Lloyd, who overheard the encounter in the next room. According to my uncle Lloyd:
“Eric was the strong willed naughty brother and received many beatings from my father. My brother Ollie was gentle by nature. Eldest brother Ray was often the peacemaker when he thought my father was being a bit unreasonable towards Eric or Ollie.” Spare the rod, spoil the child was part of parenting culture in those days. but it did not take root with my father, who resolved disciplinary issues without ever raising a hand to me. Thus, he broke the cycle of corporal punishment embraced by his own father and generations before him.

My grandfather’s politics was politically conservative. anti- communist and racist. In his will he stipulated the disinheritance of any of his children who married a communist, a Jew, or member of the African or Asian races. This became an issue many years later when Oliver Trenchard-Smith’s second son Oliver Jnr. wanted to marry Renata Rebane, an emigre from Estonia. My uncle Oliver had a difficult time convincing his father that Renata, as a 14 year old had fled from the bloody Russian invasion of Estonia, and was therefore not a communist. But he prevailed. In 1966, I visited my aunt Renata and her 90 year old mother in Sydney. She told me of walking home through the fields from school one day past the bodies of people shot from a passing train. The White Russian/Red Russian War of 1918 -22 is a fascinating and neglected slice of geo-political history, hopefully to be explored in large scale streaming series, as History should. In that visit my father and I met Michael Romanoff, a purported Romanov cousin and leader of the White Russian community in Sydney, who had embraced Australian life. We body surfed with him after a picnic on Bondi Beach. Like Renata, he had lived through interesting times. Passions ran high. I include this White Russian propaganda poster because, well, I find propaganda art interesting. It can reveal more about the propagandists than they realize.

My grandfather wanted his son, who had a flair for computation, to train for 5 years as an articled clerk, then work for him as an accountant. This was not the life young Eric had dreamed of.

My father was a life long bird watcher, often taking field glasses on walks. There was something about the wonder of flight that fascinated him. To be the master of a machine that can emulate a bird, to be no longer earthbound, was an appealing concept to adventurous young men, and probably a greater reason for my father to apply to join the RAF than to avoid working for his father, with whom he “did not get along.” I did get along with my father, particularly from the age of 13, when I began discussing what I might do with my life when I left school. His advice to me was to find something I loved doing and get paid for it; advice I took. The nub of it was: follow your passion.My father had decided his passion was aviation, the new game changing development in transportation, barely a generation old. During the 1920’s, Australia, a continent 3000 miles from coast to coast, was obsessed with “Those Magnificent Men and Their Flying Machines.” Cinema Newsreels proudly featured the latest planes to an audience that “went to the pictures” once a week.

Aviation pioneers became celebrities. Sir Charles Kingsford-Smith became a household name after completing the world’s first trans-Pacific flight with Charles Ulm from America to Australia in 1928, an event recreated in the 1946 movie “Smithy”, or “Pacific Adventure” in the United States.

Sir Charles Kingsford-Smith and Charles Ulm standing next to their plane upon arrival in England in 1929. (National Library of Australia)

I know my father saw the 1927 Academy Award winning silent movie Wings, which contained the most elaborate aerial combat sequences yet filmed. This UTube clip, (with added music and sound effects) shows how how the young men of Australia and New Zealand were first introduced to warfare in the skies.

A tournament of Knights, challenging gravity and the laws of physics. Hard to resist. But it was not the adrenalin rush of warfare that my father sought.
It was the joy of flight.

The Royal Australian Air Force had few planes and little need for recruits. But Britain did. In 1930, the British government, anticipating the hostilities ahead. offered short service commissions to volunteers from Commonwealth countries. Successful applicants would be trained for 3 years, receive a King’s Commission and return to their respective countries, Thus a talent pool of experienced pilots would be available to recall if the threat from Germany became real.
Thinking ahead, my father had, in his late teens enhanced his resume by volunteering while at university for the New Zealand Army, training part time as a bombardier with the 4th Field Howitzer Battery. When the Royal Air Force called for Commonwealth volunteers, Eric told his father that he wished to serve his country (Australians and New Zealanders at that time often referred to England as the Mother Country.) and join the RAF in the UK. He persuaded his father he would return in three years when his short service commission ended. How could a conservative anti-communist father stand in the way of his son’s sense of patriotic duty? My father applied, citing his brief military service, sailed to England in 1930 and was accepted. Listed as Smith, he is standing third from the right at the end of his first term at RAF Cranwell College Flying School.

As it turned out, he did not return to Australia after his short service commission expired. His rating as a pilot was listed as “exceptional”. He was given a full commission in the Royal Air Force and served for 25 years., reaching the rank of Wing Commander. His service record reveals a quiet achiever who successfully handled a variety of challenging assignments. He did not think he did anything remarkable. He just did his duty as best he could.As did the vast majority of the Greatest Generation.

FLIGHT

My father and I enjoyed Those Magnificent Men on a giant screen of the Odeon, Leicester Square. As was commercially sensible for a big budget holiday season attraction, the movie played pioneer aviation for comedy.
In reality, flying a century ago was a hazardous business, and all those that undertook it knew the risks. It must have taken blind faith and a special kind of courage an to entrust your life to canvas stretched over a wooden framework, held together with wire, string. and a great deal of glue; but that was what the pioneer pilots were working with when war broke out in 1914, and aerial combat was developed.. Casualty rates were high. Below is a restored Sopwith Camel, Britain’s most successful WW1. fighter. It was credited with downing 1,294 enemy aircraft, more than any other Allied fighter in the conflict. A brief digression into the Camel’s unique characteristics will illuminate the range of risks pilots faced when they took to the air.

In the hands of an experienced pilot, the Camel was highly maneuverable, an essential quality in the relatively low-speed, low-altitude dogfights of the era. But she was quite challenging to fly, and especially during take off and landing,

This was an inevitable byproduct of the fighter’s design – critically small dimensions, high undercarriage, a narrow distance between the wheels; and notably the moving mass of the rotary engine. This affected the plane’s center of gravity, causing stalling or a fatal spin. In six months of 1917, more than a hundred accidents occurred involving Sopwith Camels, and thirty pilots were lost. Pilots who survived the severe flying school of the Western Front mastered the Camel’s eccentricities, and went on to become Aces.
1914 – 1918 were the infancy years of aerial combat. Pilots shooting at each other with pistols gave way to a gunner sitting behind the pilot with a Lewis gun on a swivel ring. He could only fire to the side, above or behind the aircraft, limiting options in a dogfight. What fighter pilots needed were guns that pointed at their targets as they pursued them. so twin machine guns were mounted in front of the cockpit, directly behind the propeller, shooting between the rotation of the propeller blades.

How, you may wonder, did the wooden propeller survive the fusillade of bullets? The solution was timing, as is demonstrated in glorious slow-motion by the Slo Mo Guys. At one minute fifteen seconds into their video, the Guys begin their demonstration.

OK. I’m going to get into the weeds here. While the video above is a joy to watch, it doesn’t touch on the real innovation behind what makes it work, the synchronization gear, which restricted the machine gun so it could only fire in between the propellers. This video gives a sense of the ingenious amalgam of wood, metal strut, and wire components involved in the Sopwith cockpit.

To take the risks involved, here, in the British currency of the day, is what the newly formed Royal Flying Corps paid their flying officers

Major: 32 shillings per day – Captain: 19 shillings, rising to 20 shillings per day after 1 year in the position + an additional 8 shillings per day flying pay
Lieutenant: 12 shillings per day + an additional 1 shilling per day for each completed year (up to a max of 16 shillings) +an additional 8 shillings per day flying pay; 2nd Lieutenant: 10 shillings a day + 8 shillings a day flying pay
Probationer: 7 shillings and sixpence a day plus 4 shillings flying pay

20 shillings made up a Pound Sterling.  In 1918, a family needed 225 Pounds a year to live on. By the time my father joined Cranwell College in 1930, wages for graduate pilot officers were not much higher than in 1918. But the College offered room and board and the prospect of promotion.

****

The Royal Flying Corps had become the Royal Air Force in 1924. Cranwell College was founded to train future pilots. When my father sailed from Sydney to England to start training there, he met a New Zealander on board with the same intention. Regrettably, on his first flight, there was a mechanical malfunction and the man was killed alongside his instructor.

The RAF Archives list more than 100 pilot fatalities in 1931, a dozen in flight training. This seems to be the accident referred to.

ANNING, Anthony Frederick Paul, F/O – Killed 13 February 1931 in an Atlas, Cranwell Cadet College; loss of speed on a gliding turn during approach for a practice forced landing. He was instructor.
ACTON-ADAMS, Arthur Moreland, New Zealander; Flight Cadet – Killed 13 February 1931 in an Atlas, Cranwell Cadet College; loss of speed on a gliding turn during approach for a practice forced landing.

Crash landings and collisions on the airfield were not uncommon as pilot training expanded beyond trainer experience. This luckless fellow caused both his plane and a hanger to burn down.

Below are the remains of an Armstrong Whitworth Atlas and an Avro Tutor after a fatal collision at No.3 Flying School, Grantham in June 1931.

MARKBY, Jack Eugene, F/O – Killed 30 October 1931 at Hucknall in a Tutor of No.3 Flying Training School, Grantham. Member of No.504 (County of Nottingham) Squadron. He was pilot of the aircraft.
McHARDY, Louis, F/O – Killed 30 October 1931 at Hucknall in a Tutor of No.3 Flying Training School, Grantham. Member of No.504 (County of Nottingham) Squadron.
The RAF Archives continues with reasons for this accident.
“When the machines were over the Squadron hangar one got into a bump and rocked from side to side. When the pilot found that he was underneath his leader’s machine he turned away and his top left plane caught the leader’s tail, causing it to fall off. The leader’s machine continued for a few seconds and then dived onto the aerodrome. It was twisted right round as a result of the collision. The jury returned a verdict of ‘accidental death’ and attached no blame to anyone.”

Flight report of court martial (issue of 20 February 1931) included the following:

“W/C R.D.G. Small said that the regulation about distance between machines flying in formation was very seldom carried out. It was much easier to fly in tight formation than at the correct distances and intervals. According to evidence, both machines got into bumps near a hangar. P/O Angell in his evidence said that he could not control his machine in the bump. He was not aware that there had been any impact until he landed. His machine was less than half a span away from the other. The court acquitted Angell after a brief retirement.”

Pilot Officer Angell, himself, aged 21, was killed a month later when his Siskin 111A hit a tree while low flying.

An RAF career had its perils, even in peacetime.
****

TRAINING TO FLY

For the first year, RAF Cranwell grounded the cadets in the fundamentals of aviation, combined with military life coaching, and a dash of college education.

Cadets were instructed in English language and literature; mathematics, engines and the theory of flight; mechanics and draughtsmanship; wood and metal work; elementary science; and the use of the wireless: map reading; military drill; PT; sanitation and hygiene. Here they are learning Morse Code.

The second year was when the cadets were taught to fly, including the use of a compass and machine gun while flying. The working day started at 6.45am, when the cadets were woken. There was a parade at 8am (even on Saturdays), after which the cadets marched off to lectures, workshops, drill or other activities until 12.30. From 2pm until tea at 4.30, there were more organized activities. After tea, there was more study preparation. Cranwell was both an educational and a military institution, with military protocols dominant. There were daily kit inspections Cadets had lay out their kit on their bed in a very precise manner. If the instructor wasn’t happy, he might tip the whole lot onto the floor and tell the cadet to start over. Precision was important in aviation. But as military boot camps go, RAF Cranwell was pretty mellow.

Flying instruction started with a demonstration of a plane’s working parts. Here students study a rear aerelon, a hinged flight control surface on the trailing edge of each wing, that controls the roll of the airframe, or effects maneuvers.

Flying instruction began with an initial period of dual and solo work in fundamentals of take off and landing, stalls, spins, forced landings and maneuvers. It was followed by a “diversified” phase to include acrobatics, accuracy approaches, “strange field landings”, My father’s favorite among the trainers was the Tiger Moth. Considered “easy to fly, difficult to fly well”, the RAF found the Moth ideal for training fighter pilots. It had a top speed of 104 mph. a low stalling speed, a ceiling of 14,000 ft. and a range of 300 miles. It was an ideal aircraft on which to learn aerobatics. Once my father was cleared for solo flying, he enjoyed looking down at the countryside gliding by below from the open cockpit of a Moth, while navigating by following railway lines; it’s a view still enjoyed by the pilot of this restored Tiger Moth.

The original Tiger Moth cockpit seems cramped. Being over 6 foot tall my father probably found all cockpits cramped.

The upright shaft at the bottom of the frame is the joystick. As described in this subsequent training manual for monoplanes, the joystick controls the attitude of a machine: to raise or lower its nose, to produce bank to left or right and to turn the nose of the machine to left or right in relation to the horizon. The pilot maneuvers the joystick with his hands and the rudder with his feet. (No shit, Sherlock). I love old training manuals.

Before a pilot could take off, the wooden propeller had to be swung by hand. This potentially hazardous task was carried out by ground crew, or by the pilot himself. Once swung, the tip of the propeller blade suddenly went from zero to 320 feet per second; plenty to take off a hand, smash bones, or split a skull clean in half. Hand propping accidents were not uncommon. They still occur today.

Pioneer aviator Elsie Mackay demonstrates the stance she adopted to stay clear of the propeller arc. Practitioners were instructed to grip the trailing edge, using as little of the fingers as possible, then swing the blade like a golf club, at the same time twisting your body away from the propeller as you ‘follow through’. That reduces the risk of ‘banana fingers’…

Sadly Elsie Mackay’s prominent aviation career was cut short in 1928 when she and her copilot attempted to fly a single engined aircraft across the Atlantic in bad weather. Like Amelia Earhart, her body was never found. The dark side of aviation – death, dismemberment and an unknown grave – were risks that flying school cadets accepted.

I don’t know if my father was amongst these hardy Cranwell College cadets on parade in the snow. but he was among the graduating cadets at a ceremony presided over by “the father of the Royal Air Force”, Sir Henry Montague Trenchard, 1st Viscount Trenchard, who had been given an hereditary peerage for his service to military aviation. He had founded Cranwell College in 1920.

A brief digression on the family name: Trenchard was derived from the Old French word trenchier, meaning to cut, hack, slice. This became a generic term for a swordsman, soldier, man of war, or butcher. Norman knight Roul de Trenchard fought in the Battle of Hastings in 1066. The first recording of the Trenchard name in the UK was on a deed of land granted by William the Conqueror to Paganus Trenchard, witnessed by his grandsons, for services during the conquest of England. The Trenchard descendants, traced through Church records of births and deaths from 1143 onwards, were frequently servants of the state: burghers, sheriffs, judges, knights, politicians. Sir John Trenchard earned his knighthood by fighting on the winning side of the Wars of the Roses. A subsequent Sir John Trenchard became Secretary of State to joint monarchs William and Mary in 1692.
Here’s how I come to share the Trenchard name. On August 4, 1803, Miss Elizabeth Trenchard married Mr. Robert Smith. When their son William was born, he was christened William John Trenchard-Smith. In order to preserve the Trenchard lineage, they fused the family names. William’s son Edward Trenchard-Smith sought his fortune in Australia. He was my great grandfather.
Trenchard emigrants also prospered in America. George Trenchard became Attorney General of West New Jersey. His son Edward Trenchard commanded ships in the US Civil War, ending his career as a Rear Admiral. It seems there is a strong martial element in the Trenchard DNA, and Sir Hugh Montague Trenchard is a prime example.

Viscount Trenchard, as he would become, was certainly an example of the British bulldog breed of Empire Warriors. A bullet to the chest during the Boer War lost him his left lung and caused partial paralysis in his legs. Recuperating in Switzerland, he took up bobsled racing, resulting in a crash that cured the obstruction to his spine, enabling him to return to the Boer War, leading mounted infantry. He survived 6 years of active service in Nigeria before tropical disease forced his return to England. While convalescing, he thought about the future of military power in the air, as yet untried. Concealing the fact that he was partially blind in one eye, he took flying lessons for 10 days and received a pilots license, though he was not particularly gifted and never instructed flying. Administration and political savvy was his real skill, which he demonstrated as commander of the Royal Flying Corps in France during World War One, where he pioneered strategic bombing. After the war he was knighted and became Chief of the Air Staff. In 1920. He founded Cranwell College in 1920.

Here is Viscount Lord Trenchard, on the eve of his retirement as Marshall of the Royal Air Force, inspecting the graduating pilot officers. Trenchard’s nickname in both the Service and Whitehall was “Boom” for “his stentorian utterances and low rumbling tones”. I’m not sure in what tones Lord Trenchard spoke to Pilot Officer E.T. Smith at their brief meeting, when he said ” So, you are from the Australian branch of the family ?”

When my father entered Cranwell College, the name Trenchard was legendary in the RAF. For him to continue to use his full family surname Trenchard Smith that had been hyphenated in Australia since 1860 would have invited regular questions as to how he was related to the Father of the RAF. Something my father wanted to avoid. He did not want to seem to be trading on a famous name. So he uncoupled the joint surname, making Trenchard his middle name and Smith his surname. (He would recouple the surname 25 years later when he retired from the RAF.) But Viscount Trenchard had done his homework on each graduating pilot and noted noted the middle name of Cadet Eric Smith. (Third from the left.) My father probably came to his attention because his rating as a pilot at flying school was “exceptional”.

Nine months after leaving flying school my father was back as an instructor. He would in due course become an instructor of instructors in the training of pilots. He would earn a nickname “Expert Eric”. During his 25 year career, my father flew every new plane that came his way, from a Sopwith Camel to a Vampire jet. His RAF log book recorded flights in over 80 different types of aircraft. As part of an exercise, my father learned to land a plane on an aircraft carrier. The weather was not great, the seas choppy. On his approach he could see the carrier’s deck yawing. But a happy landing ensued.

 

 

Photographs of many of the types of planes he flew in the early to mid 1930’s can be seen in this fascinating website.
https://glostransporthistory.visit-gloucestershire.co.uk/royalair30.htm

****

By 1933, a German fringe politician named Adolf Hitler, previously viewed as a rhetorically skillful clown with a violent following, had gained traction with the electorate aggrieved by the harsh terms of the peace treaty imposed on Germany at the end of World War One. Guided by Josef Goebbels, his chief propagandist, Hitler recorded a widely distributed phonograph album – think today’s podcast, sold in shops on vinyl – in which his strutting antisemitic rants at rallies were replaced by an almost Chancellor like demeanor. Households across Germany listened to a message of national pride and resurgence. Corporations and conservatives believed Hitler would protect their money. Socialists believed Hitler championed the working man.

The text states: “In the deepest need Hindenburg chose Adolf Hitler for Reich Chancellor. You too should vote for List 1.”

To end political instability, rival German power brokers appointed Hitler Germany’s Chancellor, believing they could control him. One of Hitler’s principal political backers wrote:“We box him in. Within two months we will have pressed Hitler into a corner so tight that he’ll squeak.”

Yet, Hitler would would outwit them all and start a world war that wrecked Europe and killed tens of millions.

Hitler’s rise and fall is a factor in my father’s story and the evolution of the Royal Air Force. It’s important to understand what the greatest generation was fighting against. After the Nazis achieved power, Goebbels wrote “ The big joke on Democracy is that it gives its mortal enemies the tools to its own destruction.” Authoritarianism remains the mortal enemy of Democracy. The war is eternal. Today it is being fought in Ukraine.

The danger Hitler posed was evident to former cabinet minister Winston Churchill. He was out of office at this time, considered a passed over war hawk. His 1934 speech, reproduced here with illustrations on Utube, eloquently outlines the issues.

Hitler’s intention to persecute Jews was now out in the open. On a street in Worms, Germany, the antisemitic propaganda newspaper Der Stürmer (The Attacker) posts its headline: “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.”

 

 

“Interracial relationships” between Jews and non-Jews were prohibited under the Nuremberg Race Laws. Citizens were encouraged to report suspicions of the “crime” of interracial relationships to the police.

Other morally repugnant social experiments were being instituted. The Nazis coined the term “Mercy Killing” to describe the involuntary euthanizing of the sick, elderly and disabled. This propaganda poster from the 1930’s gives the high cost of caring for such people as a fundamental justification for euthanasia.

” 60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from an hereditary defect costs the People’s community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too.”

These propaganda posters further point to transactionalism at the heart of Nazi ideology. Here, amplified by a racist trope. The caption from a Nazi propaganda film strip shown to Hitler youth says: “Mentally ill Negro (English) 16 years in an institution costing 35,000 Reichsmarks.”

God’s Will has always been a useful emotional manipulation. Here it was applied to euthanasia and forced sterilization. The caption reads: “…because God cannot want the sick and ailing to reproduce.”

Churchill’ saw the gathering storm ahead. His warnings of Nazi plans for European domination were ignored by a government deeply affected by the horrors of the Great War. Conflict with Germany was to be avoided at all costs. The new Chamberlain government did not invite Churchill into the Cabinet. opting for a policy of appeasement.
Churchill did what he could behind the scenes. He had taken flying lessons (not a good pilot apparently) and was a friend of Lord Trenchard, the father of the Royal Air Force, who shared his views. Although retired from the RAF, and currently in charge of the Metropolitan Police, Trenchard frequently used his platform as a member of the House of Lords to loudly voice his opinion on RAF matters. He knew Germany was secretly developing civilian planes convertible to military use. He pushed for was a massive bombing force as Britain’s best deterrent. His advice, like Churchill’s, was ignored. But it did jolt the government into recognition that the RAF, as Britain’s first line of defense, should be modernized and pilot training expanded.

INSTRUCTING PILOTS

A flight of Hawker Furies flies over Cranwell after a snowfall.

 

Having graduated in September 1932, and sent back to flying school, now Acting Flight Officer E.T. Smith began his duties as an instructor. His full rank would be confirmed a year later. The RAF offered to extend his three year short service commission to six years. At that point, if his service continued to be satisfactory, he would be granted a permanent commission. That would be his dream come true. He started learning the capabilities, and limitations of every different plane that came his way. New models of fighters, bombers, transports, seaplanes were being delivered to RAF bases across England and all Commonwealth countries. RAF needed pilots who could fly a variety of planes, and instructors who could work across the board. There was a shortage in both categories. It seems my father’s love of flight had combined with a flair for instruction.

Instructors trained with a variety of specially modified dual control aircraft. This two seater Avro Type 621 Tutor was a simple but rugged basic trainer, frequently a student pilot’s first experience of the skies. My father spoke fondly of the Tiger Moth for its maneuverability. By 1935 the RAF trained about 300 pilots a year, with plans to increase the strength of the Royal Air Force by 1,500 aircraft by 1937. Cranwell College developed this teaching aid for twelve pupils at a time.

Once pilots had achieved a level of confidence in the air, training progressed to instrument flying. To simulate conditions of zero visibility, this RAF Miles Magister had been adapted for blind flying training. The pilot in the back seat pulled the hood over his cockpit and focussed on his instrument panel.

An instructor sat in the front cockpit, to check the accuracy of the flying and watch out for other aircraft.

 

Once they had their wings, all pilots learned the packing and use of the parachute, should it be necessary to bail out. Practice jumps from a tower approximated the speed of descent, and taught pilots how to land. Flight Officer Smith took the parachute course, training that would prove useful some years later.

Active service was ahead.

POSTED TO INDIA IN 1934

To imagine what the life of an RAF Plight Officer was like on the North West Frontier of India, an understanding of the historical context is helpful. Forgive me for getting into the geo-political weeds here, but if History is not studied, we will repeat its mistakes. And the Sykes-Picot Agreement was a great mistake.

In May 1916, Britain and France, anticipating victory, entered into a secret agreement, with the assent of Imperial Russia, to carve up the soon to be defeated Ottoman Empire into spheres of influence, both political and economic. France got Syria, Britain got Iraq, which was adjacent to British controlled Kuwait. thus providing an Anglo-French dominated corridor linking the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf. When the Soviets took over Russia in late 1917, they revealed the secret agreement to the world. Arabs felt betrayed because they had entered the British side of the war believing they were promised self determination.. They saw the Sykes-Picot Agreement as a covert transfer of Turkish colonial rule to the European powers. Under the British and French mandates, borders were put in place without regard to the ethnic, linguistic, cultural and religious fault lines of the region, Iraq was originally three separate provinces, Kurdish, Sunni and Shiite, of the Ottoman Empire. The clean lines of the European drawn maps caused conflicts the world is still dealing with today.

Inevitably this breach of trust produced Arab insurgencies. By 1920 a countrywide uprising had spread across Iraq. Britain, like all colonial powers throughout the previous century, was brutal in response. using the technology honed by World War 1, armored vehicles and air power. In a secret 1923 memo, then Secretary for War Winston Churchill advocated for the use of mustard gas. “I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes,” he declared, criticizing his colleagues for their “squeamishness”, declaring that “the objections of the India Office to the use of gas against natives are unreasonable. Gas is a more merciful weapon than high explosive shell, and compels an enemy to accept a decision with less loss of life than any other agency of war.” He was overruled. Gas was not deployed, in favor of “aerial policing”, a strategy developed by the new Chief of the RAF, the afore mentioned Sir Hugh Trenchard.
Britain’s Air Minister, Lord Thomson, detailed how one district of “recalcitrant chiefs” was subdued in the Liwa region on the Euphrates in November 1923.
He wrote: “As they refused to come in, bombing was then authorized and took place over a period of two days. The surrender of many of the headmen of the offending tribes followed.”
The RAF flew missions totaling 4,008 hours, dropped 97 tons of bombs and fired 183,861 rounds for the loss of nine men killed, seven wounded and 11 aircraft destroyed behind rebel lines. Between six and ten thousand Iraqis were killed. British and Indian Army losses were less than a thousand. There was little debate on the morality of indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas. Even though the deliberate targeting of ‘non-combatants’ was already regarded as a war crime under the 1899 Hague Conventions, to which Britain was a signatory, the British government insisted the bombing was legitimate suppression of unlawful rebellion in a region under British control.
OK. I’m going deeper into the weeds of Imperialism here.

“The East Offering Its Riches to Britannia”, painted by Roma Spiridone in 1778, speaks volumes about how the British people were sold colonialism by the East India Company. Britain must civilize the savages, convert them to Christianity, and use their resources for the greater good of the Empire. Basically, it’s God’s Will. Who dares argue with that? Starting in the seventeenth century, Britain’s East India Company, using the largest private army in the world, seized control of substantial sections of the Indian subcontinent, colonized Hong Kong and parts of South East Asia, while remitting revenue to the British government as a licensed privateer, before Britain officially assumed full control of India in 1857. The East India Company was the original corporate raider.

Colonialism was the bastard child of racism and capitalism. The European powers may have introduced improvements to medicine, education and infrastructure, but they nonetheless saw their colonial subjects as children of a lesser God, and colonies across Africa, India and Asia as an endless supply of raw materials and cheap labor to feed the economic needs of the burgeoning European middle class. Britain was not the worst but all colonial powers used land seizure, forced labor, unfair taxation and brutal repression of dissent to carry out a policy that was at its core justified by racism. Clearly, I am not a big fan of colonialism, though I recognize that as a baby boomer I am a beneficiary of its legacy.

The British government regarded the strategy of “aerial policing” in Iraq as a pragmatic success. A handful of RAF squadrons, with a small force of troops and armored vehicles maintained Britain’s military control over Iraq until World War Two, even after Iraqi independence in 1932. The policy was adopted across troubled regions of the British Empire. In late 1934 Flight Officer E.T. Smith was posted to one such trouble spot, a rough border province in what is now Pakistan, with orders to take part in support missions against insurgents from bases like this along the Afghan India border.


History’s harsh verdict on colonialism should not extend blame to the foot soldiers, or aviators, in my father’s case, who carried out colonial policies. They believed the world view their governments sold them.. Such was the strength of colonialist indoctrination of the times, when my father joined the Royal Air Force in 1930. Like most Australians, he revered Great Britain, and believed he was serving a righteous cause. As his training began, he must have considered he too might be called upon to drop high explosives on Britain’s enemies in the continuing “police actions” in British controlled regions of the Middle East and South Asia. My father’s view was that war policy, right or wrong, was the responsibility of government; the responsibility of a serving officer was to obey orders. But social values evolve. My father’s experiences in India and subsequently in Libya, convinced him of the ultimate futility of Empire.
In 1936, Mirza Ali Khan, known as the Faqir of Ipi, a long time opponent of the British Raj, intensified his campaign in Northern Waziristan.

Funding for his insurgency was later revealed to have come through from Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany, with the Italian ambassador as conduit. At one time Mirza Ali Khan was able to put 20,000 fighters into the field.

British and Indian Army units pursued the Faqir of Ipi , but he would always vanish. In fact, he would never be captured. .

The Faqir led an ambush against two British marching columns in Waziristan’s previously peaceful Khaisora Valley, trapping the units and inflicting more than a hundred casualties.

RAF strafing runs and air drops of ammunition saved the day. My father was always reticent to talk about his combat experiences, so I don’t know if he was involved in the air cover for the evacuation, but it is probable.

Here’s an extract from the report on what seems like quite a large operation.

After criticism of British bombing in Iraq, the RAF had moderated its terms of engagement in Afghanistan, by the time my father served there between 1935 and 1936, but the policy was still cold blooded. Bi-lingual leaflets were first to be dropped on a rebel village requiring compliance by a certain date otherwise the village would be bombed. If that date passed without compliance, a squadron would return to drop leaflets announcing the village would be bombed at noon the next day, so that the inhabitants could leave and take their herds to the safety of nearby caves. But the village and its fields would continue to be bombed every day until compliance was achieved. Leaflets would again be dropped to indicate it was safe to return. Ultimately insurgencies would dissipate. Till the next incident.

Unlike many retired RAF Officers after WW2, my father would only talk of his combat experiences when pressed. This is the only thing he told me of his involvement in “aerial policing”. Leaflets had been dropped warning of the coming punitive air raid on a small recalcitrant village somewhere in Waziristan. On the appointed day, my father flew a maneuverable fighter bomber, probably the Westland Wapati, named after a graceful American elk. Dive bombing was the Wapati’s speciality. Or it might have been a Hawker Hart, depicted here.

The technique was to pass directly over the target, throttle back and pull the nose up sharply until the airspeed was within 20 mph of the stall. At this point full rudder was applied. This was called a stalled turn. With the nose pointing vertically upwards at low speed, the rudder wheels rotated the aircraft elegantly on its axis to a position heading vertically downwards. If the pilot judged correctly, he should be looking straight down at the target. What my father saw was a lone goat directly below in the impact zone of the bomb. It probably lost its way during the evacuation and had wandered back to the village. My father did not want to kill a goat. He had no problem bombing those that shot at him, but not a goat. Seconds away, he veered sharply to the side and dropped the bomb at the edge of the village, scaring the goat away. A small thing, perhaps offering an ironic comment on the contradictions of war, but reflecting a value system that aspired to protect innocents from harm. But aerial missions, particularly low flying, had its hazards.

Afghan rebels inevitably captured .303 rifles and cartridges. So unless an aircraft was on a dive bombing or strafing run, the rule was to stay above 3,000 feet, out of the range of rifle fire. “The tribesman is a good natural shot, and is fully alive to the necessity for deflection when shooting at fast moving aircraft,” warns the pocket-size 1939 manual Frontier Warfare—India (Army and Royal Air Force). However, if detailed reconnaissance required pilots to fly lower, they should “make full use of their speed, fly an irregular course, and use their weapons to keep down hostile fire….”

If bad weather or ground fire forced a pilot down over hostile territory, his standing orders were: “first remove the bolt from the Lewis gun and throw overboard.” Once landed, the pilot had to burn the plane “by firing a bullet / flare into the petrol tank.” If escape was blocked, “It will be wisest to surrender with good grace and a bold demeanor, preferably to the older and more important-looking men among the crowd; the younger element is liable to be hot-headed and unpleasant.”

The British offered a reward of 9,000 rupees for return of a downed airman. This was generally successful. There had been instances for decades of rebellious tribesmen castrating captured British servicemen and bureaucrats in order to prevent them breeding more invaders. So the RAF provided what were commonly known as “goolie chits”; safe conduct letters for air crew, “goolie” being a Pashto word for testicles. The chits guaranteed a significant reward if the bearer was returned with all his parts intact. This morbid prospect was immortalized in an RAF Mess Hall drinking song by the refrain: “No balls at all. No balls at all. When your engine cuts out, you’ll have no balls at all.”
Provided an officer returned from air operations with all his parts intact, or did not die from the many tropical diseases to which Europeans were susceptible, RAF service on the North West Frontier offered both officers and air crew a pleasant life style at bases like Fort Miram Shah.

An RAF Audax on the North West Frontier

A Bristol Bulldog

Hawker Harts on a plateau. Breakfast under the wing..

 

MONOPLANES

During this period, aviation engineers were developing the successor to the biplane.

 

 

 

 

 

Air displays were staged to popularize aviation as a daring, noble calling.

 

Universities offered flying courses.

To handle their increased pilot intake, the RAF needed well trained instructors. My father resumed these duties when he was posted back to England in November 1936, He was promoted from Flight Officer to Flight Lieutenant, and would spend the next three years at a number of RAF bases, training pilots in the flying techniques of different aircraft, navigation, precision bombing, and aerial combat. The RAF had been developing its first two monoplane fighters, the Hawker Hurricane and the Supermarine Spitfire. In 1936 the Hurricane went into production followed by the Spitfire a year later. My father would learn to fly both planes, then instruct others in their handling. He would ultimately instruct instructors in flight training procedures. Here is his official training record.

Trained pilots received a certificate.

The imminent prospect of a second air war, Speed! became a priority in design. In late 1934, the Air Ministry ordered Hawker to create an “Interceptor Monoplane ” able to carry a total of eight guns. Here’s the appropriately named “Hurricane ” prototype, photographed before its first flight in November 1935.

Hawker improved aerodynamics by making landing gear retractable, The new Rolls Royce Merlin engine, was capable of delivering a maximum level speed of 315 mph (507 km/h). The RAF test pilot’s report on the Hurricane’s maiden flight stated: “The aircraft is simple and easy to fly and has no apparent vices”.

The Supermarine Spitfire prototype photographed below displayed promise but needed improvement. The Spitfire’s stressed-skin construction required precision engineering skills and techniques which were rare in the aviation industry. Initially the Air Ministry passed, but the designers persisted.

Significant improvements resulted. Retractable landing gear, and an enclosed cockpit were installed plus a new elliptical wing, designed to be as thin as possible, thereby reducing drag. The Rolls Royce Merlin engine was enhanced by a new a three-bladed metal propeller and a new cockpit hood, providing a maximum speed to 348 mph (557 km/h), making the Spitfire faster than the Hawker Hurricane. On 3 June 1936, the Air Ministry placed an order for 310 Spitfires, an impressive number for its time.

Here are fully restored replicas of each aircraft passing along the white cliffs of Dover as part of a WW2 air display.

The Spitfire and Hurricane’s future adversary would be the Messerschmidt ME 109,top speed of 350 miles (570 km) per hour. Here’s a full working replica photographed at a recent air show.

 

 

 

Several online tutorials compare both the Spitfire and Hurricane against their most frequent opponent the Messerschmidt.109. Check them out when we reach the Battle of Britain. http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html.

As war loomed, firepower became an important issue in fighter aircraft design. This twin engined Westland Whirlwind carried four closely grouped 20 mm cannon mounted in the nose. Clustering the weapons eliminated the convergence problems of wing-mounted guns. Its concentrated firepower (600 rounds a minute) was intended to strafe columns of vehicles, supply trains, and shipping.

Screenshot

 

Faster than the Spitfire, the Whirlwind had good maneuverability, climb performance, and an enhanced “fighting view”. The pilot sat high under one of the world’s first full bubble canopies with a commanding view of the target. The prototype produced in 1938 was the most heavily armed fighter of its era. Due to problems with its engine, only 114 were produced. The Westland Whirlwind was among the 80 different aircraft listed in my father’s logbook. One of the more unusual was the Supermarine Walrus. a single-engine amphibious biplane intended for reconnaissance.

With its all-metal fuselage, pilots found it noisy, cold, and uncomfortable. This particular Walrus was sent to Australia, were it served in WW2 before disappearing during a night reconnaissance. The Walrus could be modifies for catapult launching from cruisers or battleships, For those who like to get into the weeds of aviation history, this 1940 instructional film reveals the complex technological process and precise teamwork involved in catapulting a seaplane off a ship. 26 minutes in, there are good shots of the Walrus catapult take off, water landing, and crane recovery. Plus one hair raising moment @…

As part of an exercise, my father learned to land a plane on an aircraft carrier. The weather was not great, the seas choppy. On his approach he could see the carrier’s deck yawing below. He had to gauge the right moment to cut power.

But a happy landing followed.

From 1936 till mid 1940, Flight Lieutenant E. T. Smith served as a training instructor at various RAF bases. As he learned and taught the flight characteristics of a variety of fighters and bombers, he earned the nickname “expert Eric”. He is featured next to his commanding officer in a cartoon published as “Aces of Tern Hill”.

The new King George the Sixth, who had got his wings in 1918 serving in France, rose to Group Captain by 1922, and had become Air Vice Marshall of the Royal Air Force upon the sudden abdication of his brother Edward the Eighth. In 1938 he visited the Central Flying School at Upavon, and met with all the instructors including my father, seen here in the top row. “H.M. The King” is seated in the center of the front row. George the Sixth was played by Colin Firth in the movie The King’s Speech. Other aspects of his life are featured in the Netflix series The Crown.

The nomadic and uncertain life of an RAF officer was not ideal for long term relationships. My father had girlfriends wherever he was stationed, but none became serious until October 1938. Here s my father’s letter to his mother who had travelled from Auckland , New Zealand to visit him that year, and had recently sailed back.

My mother, as much as my father, was a significant influence on my life, So I will digress for a moment and tell her story up to the point she met my father.

Vera Eileen Baxter was born on April 4th 1918. World War One was grinding slowly to its conclusion. Young Vera lived in an upstairs flat in Putney, London, with her mother Eileen and father John Baxter, an Northern Irish merchant captain who was often away at sea. Vera was an only child. A subsequent male baby was lost in miscarriage. When at home on leave, her father was frequently out of the house. “Why doesn’t Daddy take me out like other girl’s daddies do?” She recalled once asking her mother. Extracts from her hand written memoir will provide another perspective on RAF life. Also, the account of her childhood chronicles the trauma of an Irish/English custody battle of the period.
When my mother was eight years old, John George Briggs Baxter, to give him his full name, returned home from sea a week earlier than expected, to find his wife Mrs. Madge Amelia Baxter, nee Clarkson, absent, and his daughter cared for by friends, who advised him she was just taking a short holiday with a lady friend and would be back soon. In fact my grandmother had become increasingly lonely during her husband’s long absences, and had formed a relationship with another unhappily married man. They were spending a few days together across the Channel in France.
In my mother’s memoir she writes how her father came into her room late at night, sat on the end of her bed, silhouetted by a shaft of light from the landing, and burst into tears. Amid heaving sobs, he told Vera that she would never see her mother again. She had committed the marital crime of adultery, and he was instituting divorce proceedings. John Baxter was a proud Irish Protestant, a member of the Loyal Orange Association, an anti Catholic political group. Back then, divorce between Protestants was permitted under these circumstances, but it would be a blot on the family name. The anger and bitterness my grandfather felt at his betrayal would be most keenly experienced by his child. The scar from this traumatic night would never fully fade.
He took young Vera immediately to his father’s house in Northern Ireland to be looked after by his sisters, who resented the imposition as did all senior members of the extended family. Great aunts Gertrude and Harriet were the worst, referring to Vera’s mother as “that Scarlett Woman…” They would not call her Vera, the name her mother chose; instead she was called by her middle name, Eileen, because it was more Irish. These aunts would make public show of their religious devotion, praying fervently, when they accompanied their brother and his niece to Church on Sundays. John Baxter was somewhat deaf and tended to fall asleep during sermons. His sisters took this opportunity to exchange gossip about the other congregants, particularly the women, Their hypocritical behavior was digested by my mother, feigning attention to the sermon. contributing to her life long suspicion of organized religion.
Vera’s aunts put her into a series of Dickensian boarding schools, the first of which expelled her when they learned she was “a child of divorce.” A new school was found for her; Clair Lodge in Newcastle, County Down. a building she describes as “gaunt.” It sat at the foot of the Mountains of Mourne, in its own grounds, surrounded by a thick hedge, right beside a beach, sometimes lashed by gale force winds. On one occasion the girl’s dormitory windows facing the beach were blown in. It took days before repairs were accomplished.

“The winter months were unspeakably cold.We washed in cold water from the jugs on washstands, and often had to break the ice before doing so.” Food was “reasonable, but I never want to see massed swede again as long as I live.”
Medical care was survival of the fittest.
“If you became ill at Clare Lodge, the treatment was to be confined to a large empty bedroom on the far side of the building. No doctor ever visited. Miss Parkes brought the meals on a tray. I had the usual share of childhood diseases; chicken pox – ‘Don’t scratch, Eileen!’ Mumps and the agony of forcing food down with aching jaws to avoid having the same meal brought back again. One unfinished bread and butter pudding was served three days running till it turned sour. “
My worst illness was whooping cough. This time I was not put to bed, and walked around with it for three weeks. Once, during lunch, I was red/purple in the face from whooping, and Miss Agnes said” Stop coughing, Eileen dear, you’re making yourself worse!” Mercifully it was the last day of term, and when my grandfather picked me up, I was violently sick, and he took me straight to the doctors. I remembers him standing over my bed, as I whooped and whooped, saying ” She’s going to die..”

For four and a half years Vera was often cold, hungry, and made to feel inferior. Throughout this period her mother petitioned for visitation rights: initially she was allowed only one hour per visit.
” I longed to see her, but I was constantly being filled with propaganda against her. Prior to her visit, my grandfather stormed around the house, spitting out hatred of her. and offered me a penny if I did not see her. My mind was in a complete muddle. By the time she arrived, I ran and hid under a bed. She eventually found me,, knelt down begging me to come out. We had a tearful re-union. then she had to go back to England. ,
In the morality of the times, Vera’s mother was “the guilty party” and had lost custody. . Finally, having married the man who had been the cause of the divorce, she could now offer a stable home, she petitioned for custody. The court decided the best interests of the child, now turning thirteen, were to live with her mother in England where she had grown up, rather than in Ireland, where her father would be away at sea for long periods.
Vera moved to England to live with her mother and her new stepfather, Mr. Fred Medwin, a businessman, whose fortunes waxed and waned over the years.
” I came back to England with an Irish brogue that was so thick that my stepfather could not understand a lot of what I said. Now I had to be groomed to be a well mannered English lady. I was grateful to be back with my mother but terrified of my stepfather. He was subject to outbursts of rage, and would yell loudly, with his eyes bulging in anger, usually picking on some small thing quite suddenly. Each time this happened my stomach would do several somersaults, and my heart raced. The old cliche ‘out of the frying pan into the fire’ applied to those early days.”
Stepfather Fred Medwin, with a grown son of his own, was a good parent, despite fits of temper. John Baxter, her actual father, disowned Vera when she succumbed to pressure to assume her stepfather’s surname. She never heard from her father again. Another blow upon the wound. Vera, no longer Eileen. was once again addressed as Vera. She was sent to a girls boarding school, Abbotsford in Broadstairs, where she excelled at French and piano lessons, but following the pattern of her Irish years, was rebellious and a misfit. Things changed at age 16, when she was sent to “finishing school”: An Ursuline convent school in Brussels, which specialized in teaching the girls to be good cooks, as preparation for marriage. The warmth of the Catholic Nuns contrasted with the disdain she had experienced from Protestant clergy. Her confidence grew. She became fluent in French, and learned dressmaking. For the first time in memory she began to feel happy. Then she was cast as the lead in two stage shows at the school, performing in French,. She had found her calling. She decided to become an actress, perhaps to receive from an audience the approval she had been denied throughout her formative years.

Due to a financial downturn, the family could not afford to send her to RADA. She interviewed with agents, some of whom made it clear what the price of representation would be. She declined. The best entry level strategy was to join an extras agency, get booked for crowd scenes at a guinea a day, be noticed and someday be given a one line part. She signed up for crowd work immediately. There were four movie studios—Pinewood, Beaconsfield, Denham, and Elstree—not far from Cookham where the Medwin family lived. Stepfather Fred’s business had bounced back and he was operating two local hotels and renting out another property. He bought Vera, in her words, a ‘terrible old bone shaker’ for ten pounds sterling. She was regularly at work across the range of studios. Extras had to provide their own clothes except when the movie was a period piece. Occasionally she was the lighting stand-in for a prominent actress Diana Churchill. Same height, same hair coloring. She started to score those 1-line parts.. Waitress: “Your boiled egg, sir.” Three days’ work playing a newspaper reporter followed. She was slowly making her way up the ladder. Acting is a thankless profession, in which few however talented make a decent living. But my mother had beauty, drive and an extrovert personality that masked her insecurities. She might have done well. Then she met a young RAF officer, my father. It was apparently love at first sight.

Resuming my father’s story, his letter to his mother continues, with financial concerns, and an indication that relations with his father had improved since his departure to the UK eight years before. Trenchard-Smith Senior could only have been impressed with his son’s application to his chosen career, and had apparently sent some money previously so that his son could buy a car upon his return from service in India. A Flight Lieutenant’s salary was tight for a married couple, and my father would have to bear all expenses, including purchasing a life insurance policy, until the RAF marriage allowance adjusted his yearly pay.

The next section of the letter offers a clue to his father’s prejudice towards those who were not White Anglo Saxon Protestants. Although there was not an outright prohibition on marriage to Roman Catholics, such a match would not have been popular. Vera’s mother and stepfather were Protestant, but open minded enough to send Vera to a Catholic “finishing school” for girls in Belgium, where she learned excellent culinary skills from Cordon Blue chefs. These were evident during their early courtship when my father “popped down” to see her each weekend.

Food at an RAF Officer’s Mess was, shall we say, undistinguished. My mother’s cooking was phenomenal, and she taught me to prepare a passable range of dishes. among the many educational gifts she passed on. The letter then refers, with my father’s sense of irony, to a conversation during his mother’s visit, about him being ” a confirmed bachelor”, before concluding he was awfully happy.

My mother, late in life, began a handwritten memoir which she never finished. I will quote from it occasionally where it sheds light on social conditions and RAF life that she and my father experienced together.
They met when she was invited by a hopeful RAF officer suitor to accompany him to a Saturday nightclub ball at the officers mess at RAF, Upavon. where Flight Lt. Eric Smith was also stationed. When the ball was in full swing, she noticed “aa tall dark, handsome man who was staring at me intently. A few seconds later I waas told that there was someone who wanted to meet me.” When they were introduced, it was a classic case of love at first sight. or as my mother put it. “We both fell like a ton of bricks.“,
Their first date took place a few days later, lunch and a movie at the local cinema screening a revival of Rudoph Valentino’s silent classic The Son of the Sheik. Like many cinemas of the day, the program featured an organ recital in the interval. With blasts on the pipes, the instrument and its player rose from beneath the stage, with a banner sign round its base – ” up came slowly – Eric Smith and his organ. This amused us a lot.” When Eric delivered me home, he parked and blurted out “I’m madly in love with you..Will you marry me?” I said yes, and crept into the house on cloud nine.”
It was a big decision to propose marriage 20 days after first meeting. One factor that may have impacted my father on his visits to Vera Medwin at her stepfather’s house was witnessing her distress when her stepfather drunkenly argued with her mother. According to my mother, my father told her as he left not to worry. ” I will take you away from all this.” Luckily Fred took to Eric straight away, as did her mother.

 

Vera’s stepfather Fred Medwin,, seen here standing beside her mother, gave the bride away, in the absence of her real father who had ceased contact with his daughter when she changed her name to Medwin. As my mother put it: “He threw me away.”
Flight Lt. E. T. Smith had several weeks leave due to him so he took his new bride for a honeymoon in France. Fred helped out with the cost of motoring from Paris to the Riviera. My mother’s account in her memoir, when read today, has a fin de ciecle quality. It was June 1939. They toured the Eiffel Tower, Napoleon’s tomb. Palais de Versailles.Taxis drove at frightening speed, though this probably didn’t bother my father. They saw night club performances forbidden in England; nude and semi nude girls at Bal Tavern and the Folies Bergère. Linguistic differences amused my mother who was semi-fluent in French. When the honeymooners requested a double bed, it was called un lit Anglais. Similarly a contraceptive was un capot Anglais, which British people of the day called a French letter. Both nations blaming the other for sex. First night in Paris, the honeymooners got oyster poisoning from a restaurant famous for its oysters. When they finally emerged from their room 2 days later looking tired and disheveled, the hotel staff, my mother said, gave them admiring looks.
They drove to Monte Carlo, economized by camping out on alternate nights. At Hotel Chateau Diedato my mother had her first sight of the Mediterranean, where she enjoyed time on a pebbly beach. She reported how my father in comparison extolled the smooth sandy beaches of Auckland and Sydney. My mother would spend her last 30 years living a short walk from the sandy beach of Avalon, New South Wales. Perhaps her honeymoon influenced her choice. They certainly by her account had a good time. They bought “dirty french postcards” and sent them to Eric’s brothers and his fellow officers.
At the hotel where they spent a week, the honeymooners were befriended a small wirey German man in his fifties. “He said we looked so happy he was sure we were not married.” recalled my mother. His name was Peter Bloch. He would reconnect with my parents in England. He had been a solicitor to the former German Kaiser Wilhelm , who was deposed in 1918. His service to the Kaiser was engraved on his gold cigarette lighter. Mr Bloch’s wife had denounced him to the Nazis, causing him to flee, and perhaps influencing Mr. Bloch’s views on marriage. He had originally been born in England and was now applying for a British passport. Given the recent Nazi annexations, he was sure war was imminent. Other British holiday makers dismissed it, believing Mr. Hitler will keep his word this time. A few felt if there was war, it would be short, that there could never be another conflagration like The Great War. British complacency, even ambivalence, about the Nazi threat has been well depicted in a range of Brit TV series . As for their honeymoon my parents put such thoughts aside and enjoy a beachside oasis of peace while they could. This involved visits to casinos , illegal in England, nightclubs and cabaret till the wee hours, in the company of two British doctors on leave from Somalia, and the spritely Peter Bloch, who despite is age could out-drink everybody, yet was still the first on the beach the next morning. He knew an era was about to end.
Upon their return to England, my parents were soon moved into married housing on the base at at RAF Upavon. My mother derived some amusement, which I share, from the bureaucratic manner in which all household inventory was documented on the official form, with items listed as if standing stiffly to attention. ” For instance: Mats/ Door, Mats/Bath Cork, and importantly, Pots/ Kitchen to differentiate from Pots/ Chamber. Now, if you reached the rank of Group Captain, your Pots/ Chamber had a gold ring around the rim and a crown…”
Not a time, my mother thought, when a man needed to be reminded of his rank. She always had an irreverent attitude to officialdom, Her memoir provides a window into the life of an RAF wife.

Extract

In August of 1939, Britain and Poland signed an agreement of mutual assistance. This mean that were any foreign power to interfere with either country militarily, the other would rush to their aid. Days later, on September 1st, Germany crossed the Polish border under a flag of nationalism, on an invented crusade to liberate the oppressed Germans of Danzig, a semi-independent area created by the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, 1919.

 

All the officers at Central Flying School, Upavon, including my father, wanted to go on operations, They were told they were too valuable as instructors training future pilots, for which massive recruitment was underway. The courses lasted six to eight weeks. Many retired officers rejoined the RAF and came to the CFS for a “refresher course”. Instructors like my father would assess their flying skills on aircraft they had flown before, and introduce them to the new Hurricane and Spitfire. The commanding officer of the Refresher Squadron listed this pilot’s ability as “Exceptional”, the same rating my father held.

One of the pilots taking a refresher course at the Central Fylying School early in i940 was Douglas Bader, whose RAF career was immortalized in Paul Brickhill’s best seller and  1956 movie Reach For The Sky, which topped the UK box office that year.

Bader had graduated from CFS in 1930, the same year my father entered the school. They were friendly but not close at that time. They had different attitudes to flying. My father was a keen but prudent adventurer, cautiously pushing the boundaries of new aircraft. Bader was an extrovert who saw flying as a means of demonstrating his mastery of the environment. He had established a reputation for aerobatics at the 1931 Hendon Air Show, and was training to win the next year’s title. Two pilots had already been been killed disobeying regulations by practicing maneuvers at under 500 feet. On 14 December 1931, at the Reading Aero Club, Bader attempted some low-flying aerobatics in a Bristol Bulldog biplane, apparently on a dare. He crashed when the tip of the left wing touched the ground. Reach For The Sky accurately recreated the cartwheel nature of the crash.

In his last barrel roll, he swung the tip of the upper wing too low to the ground.The plane cartwheeled and broke in half.

Bader’s legs were mangled in the process. Both had to be amputated—one above and one below the knee. Bader’s report in his logbook read:. “Crashed slow rolling near the ground. Bad show.”
After a long convalescence, during which he needed morphine for pain relief, Bader was fitted with 1932 issue artificial legs. This was a hard adjustment for a man who had captained rugby, cricket and hockey teams as a student. He met and married Thelma Edwards, a waitress in the local tea room. She greatly helped in his recovery,. He fought hard to regain his former abilities. In time, he was able to drive a specially modified car, play golf, and even dance.

As soon as he was physically able, Bader successfully retook all necessary flight training courses. Despite political connections, Bader was nonetheless declared unfit for duty. He was invalided out, and joined a company the would become Shell Oil.

As war approached, Bader repeatedly requested that the Air Ministry accept him back into the RAF, but he was told only “ground jobs” were being offered. Using his connections at the Air Ministry, Bader eventually regained a medical categorization for operational flying at the end of November 1939 and was posted to the Central Flying School , where my father instructed, to be given a refresher course on modern types of aircraft. He had convinced the Air Ministry that a fighter pilot really did not need legs to shoot at the enemy.

On 27 November, 1939 eight years after his accident, and days after his arrival at CFS, Bader flew solo again in an Avro Tutor. My father, who was overseeing his refresher course, was a witness. Bader, once airborne, he could not resist the temptation to turn the biplane upside down at 600 feet inside the circuit area. On the few occasions my father spoke about Bader, he was ambivalent. While he respected Bader’s courage and determination, he found him a somewhat overbearing personality, always seeking to be the center of attention, his daredevil behavior potentially a risk to other pilots. The low level stunt he just pulled to impress the Flying School revealed he had lost none of his penchant for recklessness. But my father recognized that war, particularly war in the air, needs daredevils. Who would not be inspired by a legless man volunteering for aerial combat? Bader certainly had real skills as a pilot. He quickly progressed through the Fairey Battle and Miles Magister, the last training stage before flying Spitfires and Hurricanes. In January 1940, Bader left the CFS to join 19th Squadron on operational duty. When the Battle of Britain began, his skills in aerial combat became evident. He would be credited with downing 24 Luftwaffe planes between 1940 and 1941.
All RAF officers wanted their turn on “ops”. From the start of the period known as “the phony war”. my father’s requests for “ops” were repeatedly denied because of his value as an instructor of instructors, He found this particularly galling in May 1940 during the collapse of the British Expeditionary Force and the evacuation of Dunkirk, the chaos of which is well conveyed in Charles Cundall’s famous painting. Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk movie brilliantly captures the RAF experience supporting the evacuation.

Fearing the potential loss of the army, the British government were reluctant to risk experienced pilots they would need to defend Britain for the invasion likely to follow. My father chafed. My mother was to a degree relieved. Her childhood had embedded a fear of abandonment. heightened by marrying an RAF pilot. She knew flying fatalities were a fact of life in peacetime. The scale of the war to come could barely be imagined. My father’s importance as an instructor at CFS would at least delay the possibility of the telegram all wartime wives dreaded. At the height of the Battle of Britain, the life of a Spitfire pilot was could be as little as four weeks.

Between February and May 1940, Bader practiced formation flying and air tactics, as well as undertaking patrols over convoys out at sea. During this time, he crashed a Spitfire on take-off. He had forgotten to switch the propeller pitch from coarse pitch ( for high speed flying) to fine pitch (for take off), resulting in the aircraft careering down the runway at 80 mph before crashing. Despite a head wound, Bader tried to walk to another Spitfire for a second attempt and found that his artificial legs had been buckled from being forced beneath the rudder pedals during the crash. He recognized that if he had not lost his legs previously, he would have definitely lost them then. Recovery this time was a matter of ordering replacement legs. Despite this repeat snafu, Bader’s skills as a Spitfire pilot became evident when he brought down a Dornier in action over Dunkirk..
Bader had his own ideas about aerial combat. He favored using the sun and altitude to ambush the enemy, but the RAF did not share his opinions. Official orders/doctrine dictated that pilots should fly line-astern and attack singly. Bader began using his Air Ministry contacts to lobby for the “Big Wing” approach, a massive formation of six squadrons in a frontal attack on the approaching bombers. As his “kill count” grew, the Air Ministry took note. He was promoted from pilot officer through Flight Lt. to Squadron Leader within a year.
But when the Blitz on London started, Ft. Lt. E.T. Smith got his wish for action. He was assigned to a squadron on reserve night fighter duty. He did not like to talk about his wartime experiences. He did not want me growing up during Britain’s decades long victory parade, believing War was glorious. A night fighter pilot’s task was challenging. Radar could provide the direction of enemy bombers, but once they were engaged and dispersed, individual enemy aircraft were hard to locate accurately in the dark. Being in the right place at the right time for those few seconds of target visibility was a matter of luck. Pursuit is a lot easier in daylight. On his few missions he was unsure whether any of the bursts he fired would have brought down an enemy plane. The only other detail he offered was that he received, as a night fighter pilot, an extra ration of carrots, because of the perceived benefit to eyesight of a heavy dose of beta carotene. Vitamin A.

The Ministry of Information (MOI) had mounted a big campaign to support food rationing regulations. Food was a weapon of war. Both its propagation and conservation were vital. Embedded in the propaganda campaign for sustainable nutrition was an additional objective; the deliberate attempt to disguise a significant reason for RAF success against the Luftwaffe – Radar, a secret advanced warning system, that enabled RAF fighters to lie in wait for incoming waves of bombers. An explanation for the uptick in pilot victories needed to be circulated. The MOI interviewed RAF night fighter ace, John Cunningham, nicknamed “Cat’s Eyes”, who ultimately shot down 20 planes, 19 at night. He attributed his accuracy in targeting to eating an excess of carrots. They improved his eyesight, he said. The MOI published the interview, the British public responded, and the campaign took off. As food rationing increased, the carrot and the potato became national characters throughout the war.

The carrot became a sugar substitute when rationing limited two people to 8 ounces of sugar a week. The kids are unimpressed.

Even Walt Disney lent a hand. Did this inspire Bugs Bunny?

Some have said the publicized benefits of carrots to Battle of Britain fighter pilots was in fact part of a disinformation campaign to deflect attention from a new technology critical to Air Defense – Radar. It certainly helped enshrine the carotene benefit in Myth. There is some anecdotal evidence that the Luftwaffe might have believed it and issued some fighter pilots with extra carrot rations. Rationing had begun in 1940. Here’s a collage of food propaganda posters.

By September 1940 my father had resumed his role as instructor of instructors at Central Flying School. Douglas Bader would occasionally visit. He was becoming a national celebrity as the legless air ace with an impressive list of credited “kills”. Here is a colorized photo of him boarding a Spitfire without assistance, swinging the longer artificial leg into the cockpit first.

The winter of 1940 – 41 was particularly severe. The water pipes in my parents’ quarters froze. Roads and pathways were icy and treacherous. There were eight steps leading up to the Central Flying School Officers’ Mess. Newly promoted Squadron Leader Bader slipped on an icy patch and fell while attending the Saturday night dance, splitting his dress pants open below the crotch. Colleagues helped him inside. My mother carried needle and thread in her handbag and offered to sew up the tear. Douglas Bader sat in his underwear in a bathroom, while my mother used her convent taught needlepoint skills on his trousers. Once restored for public exhibition, Bader asked my mother to dance. His wife of ten years, Thelma, to whom he was devoted, was the only woman he ever danced with, but she could not attend. Would my mother oblige? My mother’s memoir continues: ” He felt they would manage if I took a larger step with one foot than the other. As we foxtrotted to the center of the room, suddenly Douglas let out a yell of pain, then hobbled with me to the nearest chair. Everyone was looking in apprehension. Then Douglas started laughing uncontrollably. I kept asking with concern what was wrong. ” If you must know, ducky, I got my balls caught in my false leg.”

Hilarity ensued. Bader was an ebullient extrovert, popular in the Mess. My mother recalls him amusing an audience with one of the ironies of being a double amputee serving officer. Boot polish kept getting on his socks. The system required that an officer leave the shoes he needed to be cleaned outside his room overnight for his batman to take care of before breakfast. In Bader’s case each shoe contained his artificial leg, still fitted with a sock. The batman would not remove the shoes from the “tin legs”before polishing, always smearing the socks. Social history trivia is a window on British classism.
During the Battle of Britain, Bader’s competitive nature and genuine aviation skills made him an ace fighter pilot. He was eventually credited with 22 aerial victories. One advantage that Bader had over his fellow fighter pilots came courtesy of his amputations. The high g-force experienced by pilots throughout combat often caused them to pass out, as the blood was forced to drain from their brains and into their legs. Bader’s dual amputation meant that he didn’t lose as much blood to his lower extremities, allowing him to maintain blood pressure and stay conscious for longer.
During 1941 Bader’s wing was re-equipped with Spitfire VBs, which had two Hispano 20 mm cannon and four .303 machine guns. Bader flew a Mk VA equipped with eight .303 machine guns, as he insisted that these guns were more effective against fighter opposition. His tactics required a close-in approach in which he felt the lower calibre weapons had a more devastating concentrated effect.
For a better understanding of the war in the air, there is much analysis available on line on the relative merits of the Spitfire, Hurricane and Messerschmidt.
In fact an actual trial of a Hurricane versus an Me 109 was conducted in May 1940 by the RAF, using a captured undamaged Messerschmidt.

Both aircraft were flown by experienced fighter pilots. The trial focussed on four comparisons: take-off performance, rate of climb to 15,000 feet, dogfighting; and line-astern formation flying.
In the first test, the two aircraft took off together and climbed straight to 15,000 feet. The performance of the Me 109 in this test was significantly better than that of the Hurricane, despite the fact that the Hurricane was fitted with a constant speed airscrew and flown at full throttle and full revs.
At 15,000 feet the aircraft separated and approached one-another head-on and commenced the dogfight. The Hurricane pilot did a stall turn followed by a quick vertical turn, enabling him to lock onto the 109’s tail. The pilot of the 109 was unable to prevent this maneuver succeeding. From that point the Hurricane pilot had no difficulty remaining on the tail of the Me 109. The pilot of the 109 tried all possible maneuvers, concluding with the one most usually employed by German pilots, namely a half-roll and vertical dive. The Hurricane followed this maneuver but the 109 drew away at the commencement of the dive, being the faster machine.
The pilot who flew the Hurricane gave this opinion..
“The Me 109 is faster than the Hurricane by some 30 to 40 miles an hour on the straight and level. It can out-climb and initially out-dive the Hurricane. On the other hand it has not the maneuverability of the Hurricane, which can turn inside the Me 109 without difficulty.”
The conclusions drawn from these tests enabled the RAF to train new pilots in combat strategy and tactics to maximize strengths and minimize weaknesses of the Hurricane. retired Wing Commander “Bunny” Current gave this evaluation after the war.
“I flew [Hurricanes] almost daily for just short of three years, from December 1938 to August 1941, when I took command of a Spitfire squadron in Hampshire. The Hurricane was a magnificent war-horse, with its unsurpassed gun platform in the leading edge of the wings, which had a deadly promise. It had no vices whatsoever, with superb reliability, and was so easy to fly in all weather conditions. Totally trustworthy in all respects, it was a confidence-giving aeroplane, loved by all who flew it.”
While the Spitfire became the dominant fighter by the end of the war, the Hurricane would be responsible for 60% of German aircraft shot down during the Battle of Britain. The loser in aerial combat, if he survived the bullets disabling the plane, had one chance to stay alive as his aircraft plummeted down, his parachute.


.
The folded silk canopy, checked by the pilot before take off, also provided a comfortable seat. U Tube has an interesting piece on WW2 parachutes, British, German and American.

 

544 RAF pilots of Fighter Command and more than 2,500 German aircrew were killed during the Battle of Britain. .At the height of the battle, the average life of a Spitfire pilot was 4 weeks, as more and more pilots went into the meat grinder.. Squadron Leaders E.T. Smith and Squadron Leader D. Bader knew the law of averages was not in their favor. As did Vera Smith and Thelma Bader. But the ethos of the time was to suppress emotion, grit your teeth, get on with it. Angst was suppressed by light hearted banter, dance parties, cigarettes and alcohol. Movies at the local picture palace, accompanied by reassuring propaganda newsreels. On radio the new Prime Minister Winston Churchill lifted morale with stirring rhetoric spiced with wit. Hitler had declaimed over the airwaves. “Germany will wring Britain’s neck like a chicken!” After the Battle of Britain, Churchill quipped back : “Some chicken. Some neck.”
As with all service men and women, their lives would be effected by the strategic decisions of high command. In 1940 Sir Hugh Montague 1st Viscount Trenchard, whose portrait as Metropolitan Police Commissioner is reproduced here, returned from retirement to exert his influence on defense policy. which would have an effect on missions undertaken by 242 Squadron, North Weald, where Bader and my father were stationed.

This was Viscount Trenchard’s official portrait upon retiring as Metropolitan Police Commissioner in 1936. The regalia looks a bit ridiculous today for an officer of the law. You might reflect on why the chosen pose had him gazing upwards to the right. The pomp and paraphernalia of officialdom always amuses me.

 

A brief digression on the iconic and politically skillful Father of the Royal Air Force,. Viscount Trenchard had a powerful personality . “Boom”, it bears repeating, was the Whitehall nickname.for “his stentorian utterances and low rumbling tones”. During his five years as Metropolitan Police Commissioner and subsequently, he was never reticent about voicing his opinion as a newly created Viscount from the pulpit of the House of Lords, if he felt the interests of the RAF he founded were threatened in any way. He opposed the Air Ministry for prioritizing manufacture of Fighters over Bombers. He offered a better plan for the air defense of Singapore , which the government would soon regret rejecting. In 1939, then Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, hoping to remove Trenchard from his public platform in England, offered the gadfly peer the post of organizing advanced training for RAF pilots in Canada. All offered posts were declined. After the failure of the Norwegian campaign, Trenchard used the House of Lords to criticize the Government’s half-hearted prosecution of the war. .
When Winston Churchill replaced Chamberlain, he wanted to find a place for this this leader in the field of aviation warfare. It is said that Viscount Trenchard aspired to be both in charge of the Air Ministry as well as becoming some form of joint secretary of defense, making the RAF a driver in the war effort. rather than a component. That was more power than Churchill was prepared to give away. Trenchard realized that by his rash demands had excluded himself from a pivotal role in the British war effort, so he became an unofficial Inspector-General for the RAF, visiting deployed squadrons across Europe and North Africa on morale-raising visits. In May 1940 Trenchard visited 12th Squadron in France.

But Trenchard always had Churchill’s ear. He successfully lobbied for the removal of the Chief of the Air Staff and the Commander-in-Chief of Fighter Command. Both were replaced by Trenchard protégés.
Trenchard proposed that the RAF should “Lean Towards France” – Go on the offensive, having won the battle of Britain, engage the Luftwaffe over French skies, and win the resulting battle of attrition. That was the theory, of which Douglas Bader was a strong supporter. The RAF introduced a new offensive stance: the Circus sorties, daylight raids undertaken by a small force of bombers with a powerful fighter escort.

They were intended to lure enemy fighters into the air so that they could be outnumbered, engaged and destroyed, while protecting the bombers from attack on a specific target; the initial code name: Ramrod. Rhubarb was code for a small-scale attack by fighters using cloud cover, to surprise and destroy German aircraft in the air or on the ground.

The RAF’s ‘Circus’ raids, had been under way since early 1941. British intelligence had detected the imminent rift in the Nazi/Soviet alliance.and observed much of the Luftwaffe assigned to protect the French coast was being transferred to the east in the build up to the invasion of Russia. When Nazi tanks rolled across the Russian border on June 11 , the RAF stepped up their attacks over occupied Europe to draw Luftwaffe units back to France and take pressure off Stalin’s Russian Front, The Luftwaffe countered by stationed its remaining squadrons at bases further inland, from where they could decline combat or engage RAF fighters in places where they were at a tactical disadvantage for lack of fuel. “Circus” sweeps by 242 Squadron at the beginning of June had been uneventful.

Screenshot

On June 17 , 242 Squadron was ordered to provide close escort to Blenheim Bombers on a raid over France. Squadron Leader E. T. Smith, probably rose at 4 am , had breakfast with his fellow pilots, and attended final briefings from Wing Commander Kellett, who led the mission. At 6.30 am the Squadron took off. Twelve aircraft, a mixture of Hurricanes and Spitfires joined the flight of Blenheim MK. 5. Bombers and crossed the English Channel.

The major remaining German fighter groups in France, JG26 and JG2, generally only intercepting when conditions were in their favor. 15 miles out fro Bethune, they attacked in significant numbers. The RAF formation was scattered in the ensuing melee.

Both Hurricane and Spitfire guns carried 14 seconds of ammunition, fired either in bursts or continuously. Pilots liked to leave a couple of bursts available in case of a dogfight on the way home.. From my father’s brief account of the action, he chased an ME 109, got behind it, and fired a short burst. He saw smoke streaming from its engine as it peeled away. At that moment cannon fire from another ME. 109 raked his plane. As he banked away, smoke started pouring into the cockpit. The Hurricane was not going to make it home. He knew he had to bail out while he still had flight control. As the smoke thickened, he carried out the procedure he had learned for a clean exit, one that safeguarded against the slipstream slamming the pilot into the tail section. Let gravity do the work. He slid the cockpit canopy back, flipped the plane upside down, released the harness holding him into his seat, and dropped out into the sky. This digital simulation created by video gamers for a Utube demo captures such an adrenalin charged moment.

Screenshot

He pulled the ripcord, and the parachute opened about 2000 feet above the ground.As he steered the ‘chute towards a field, he saw it was surrounded by German troops. He landed without injury in the middle of the field. A German officer approached. He was greeted courteously. My father heard the actual words that would be immortalized in many WW2 movies – ” For you the war is over.”

My father never discussed how he felt at the moment of capture. He must have felt gratitude at escaping almost certain death. The possibility of going home to his wife one day, when the odds of surviving years of missions was remote, mingled with deep disappointment that he could no longer use his accumulated expertise in pilot training to aid the war effort, that he did not have a better innings, to use a cricketing metaphor prevalent among the young pilots the RAF recruited extensively from British Public Schools. My father had hoped for more time at bat, to put more runs on the board. His “probable” victory would never be recorded.
Historical records reveal that Fighter Command greatly exaggerated the success of its “Circus” missions. From June to the end of December 1941. It claimed 731 Luftwaffe aircraft were brought down, against a real Luftwaffe loss of 154 aircraft, 51 of which were not lost to RAF action. In fact, Fighter Command claimed 51 pilots were shot down by June 1941 but another 411 were lost by years’ end, a greater loss than July to October 1940. Defenders of home ground have the edge over attackers. This time the Germans had the advantage. In hindsight, the “Circus” operations had a deficit effect; the aircraft involved would have been better employed in the Middle and Far East. I doubt if my father gave much thought to the policy of which he was now a casualty awaiting transportation to prison camp. His focus was on survival and escape.
Three planes from the squadron did not return from the mission, the names of the pilots recorded dispassionately in the daily log.

But the RAF was meticulous in their response to the bereaved or families of the missing. British lost … service personnel in WW2. Casualties against insurgencies throughout the British Commonwealth continued for the next decades As a result the Armed Services developed their own bureaucratic procedures to ensure next of kin were promptly informed and their needs met. Upon notification of a KIA or MIA or POW, an action checklist would swing into place requiring departmental countersignatures at each stage.

 

The War Office took the dependents of serving men seriously. Taking care of the women behind the men was important to maintaining the morale of the country., and you I’m going to show how the RAF handled the process in its communications with my mother. First 242 Squadron reported the “Missing” to the Air Ministry, with name and address of next of kin, with advice that she had not been informed. The Air Ministry would draft the telegram.

After my father was posted to a base near the coast, my mother was living in a converted flat above the garage at Coverack, her parent’s house. In her memoir, she recalls the moment: “I was so lonely, and of course, lived in constant terror of what the future held. Six weeks later I was awakened early one morning. My mother and an old friend stood in the doorstep. My mother’s face was actually gray, and she had been crying. She pushed the dreaded orange envelope into my hand muttering ‘ He’s only missing, darling. Only missing…’ Her voice trailed off. My heart was breaking.”

 

” I read the telegram missing.Missing, repeat, missing. I stumbled into the lounge and clasped a large picture of Eric to me, rocking backwards and forwards in a state of incoherence. My mother picks me up to drink some neat brandy, but nothing Wield the feeling of an agonizing emptiness that I felt. Only missing meant nothing to me. I have seen so many wives living in hopes for months only to be told her husband had been killed. Why should I be one of the lucky ones, how was I to live without him?“
The pain she must have felt as a newlywed is hard to imagine. A letter confirming the telegram duly followed.

The Squadron had immediately itemized her husband’s personal effects and notified her that no will had been found.

My mother like many RAF wives had to manage the pain of uncertainty, the prospect of grief. “My mind was occupied with Eric, willing him to be safe. At times I feel unexplainably happy, that he was safe. Looking back I feel there must have been telepathy between us. At other times I was again plunged into black despair. Luckily for me mother nature took over and I would sleep with no dreams, just complete black heavy sleep.”

My mother, like most British families, would listen to the German broadcasts of the most prominent Nazi propagandist William Joyce, known as “Lord Haw Haw”, who spoke nightly across the British airwaves, intending to undermine morale.  By contrast, in Nazi Germany, it was forbidden to listen to foreign broadcasts, potentially punishable by death, in the last year of the war.

In the 1930’s, William Joyce had been Director of Propaganda for the British Union of Fascists (BUF), but fled to Germany at the start of the war, and become their English language mouthpiece. Joyce’s broadcasts, delivered in a snide tone, both mocking and menacing, always began with the announcement “Germany calling, Germany calling,” Joyce urged the British people to surrender, blaming the Jews for the outbreak of war. Although listening to the broadcasts was not illegal, it was strongly discouraged.  This did not stop 6 million regular listeners and 18 million occasional listeners around the United Kingdom from tuning in. This was because Lord Haw Haw would at some point read out six or eight names of newly captured British servicemen. This ensured listenership.

Screenshot

America incorporated Lord Haw Haw into a 7 minute animated propaganda short produced by Looney Tunes, adjusting the name for the American ear. Each evening the radio in Coverack was tuned to Lord Haw Haw as he tortured the families of the recently missing. My mother found that hope dashed nightly did her no good, and her stepfather took over the monitoring of broadcasts. Eventually the International Red Cross, the established conduit for casualty information, contacted the Air Ministry.

Then on a July 5th, two and a half weeks after Squadron Leader E. T. Smith was reported shot down, a telegram mercifully arrived.

In my mother’s memoir she recalled that such was her state of dread, she had her mother open the telegram. When she heard the news, she wrote that she screamed ” Prisoner of War” over and over. I’m sure ” .unwounded repeat unwounded” resonated too. Not maimed or blinded by burns, Relief accompanied by a new sense of hope. Her husband had done his duty. Circumstances beyond his control had taken him out of the firing line, to somewhere where he could perhaps remain safe till the war’s end and come home to her. That night Lord Haw Haw announced Squadron Leader Eric Smith as one of the 6 new POWs. The family raised the Union Jack on the Coverack garden flagpole for all to see. William Joyce’s broadcasts ultimately strengthened rather than weakened British morale. Here is Joyce, shortly after being wounded during capture in May 1945. He was hanged for treason at Wandsworth Prison six months later.

Two days later the War Office communicated further relief, that the address of the prison camp where her husband was being held would soon be forthcoming so that they could write to each other. A lifeline every wartime grass widow needed.

?

The next item on the RAF agenda was the Missing Officer’s Personal Effects.

And his outstanding mess bill of Six Pounds, One Shilling, and  Six Pence.! To be deducted from his continuing salary, as remitted to his dependent.

 

Providing these belongings offered memories to the bereaved and hope for the families of the missing. I have included the pro forma chain of paperwork because reflects the RAF ‘s care and concern for those left behind. Captured servicemen were automatically granted a promotion in absentia. My father’s rank changed from Squadron Leader to Wing Commander. My mother benefitted from the increase in his salary. Now she had to face the rest of the war alone, however that might turn out in the dark days of 1941. She did what the women of Britain did. She joined the war effort.

My mother worked in a number of factories, making amp meters, tail caps and fins for bombers. She graduated to be the manager of a canteen. requiring her to do all the shopping, preparing, and washing up leaving everything clean for the night shift.

The women of England rose to the occasion in great numbers, as American women would subsequently do. Before the war’s end, the 18 year old future Queen Elizabeth The Second drove an ambulance. My mothers wartime service culminated in her graduation to manager of a canteen. requiring her to do all the shopping, preparing, and washing up leaving everything clean for the night shift. She was happy to keep busy, while she waited for my father’s safe return.

 

PRISONER OF WAR

Within a few days of capture, where he gave only name, rank, serial number, and next of kin, Squadron Leader E.T. Smith was transferred initially to POW Camp Oflag 1X A, then to Offlag V1-B. at Warburg, in Northern Germany.

 

My father never liked to talk about his experiences as a POW. He felt the war had taken away four years of his life during which he was frequently cold, hungry and in danger. The war had cost him most of his friends and some cousins. He never attended reunions. He wanted to forget the war. I have tried to piece together what his POW life was like from his brief comments on the subject, and from the accounts of others in the official records and numerous books. How Allied prisoners of war dealt with their reversal of fortune reflects the strength of character with which their generation was raised.
After disembarking from a train of cattle cars at Warburg, the prisoners were marched out to a treeless, dusty plain where the camp stretched out over three quarters of a mile, I’ve tried to imagine what my father and fellow prisoners were thinking as they trudged towards their new home. The possibility of escape was on the minds of many. It was considered a soldier’s duty to try to escape, because however futile the attempt, it would cause the enemy to divert resources intended elsewhere for their recapture, thereby impeding the efficiency of the Nazi war machine. That was an incentive, even if the likelihood of making it home was remote. This was the gate the new POWs approached.

I am sure some prisoners counted their paces to calculate the distance between the camp and a railway line, where they could possibly jump a train. My father, as a pilot with a flair for navigation, would have taken note of the camp’s geography.

Two parallel perimeter fences each 12 feet high, bracketing tangles of barbed wire. Regular perimeter guard towers displaying mounted machine guns. Signs along the wire and beside the the well guarded front gates read: HALT! LAGERGRENZE! Continuing in English: ” Camp Boundary! Prisoners trying to cross the wire will be shot at!”

Allied prisoners of war across occupied Europe were occasionally shot while trying to escape. At most camps it was infrequent, rarely at Air Force camps, but it happened. The funeral below, of a POW shot by guards at a camp near Dresden in 1944. showed guard, firing three volleys over the coffin as respect for a fallen enemy. Could the guard who shot the prisoner have been among them?

In 1939, twenty nine large huts had been hastily constructed at Warburg intended by the German Government to accommodate the amount of prisoners of war they anticipated housing before the war came to a quick end in Germany’s favor. Neville Chamberlain‘s appeasement policy caused Hitler to underestimate the British people’s willingness to fight. By late 1941, Offlag V1 B was already substantially overcrowded. With new arrivals from North Africa and the disastrous Crete campaign, the total would rise to 3000 prisoners.

All the huts contained ten large and four smaller rooms, dimly lit by acetylene lamps They had no electricity. Inadequate heating made the huts freezing cold during the harsh German winter. Double bunks lined the walls, fitted with musty, straw filled mattresses. Between 12 and 16 officers were assigned to each room, where they would be locked from dusk till dawn. Previously, six to eight occupants to a 20 foot room had been the custom. Rodent droppings littered the floors. There were reports of prisoners waking to find mice and rats running across them. Primitive outdoor sanitation, vermin, and the lice that already infested prisoners uniforms added to the risk of disease. Soon there were cases of bronchitis and diphtheria.

 

These were the conditions that my father and other POWs faced upon arrival on June 17th, 1941, which worsened as winter approached. He would be joined there in August by his friend and fellow officer from 242 Squadron, Douglas Bader, now a decorated Ace, (DSO and DFC), recently shot down over St Omer.

The ironies of war. This RAF photo, taken a few months earlier shows Bader with fellow officers admiring a cartoon emblazoned on their planes: 242 Squadron’s boot is kicking Hitler’s arse.

Soon Wing Commander Bader would have the tail of his Spitfire sheered off, not by the Luftwaffe, probably by friendly fire. In 1945, RAF Ft. Lt. Casson, who was also shot down in the same dogfight, reported the possibility in retrospect; that in the melee he mistook Bader’s plane for an ME 109, opened fire with cannon, causing the target’s tail to separate from the fuselage. Bader believed he had lost his tail by colliding with another plane, but no such damage was reported by the German side of the dogfight.
When Bader attempted to bail out, his right leg got tangled in the cockpit as the plane spiraled downwards. Unable to get it loose, he pulled the ripcord on his parachute and the force of the canopy opening snapped the straps on his trapped prosthetic limb, freeing him from the falling plane. He parachuted into Saint Omar, a town where coincidentally Bader’s father had chosen to be buried. The landing knocked him unconscious, and he was taken to the local hospital. His damaged missing leg was recovered from a field..
Bader had been pushing for more sorties to fly in late 1941 but his Wing was tired and becoming resentful of Bader’s determination to add to his score of 20 confirmed kills. Bader’s immediate superior at Fighter Command, Trafford Leigh-Mallory, was urged to withdraw a visibly tired Bader from operations. But Leigh-Mallory did not want to upset his star pilot, and allowed Bader to continue frequent missions over France. On August 9th 1941, Bader was flying without his regular wingman who had a cold that day. He became separated from his formation, and chose to attack a flight of six ME.109s without back up, shooting down two, before the law of averages finally caught up with the daredevil Ace.
Bader would spend time in three prison camps, two of which he would share with my father. The two men had known each other at Cranwell Flying School in 1930, before Bader lost his legs and left the RAF. They had reconnected in 1939 when Bader came there to be trained on the new Hurricanes and Spitfires. My father was one of his instructors, and subsequently served in the same Squadron. My mother’s memoir recalls, as 22 year old new RAF bride, how Bader’s wife Thelma had taken her under her wing at social gatherings. No doubt it was comforting to my father to hear how she was coping. Thelma Bader and Vera Smith would share the same anxieties for the next four years.
Bader’s arrival at Offlag X1B, while a perceived blow to Britain’s air war, gave camp morale a significant boost, and provided leverage to slowly get Offlag conditions improved. Bader was admired rather than resented by senior Luftwaffe officers for his 20 confirmed kills, just as WW1 German fighter ace Baron Von Richthofen was admired by the Royal Flying Corps, precursor to the RAF, a generation before. This was evident at the time of his capture.
Local Luftwaffe Colonel and ace fighter pilot Adolf Galland, together with fellow officers, two of whose planes Bader had just shot down, welcomed Bader to their airfield and received him as a friend. He was cordially invited to sit in the cockpit of Galland’s personal ME 109. Bader asked if it was possible to test the 109 by taking it for, as he put it, “ a quick spin around the airfield.” Galland reportedly laughed, and politely declined, stating he feared Bader would attempt to escape and then he would have to give chase and they would shoot at each other again. Galland would end the war a General, credited with 104 aerial victories.

Galland did notify the RAF of Bader’s damaged prosthetic, and offered safe passage if they wished to parachute in a replacement. Reich Marshall Herman Goering himself gave the green light for the operation. Churchill did not want to give Germany a public relations victory and declined. A flight of six Blenheim bombers were dispatched – Circus 81 – to drop the replacement right leg over Saint Omar, on their way to another target. Here’s the operational report.

It was dropped in a Red Cross crate.

This German photo has Bader receiving the prosthetic limb which has a flexible knee joint. Bader would return the favor in 1945 when he met Galland, then himself a prisoner of war. One of Galland’s fellow POWs was an amputee, Hans-Ulrich Rudel, Germany’s most decorated fighter pilot. Bader arranged for Rudel to be fitted with the latest artificial leg.

I imagine in their first conversation, Bader and my father would have exchanged notes about their shared parachuting experience. They were now eligible to be members of the Caterpillar Club, formed in 1922 for men who bailed out of a disabled aircraft, all beneficiaries of the silkworm.

It had been a textbook chute exit, in my father’s case. In Bader’s, it helped to have a disposable leg. Walking round their new environment, both men would have discussed the future of the war, and what part they could play in it. There was a high level of RAF involvement in escapes from WW 2 prison camps. Those who have tasted the freedom of flight are driven all the more to escape the confinement of a cage.  Both Bader and my fathe joined the Escape Committee, and became involved in separate attempts to get beyond the wire.

Bader had re-enlisted in the RAF to distinguish himself in combat. Now as a POW, he was going to distinguish himself as an escapee, and a legless one at that. Initially, Bader and two others tried cutting through the wire with home made wire cutters at a blind spot in the camp’s perimeter, but they only got a few feet before a warning shot was fired. He had already made one escape attempt from hospital after his capture, and remaining free for a number of hours. Bader’s new duty was, as he put it, “ to be as big a bloody nuisance to the Germans as possible.” Eventually his multiple escape attempts would cause the commandant of Colditz Castle to threaten to take away his legs.
Bader would regularly engage in what he called ‘goon baiting.” mocking the guards as they passed. The German guards, unaware of the derogatory connotation, willingly accepted the nickname after being told it stood for “German Officer Or Non-Com”. A frequent target was Lieutenant Hagar, a hardline Nazi, who one day lost patience and ordered a guard to slam his rifle butt down on Bader’s foot, unaware of his artificial legs. Instead of a cry of pain, derisive laughter from Bader caused Hagar public humiliation. Although a prisoner of war, Wing Commander Bader outranked Lt. Hager, and was entitled to be saluted by him. Bader complained to Hagar’s superior Major Rademacher, who required an apology from Hagar, but still sent Bader to “the cooler “.
Another dedicated “goonbaiter” was Flying Officer Peter Tunstall, a POW since Dunkirk, who managed to achieve by war’s end the record number of 416 days in the cooler for his escape and “goon baiting” infractions. Tunstall and Douglas Bader would have a fortuitous meeting in Offlag V1 B.

 

In case of his possible capture while on ops over France, the resourceful Flying Officer Tunstall and his fiancee Ann Doul had arranged a system of secret communication, using a form of invisible ink, undetectable by those who examined prisoners’ outgoing mail. Tunstall could then pass on information about his condition that enemy censors would have inked out. Bader suggested that Tunstall’s next letter to his fiancee should contain a message from Bader to be passed on to his wife Thelma, who in turn would ensure it would quickly reach the right desk at the War Office. Bader and Tunstall collaborated on multiple messages during their time together at Offlag XVB and Colditz. Here’a an example of a letter from Colditz sent by Tunstall and Bader to Tunstall’s fiancee. It was despatched in an envelope which passed German scrutiny before being passed on to Britain via the Red Cross.

Inside was an innocuously worded letter and a photograph. The photographic paper has been carefully split and the message – written on a sheet of tracing paper – inserted.

Note the writing follows the dark part of the image to remain hidden.

Bader’s messages, relayed by Ann Doul, to Thelma Bader were recorded in War Office files. Here is the third 1942 message recorded “by this method.”

This was useful nutritional information for the Red Cross. Confirmation that German citizens were disobeying Hitler and listening to BBC radio would have been encouraging too. Typically Bader, proponent of the Big Wing and supporter of Lord Trenchard’s campaign for massive bombing raids, also offered war policy advice. Tunstall’s accompanying letter provided a series of instructions to his fiancee, as to how she could create similarly invisible messages, concealed in her mail to him. The enterprising Tunstall also suggested his fiancee could use this opportunity to apply for a job in intelligence.

This example of classic spy craft reflects the ingenuity of that WW2 generation who knew how to fix things and invent workarounds as needed. Luckily this subterfuge was not discovered, otherwise Tunstall and Bader could have been accused of espionage.
Code provided a two way street of information for the War Office. One POW camp received a request via coded letter: Find out the thickness of the armor on the then new German Tiger tank. Resourceful POWs found a way. They contacted a Polish national brought into the camp for some maintenance work; he then contacted the Polish Underground Movement, which had people actually working in one of the factories that made the tanks.
Both Tunstall and Bader regularly clashed with Rademacher who POWs described as a strutting, jackbooted Nazi, According to reports he would occasionally become unhinged, pull out his Luger pistol, wave it around while yelling at the prisoners, casually loosing off a shot or two into the air. Rademacher was hated for prolonging roll calls in freezing weather, and for his so-called “bastard searches”, which focused on prisoner’s personal belongings. If Rademacher found contraband, or signs of escape involvement, he would become enraged and order the prisoners’ bedding and belongings to be thrown outside their hut in the rain. Among other petty cruelties, offenders’ toothpaste were squeezed out onto their blankets.The daily indignities of incarceration, the years of cold, hunger, and the uncertainties of war had its cumulative effect on all POWs. Most returned to their homes in reasonable, if undernourished, physical condition, but their psychological damage from prolonged incarceration under these conditions, a kind of creeping PTSD, was not understood for many years after the war.

The rank and file guards were a mostly men deemed medically unfit for front line duty, battle invalids, missing fingers or an eye, or disfigured by burns. Several were over age WW1 veterans. Ew were hard line Nazis. The guards knew this was a whole lot better duty than the Russian front.They just hoped for an a quiet war. Some were susceptible to bribery.
The extremely cold winter of 1941 set in. The camp Commandant Sturtzcopf, fearing the outbreak of typhus, finally exterminated the fleas and vermin, In time the Germans built new brick buildings to ease overcrowding. and increased the supply of Red Cross food parcels. They added a library of 400 books, and a football ground which became a hockey field in winter. The Germans believed sports were the way POWs would burn off pent up energy and thus divert their attention from escaping.

Sports and literature had benefits outside of morale. Coded messages in prisoner’s letters could be devised from the classics of Shakespeare and Dickens. Sporting equipment could be repurposed for escape. POWs derived sustaining comfort from attempting or supporting escape attempts, thereby continuing the war by other means. My father initially became involved in tunneling, which he would continue when moved to Stalag Luft 3. He had learned basic carpentry and woodwork as a teenager in New Zealand, useful for converting bed boards into tunnel shoring. The pre-war skills of the entire camp were re-activated.
Expertise in forgery was particularly valuable. Documents were “borrowed” from corruptible guards. Foreign workers allowed access to the camp were helpful, in exchange for cigarettes, chocolate, or Red Cross food parcels. The most desired documents included a Kennkarte, a light grey general identity card , a Urlaubscheine, a yellow form used as a leave chit for foreign workers , a Ruckkehrscheine, a pink form for foreign workers returning home, Some were almost as complex as a bank note and required weeks of work. This black market traffic produced cameras, film, wood working tools, even a totally verboten radio, enabling the Escape committee to listen to BBC Radio broadcasts and discreetly pass on war news to the camp. Draftsmen forged travel documents and maps, tailors created civilian clothing, engineers designed rudimentary compasses for navigation, cooks prepared high caloric biscuits for the escapers, all in support of a massive co-ordinated operation below and above ground.,
On the night of 30 August 1942, Squadron Leader Eric T Smith was one of forty one men, in four teams, who rushed the wire of Offlag V1 B with ladders.

The double perimeter fence of barbed wire was constructed around wooden frames, set about 8 feet apart and around twenty feet in height. At the bottom, in the gap in between the fencing, a further thick tangle of barbed wire had also been positioned. Guards patrolled inside and outside the wire day and night. Escapes of more than 20 people were the prized objective. This would cause German troops to be diverted from other duties to their recapture. Each prison camp had its own escape committee. who would vet all proposals, select the ones with the best chance, then co-ordinate the personnel and logistics. Escape had to be a military exercise. Think of it as a non-combatant commando raid – in reverse; breaking out of, rather than into, a secure enemy facility, and vanishing undiscovered. To prepare and execute such a complex mission under the watchful eyes of those dedicated to its prevention required all the disciplines of warcraft, with the notable exception of violence. If a German civilian or soldier was ever hurt or killed in an escape, Allied POW’s relationship with their captors would change forever.
The Warburg Wire Job, as it came to be known, was the brainchild of Royal Engineers officer Jock Hamilton-Baillie. Wounded and captured in France, he had successfully escaped from two camps, before being recaptured yards from the Swiss border, then sent to Offlag V 1 B. This baleful mug shot adorned his POW ID papers. A man clearly discontented with imprisonment.

The Offlag V1 B escape committee was looking for new ideas beyond tunneling, since a recent heavy rainstorm had caused a tunnel to collapse shortly before completion. Months of work to no avail. Going over rather than under the wire was the only alternative, but no one yet had worked out a way. Then Jock Hamilton-Baillie devised a bold plan to build of a set of four ‘hinged’ ladders to be placed leaning against the inner wire and straddle the two barbed wire perimeter fences at the edge of the camp, during a period when the camp’s perimeter lights and searchlights were shut down. Never been tried before, probably the last thing the Germans were expecting – was probably the pitch. Hamilton-Bailie had been fascinated by medieval siege warfare at school, and he saw its application of similar techniques to escape, To show how it worked, he and two other officers, built a detailed working scale model which they presented to the Escape Committee. In a Utube video, Hamilton-Baillie’s son, Ben demonstrates his fathers invention with a replica of the scale model Jock Hamilton-Baillie presented to the escape committee.

It’s an excellent explanation which I summarize here: The ladders were ingenious in both construction and improvisation of materials. The apparatus was in two halves which fitted together – the first a simple ladder with widely spaced rungs and a hook at the top to engage the overhang of barbed wire. The other part was a basic running board, with duckboards and a swing bar at the far end for the men to hang on to and drop off the remaining eight feet to the ground.. The two parts fitted neatly together, one on top of the other whilst they were hidden away. It was estimated that the ladder apparatus could be assembled in about fifteen seconds and fifteen men could get over in ninety seconds. It was to be constructed out of long, two inch thick timbers taken from a hut’s ceiling and bed boards.

 

When the lights were fused, the ladders were to be carried out and leaned against the top of the inner fence, and hooked into place over the wire. The running board section which fitted over the basic ladder was pushed up and until it cantilevered across the wires to rest on the top of the outer fence. Short ropes on either side of the ladder and duckboard section were tethered to the wire to prevent the two sections from further movement.

130 feet of timber was needed for each apparatus. 100 nails and 12 feet of rope to be acquired, assembled, and hidden. As the two joined sections slotted rigidly in place, the plan was for a team of fifteen men to climb the ladder, crawl along d the duckboard, and jump off after swinging on the trapeze bar at the other end, so they were close enough to the ground to drop without injuring themselves.
The Warburg Wire Job, or Zero Night as it came to be known, was part of a two pronged mass escape, with a simultaneous break out by tunnel. A new one had been started with a lighting system tapping into camp power to facilitate the digging. The target was to get 150 prisoners out scattering across the countryside, causing German troops to be diverted from other duties.
Before such an ambitious escape could go into full scale operation, a foolproof plan to sabotage the camp lights had to be developed, otherwise rushing the wire would be suicide.
Major B D Skelton ‘Skelly’ Ginn, an officer with some knowledge of electrical engineering, took regular walks along the fence line, noting the visible portions of wiring circuits for the perimeter’s floodlights, the guard tower searchlights, and sentry box telephones.
Major Ginn noted one of the floodlighting poles had a major unfused spur line that connected to all the perimeter defenses. It was also connected to a wooden hut near the wire that housed a cobbler‘s workshop, the camp’s sewing machines, and a barber’s shop on the north side of the camp. The Germans as a goodwill gesture permitted prisoners access by day, so they could get their uniforms and boots repaired, and obtain regular hair cuts. Due to the spur line’s inept installation, the Germans had inadvertently provided electricity savvy prisoners with the ability to sabotage the main electrical control panel in the German guard room. It would be possible for prisoners to control the local perimeter lights if they could gain access to the cobblers’ workshop at will.
By day, prisoners were permitted entry to the cobblers’ hut to conduct their repairs watched by an armed sentry just inside the door. From a hook on the sentry’s belt, dangled the iron key to the hut. The first step was to copy the key.
Two intrepid officers, Moulson and Searle, volunteered for the mission. This incident has been dramatized in a number of World War Two movies. But I doubt if these scenes adequately reflect the tension these men must have felt in the minutes leading up to the surreptitious snatch, and quick replacement of a forbidden item, the penalty for which could be court martial, a long spell in the cooler, and possible transfer to a concentration camp if the authorities wanted to set an example. The operation required planning and several rehearsals, using other prisoners of war as role players to create the necessary distraction to the guard. One fumble, and German attention would be drawn to what prisoners intended at the cobblers’ hut, which could be fatal to the escape plan.
The cobblers’ hut offered a social venue as well as a repair center. It was crowded with officers, chatting and joking, as mallets hammered and tools whirred. Noise would assist in distraction. Moulson and Searle sidled up behind the guard on duty,, and studied how the keys hung from the hook on his belt. On a signal from Searle, two of the team then created an argument nearby; angry shouting developed into pushing and shoving. The guard stepped forward to separate them. The POW support team crowded round. In the jostling scrum, the guard was unaware of being relieved of his key. Searle was the the pickpocket, passing the key to Moulson who immediately pressed both sides into a tobacco tin filled with homemade wax, which was created by melting German ersatz soap and Red Cross margarine together . Within seconds a wax impression was made, before the key was replaced on the hook of the guard’s belt. Within a day a duplicate key was created by one of the camp’s amateur locksmiths.
Moulson and Searle were electrical engineers. They devised a simple hand made device involving a pair of arcing horns they would attach to the incoming power cables that fed the various machine tools in the cobblers hut. In theory, a metal shorting bar mounted at the end of a long insulating wooden pole could be laid across the arcing horns, blowing targeted fuses on the main control panel in the adjacent guard house. In this way, some or all of the camp’s power could be shut down on cue. A test was necessary.
One night in May 1941, guided by a screen of lookouts, Moulson and Searle evaded sentries and infiltrated the cobblers hut. In their rucksacks they carried dark cloths to black out the windows so they could work by torchlight. They brought insulating wire, removed from the camp’s PA loudspeakers used to disseminate Nazi propaganda. Aluminum rodding and copper were purloined from the service truck that came to repair the loudspeakers. They tested their device to short out only a designated section of the perimeter, so the Germans would regard it as an anomalous glitch. To maintain the secret, Moulson and Searle removed all trace of their activities, even sprinkling wiring they had replaced with dust that they had collected in a small tin, so the wiring looked untouched. They slipped away, locking the door behind them with the duplicate key. So much attention to detail.
They learned that it took the Germans 30 minutes to repair the blown fuses in the adjacent guard house and restore the flood lights, a bonus that would add further time to the the blackout obscuring the escapers. Next a secure place needed to be found for storage of the scaling ladders and training in their use.
The camp authorities allowed prisoners to form musical groups, including an orchestra, a jazz band, and a choir. They designated a hut for this purpose, and permitted musical instruments to be sent into the camp. The scaling ladders were hidden in plain sight, attached to the walls as shelving for sheet music and instruments. This ruse evaded detection by Major Rademacher on two occasions. Four separate teams of eleven men each trained on the rapid assembly and deployment of the apparatus.
Materials for the three other climbing structures would be stored at huts adjacent to the designated escape points. Each apparatus was dyed purple with indelible lead dye for camouflage. Again, such attention to detail. would take place on the day of the escape. By then all four teams would be fully trained in placing the ladder in the dark, clambering up the widely spaced rungs, navigating the duckboard, grasping the swing bar, and dropping to the ground, before the Germans realize an escape was in progress.. The goal was: up and over in 90 seconds.
Once over the wire, the hard part would begin. Escape on foot through hundreds of miles of enemy territory to a neutral country, living rough, traveling mainly at night, would require physical fitness and stamina. Escapers trained for months and were given additional rations to build up a reserve of strength for the journey. Crossing enemy territory would also require authentic looking documents. Forgery was therefore a valuable skill at Oflag V1 B., Documents were stolen or “borrowed” from a prison guard in return for goods lifted from Red Cross food supply storeroom, pictured below. POWs became adept at scrounging, pilfering, bribing susceptible guards and foreign workers, with Red Cross parcels, chocolate, cigarettes.

A brief peek into the weeds of POW forgery: The ” acquired document” was then reproduced by teams of experts, before being returned to the nervous guard or foreign worker before his shift changed. To carry out forgery in secret, a stool and something to serve as a small table were placed on top of a larger table, so that the work could be brought as close as possible under the none too bright electric light. A blanket covered the window so that patrolling guards could not see through any chinks in the shutters that were clamped across the windows at night.

The three most desired documents were a Urlaubscheine, a yellow form used as a leave chit for foreign workers; a Ruckkehrscheine, a pink form for foreign workers returning home; a Kennkarte, a general identity card.. These were as a complex as banknotes and some required weeks of work to reproduce. A POW’s photograph would then replace the original.

The authentic documents were copied on tracing paper in meticulous detail. The forged documents were created mainly with brush and Indian ink. Here’s a September 1944 Polish Identity Card , and the POW forgery made from it, back dated to June, ready to be filled out with a new name.

Another example of a forged travel pass. Before and after.

 

Official police stamps were difficult to fake by hand painting. Convincing metal stamps were eventually created by etching aluminum, cut from a camp cooking utensil, with acid. Cellulose paint obtained from the camp theatre group provided a suitable substance to act as an acid resister for the design. Ordinary table jelly from Red Cross parcels was used as the ink transfer medium.

After drawing the design on the aluminum with the cellulose paint, the background was etched down using hydrochloric acid, a substance the camp authorities had supplied to clean the latrine. Heavily strained jelly provided the base. when the jelly sets, they could edge the map details. Ink made from indelible pencils. A reliable compass could be made using a magnetized needle set On a cork swivel a small speck of luminous paint from the face of a broken wrist watch was glued to the tip of the needle to indicate north at night.

Relationships that POWs created with sympathetic foreign workers generated useful items of contraband, such as cameras, and film, to create fake identity cards.

In October 1941, a radio receiver was smuggled in. Senior British officers could now get access to BBC broadcasts, and pass on war news to the prisoners. This helped keep up morale.
The whole camp was a collective support system for escapologists. Some monitored guard movements, others provided distractions, to divert guards attention away from POWs infiltrating restricted areas. Douglas Bader would sometimes engage guard tower sentries’ attention by taking off his artificial legs in full view.
Next came the planning of the escape routes, and which POWs would be chosen for the four teams. Records indicate Squadron Leader E. T. Smith was assigned to Team Four.

A simultaneous breakout by tunnel was almost ready, but it would come to a tragic halt on the morning of the planned escape. POW Lt. Dupree, was extending a jerry-rigged lighting system in the tunnel , when he accidentally touched a live cable and was electrocuted. During the unsuccessful rescue attempt, the Germans discovered the tunnel. The escape committee considered postponement out of respect, but decided this was the only night. WW2 historian Mark Felton’s book Zero Night gives an extensive account of the escape, with eye witness accounts from a number of the survivors, but other than my father’s place on Team 4, he is not mentioned.
I often wondered how my father and the other members of Team 4 felt while waiting those final minutes for the Go signal. I imagine they must have been constantly reviewing their escape plans, their route to a neutral country, making sure all travel documents are in order, provisions packed. Tension, A sense of excitement at the prospect of being on active service for their country again. But my father spoke very little about the escape. Perhaps he did not to depict war as glorious to his son by recounting his part in heroic acts..
The assault on the wire was scheduled for 9:20 PM.
At 9:25 the camp lights went out.
At the opposite end of the camp to where the wire would actually be scaled , the planned diversion went into operation. Two ladders, painted white to catch sentries attention, were leaned against the fence. Grappling hooks embedded in the wire at several points were pulled by unseen hands . Long sections of the fence rippled as the wires vibrated through the holes in their supporting posts, giving the impression that multiple ladders were being mounted along the wire. To add to the confusion, two British officers with German speaking skills began shouting contradictory orders to the sentries running to investigate. In nearby hats, prisoners in the middle of the camp began playing the musical instruments, banging drums, creating a cacophony to disguise the sound at the opposite side of the camp of the scaling apparatus being raised into place and men clambering over the wire.
The first three teams had no problems, and 32 men got up the ladders, across the wire, and scattered across the adjacent field. However, Team Four suffered bad luck. After two men had made it across, my father was next in line. As he began the crossing, the ropes locking the duck board bridge to the ladder failed. The duck board tipped, and my father fell between the wires. Sentries fired randomly into the darkness. He told me he heard bullets impacting the sand nearby.
One response to a mass escape could have been machine gun fire from the guard towers, spraying the darkened field, but the escape committee calculated that guards would refrain from indiscriminate fire outside the perimeter in order to protect the German patrols known as “Deep Field.” But individual sentries might shoot at a fleeing figure. It was a risk the escapees were prepared to take. As it it turned out, only one POW running from the wire was wounded in the heel. A “Deep Field” patrol inevitably caught 4 of the escapees. 32 POWs vaulted the wire. 6 were recaptured within minutes, 26 became “gone aways” in POW parlance. 23 of them would be caught over subsequent days and weeks. Major Albert Arkwright, Captain Rupert Fuller and Major Francis Edwards. made it back home after finally crossing the Pyrenees via the Comete Escape Line. My father, made it to the cooler, where he spent many days on bread and water. The luck of the game.

The camp authorities took these pictures the next day.

How my father coped with this disappointing outcome after months of training , I do not know. Growing up, I watched him take life’s disappointments quietly with little complaint, never to brood, but to shrug, and keep trying in his endeavors. It was an attitude that served him well his entire life. In the cooler, he probably reflected on how close he had once again come to death. From a historical perspective, one wonders what might have happened if the tragically curtailed tunnel escape had also gone ahead that night as planned, releasing maybe a hundred or more Allied POWs into the German countryside? Would Hitler’s deadly response to the mass escape in 1944 have been provoked in 1942 if the Warburg Wire Job had released more than 32 prisoners? Luckily the captured escapees were not treated badly, beyond a spell in the cooler. And three men made it to freedom, a morale booster to the Home Front.

 

Released from the cooler, my father returned to the monotony of captivity. He said little about these days other than “cold, tired, and hungry”. He rejoined the general support system for escapers. He probably gained further experience in tunneling. But none of the tunnels came to fruition. When the Germans detected a tunnel, identified its path, they allowed it to continue till they judged it had reached just beyond the perimeter. Then they would drive heavy trucks back and forth beside the wire shaking the ground till the tunnel collapsed exposing itself.
My father believed it was his duty as an RAF officer to pursue the war by the only means available. When another disruptive escape was planned, he was going to be part of it.
Meanwhile the war ground on. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. In solidarity, Germany joined Japan in declaring war on America, an ultimately catastrophic decision by Hitler. America’s entry into the war boosted POW morale throughout 1942. There was now hope that the tide would turn.

But there were setbacks. POWs learned of the Allied raid on the French coastal port of Dieppe from the nearly 2,000 were taken prisoner. 1000 Canadian and British troops were killed, 2400 wounded in an intelligence operation overseen by Lord Mountbatten and future James Bond writer Ian Fleming to capture an Enigma decoding machine.

However, POWs recognized Dieppe was a trial run at landing on an enemy beachhead, from which lessons for the full scale invasion of Europe would be learned. Dieppe was a salutary lesson in worst case scenarios…They included….

Hopes for substantial progress came in November 1942.

Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery emerged as Britain’s leading General with his decisive victory over Rommel’s Afrika Corps in the Libyan desert.

A British magazine published this cartoon mocking Ribbentrop’s claim in 1941.

In charge of security for the camp’s illicit radio, my father would have been among the first to hear the BBC News broadcast of Mongomery’s victory at El Alamein. Libya now provided the springboard for the invasion of Italy.

STALAG LUFT THREE

In April 1943, my father was transferred to Stalag Luft Three, in Silesia, Poland, a major new camp for Allied Prisoners of War, which now included Americans. Here’s an RAF aerial view in 1944. Spanning sixty acres, the camp housed a total of 10,949 RAF and USAF prisoners in separate compounds.

Thick pine forests flanked all sides of the camp. The only other evidence of civilization was a small road which ran off toward the nearby town of Sagan.The site was selected for its loose sandy soil, impeding the structural integrity of any tunnel the POWs might dig. Barracks housing POWs were constructed 24 inches off the ground. Seismograph microphones were placed around the perimeter of the camp to detect any sounds of digging. The North Compound consisted of fifteen wooden huts, each one divided into sixteen rooms which housed around eight men, plus three sets of private quarters for senior officers. The compound itself was a square of about a 1000 feet in both directions, hemmed in by two layers of barbed-wire and guard towers positioned at regular intervals. Armed guards manned the towers night and day, and patrols continuously circled the perimeter. A warning wire ran close to the inner fence. The prisoners were warned not to stray beyond that wire under threat of death.
The German guards that specialized in escape detection were known as ‘Ferrets’. They could search any hut without warning. Using metal probes, they looked for traces of yellow sand indicating that a tunnel was in progress, or an English-speaking Ferret would lie concealed under a hut listening for careless talk. Their most active, unpredictable, and feared member, Gefreiter (Corporal) Greise, was known as ‘Rubberneck’.

Detected tunnels were allowed to continue without intervention until it appeared to be near completion. Then, the ferrets would pounce, driving heavy trucks around the compound to collapse the tunnel.
This picture illustrates the deterrent to wire cutting escapers. Given his experience on the Warburg Wire Job, my father‘s next attempt would be to go under the wire.

Douglas Bader was also moved to Stalag Luft Three. by August1942. But he was gone by the time my father arrived. Bader’s physical condition made his likelihood of reaching a neutral country remote. The Escape Committee turned down the various schemes he submitted. Bader channeled his frustrations into “goon baiting”, which sometimes resulted in excessively long role calls in cold weather, and a growing unpopularity within the camp. Within three months he was transferred to another camp at Lamsdorf. After a failed escape attempt there, was sent to the escape proof Colditz Castle, till the end of the war. Here he is seated at the center of the front row. Naturally.

Stalag Luft Three would eventually hold 10,000 prisoners of war on 59 acres with 5 miles of perimeter fencing .

Living conditions were an improvement on Offlag V1 B. Here’s a group of RAF officers who have made their cramped quarters as functional as possible.

As Kommandant the Luftwaffe appointed Freidrick Von Lindeiner, 61 an educated man, who spoke good English. Lindeiner joined the army in 1908. In World War 1, he was wounded three times .and was twice awarded the Iron Cross. In 1919 he married a Dutch Baroness. In 1937 he joined the Luftwaffe in 1937 as a member of Goering’s personal personal staff. He was old school, a patriotic German but not a Nazi idealogue.

In May 1942 Goering posted him to Sagan as Kommandant of Stalag Luft Three. Goering knew that escapes were inevitable, particularly among flyers, butbthey must not become embarrassing. Von Lindeiner believed that the best way to discourage escapes was to improved ration and expand social amenities. Then prisoners would see the wisdom of waiting out the war in tolerable conditions without taking further risks with their lives. To assist in creating a sense of society, he allowed POWs to have their own currency.

Red cross parcels of medical supplies increased.

Athletic and competitive sports events were a regular fixture. County Cricket matches were held just as they would have been in British towns and villages every summer Sunday.

United States Air Force officers and crew shot down in bombing raids over occupied Europe had been arriving at Stalag Luft Three in increasing numbers.

These pictures were taken at the new South compound to which the USAF POWs were moved. There were two toilets per forty men.

POWs were encouraged to spend time in a substantial library with schooling facilities, where they could study languages, engineering, even law. The exams in those subjects were supplied by the Red Cross and supervised by former academics, including a Master of King’s College, who became a POW in Stalag Luft Three. The prisoners used the camp amplifier to broadcast a news and music radio station they named Station KRGY, Kriegie being short for Kriegsgefengener , the German term for prisoner of war. Two newspapers, The Circuit and Kriegie Times were issued four times a week.

American airmen were swelling the numbers of arrivals. Some left pregnant wives behind. This newspaper for the American section of the camp celebrated recent new borns.

An important development in keeping POW spirits up was Lindeiner’s permission for them to build a fully professional live theatre and cinema. The Red Cross supplied materials, and 16mm prints of movies. By providing the distraction of regular entertainment they enjoyed before captivity, Lineiner hoped to divert their energies away from escape. A POW sketched the design.

Lindeiner imposed conditions – the theater could never be used for escape attempts. The British agreed. (There was a slight fudging of this rule, as revealed later) The Red Cross supplied materials, and 16mm prints of movies. The prisoners put on bi-weekly performances featuring all the current shows playing on London’s West End Theaters. Libretti and music scores were supplied through the Red Cross. Special performance were staged for German personnel.

Performances in female attire were popular.

Several POW’s who performed at these shows would become successful actors after the war, and were often in movies and TV shows I would see growing up in England, unaware they had shared the same prison camp as my father.

Denholm Elliot (multi award winning actor – Trading Places, 2 Indiana Jones movies) formed a theatre group that was so successful it toured other POW camps playing Twelfth Night,

Donald Pleasance, ( Halloween, You Only Live Twice, among 242 screen roles ) was a wireless operator for Bomber Command. After flying nearly sixty missions, his Lancaster was shot down over France. He became a POW at Stalag Luft Three a few months after the actual escape. Decades later Pleasance had become a star character actor and was cast as ‘ the forger’ in the movie version of The Great Escape. On the set, he offered director John Sturges some advice on authenticity. He was politely told to keep his “opinions” to himself. When Sturges found out the actor had direct experience in a real POW camp, he apologized and requested his input. Before the war, Pleasance had only acted for a small repertory theater before enlisting. At Stalag Luft Three, he produced and acted in many plays and sketch shows, some alongside a Royal Navy officer Peter Butterworth. who had survived ditching in the North Sea before capture.

Throughout his imprisonment, Fleet Air Arm Pilot Officer Butterworth provided support to many escape attempts, including the one portrayed by the book and film “The Wooden Horse”, in which prisoners dug a tunnel concealed under a vaulting horse positioned near the perimeter fence.

Butterworth was one of team the vaulters who would practice gymnastics for hours,. Guards would pass by, oblivious to the tunnel being dug beneath.

Made from plywood Red Cross parcels, the horse was carried out each day with tunnelers concealed inside. carried back to their hut hours later, with the earth they had excavated. Butterworth and other POWs concealed bags of earth inside their clothing, and walked around dispersing trickles of soil unnoticed by guards. Butterworth later auditioned for the movie in 1949 but “didn’t look convincingly heroic or athletic enough” according to the makers of the film.

Butterworth, teamed up with Pilot Officer Talbot Rothwell, a town clerk and policeman before the war, to persuade Kommandant Lindeiner to allow them to build a theater where they could stage musical comedy shows for fellow POWs that would benefit camp morale. The Kommandant agreed, provided he theater was never used for escape attempts. ( A rule occasionally broken) Butterworth had never been a performer and Rothwell had never thought of writing before, but both men enjoyed traditional British Music Hall humor, epitomized by top pre-war acts like The Crazy Gang.

After the war Talbot Rothwell would write gags for The Crazy Gang before becoming a a successful playwright and screenwriter, penning twenty of the Carry On series that were popular in Britain during the 50’s and 60’s. Peter Butterworth became a successful comedy actor. Rothwell would cast him in sixteen of the Carry On films.

Carry On sketches that mocked authority figures, and dialogue peppered with double entendres got their start at the Stalag Luft Three Musical Theatre.

POWs would send home reports of their daily life. filtered through the camp’s censors, hoping to make their loved ones feel less anxious about their welfare. This would result in a perception among some on the home front of prisoners enjoying a comfortable life in a German holiday camp. The constant stress of captivity was not understood; some felt – they’d had it easy. Some POWs , my father among them, returning to a Britain scarred by five years of collective bereavement. My father, once liberated, could sense that POWs were not regarded in the same light as other returning servicemen who had also faced the enemy. When their stories were finally known, it became clear how much Allied escape attempts from prison camps across Europe had disrupted German troop movements.The biggest POW disruption of World War 2 – dubbed The Great Escape – would be the brainchild of RAF Squadron Leader Roger Bushell.

Roger Bushell was born in South Africa, educated at Wellington College, a British public school founded in the name of one of England’s most celebrated generals. the Duke of Wellington. By co-incidence, Wellington College would be my school too for five years in 1959. An all round sportsman, Bushell excelled at rugby, going on to captain the university skiing team, while studying law where be won the slalom event of the annual Oxford/Cambridge Ski Race in 1931. But, like my father, his real passion was the adrenalin rush of flying.
In 1932, while still qualifying as a lawyer, Bushell joined the Auxiliary Air Force, (AAF), Squadron 601, known at the time as “The Millionaires’ Mob” because of the number of wealthy young men who paid their way solely to learn how to fly during training days, often on weekends. While rising from Pilot Officer to Squadron Leader in eight years, Bushell built a reputation in criminal defense, often involving pilots charged with dangerous flying. One pilot he successfully defended, Paddy Byrne, would later be incarcerated with Bushell at Stalag Luft III. Bryne is on the right of Squadron Leader Bushell, beside Lt. Eberhardt (German security). Note the cordial smiles. The Luftwaffe had respect for fellow fliers, and treated their POW’s better than the German Army. Paddy Bryne is smiling too. He’s plotting his unique escape.

In 1944 Bryne feigned insanity so successfully that he convinced the Germans and the repatriation board that he was completely mad, and under the terms of the Geneva Convention should be be repatriated. Back in England, Byrne’s sanity immediately returned. He was readmitted to the RAF and given a ground position. It would not surprise me if his former RAF lawyer, Roger Bushell had a hand in tutoring his performance.

Pictured here days before his capture, Bushell’s first engagement with enemy aircraft came on 23 May 1940, while on patrol over Calais to assist with the Dunkirk evacuation. He was credited with damaging two ME 109s before being shot down himself He crash-landed his Spitfire on German-occupied ground and was captured before he had a chance to hide. It is said that this incident was recreated in Christopher Nolan’s movie Dunkirk, with Tom Hardy as one of the early fighter pilots to go ” into the bag.”

Escape became Bushell’s obsession. In his first attempt in 1941, he was recaptured a hundred yards from the Swiss border. His second escape involved jumping from a train, transferring POWs to another camp. as it stopped briefly in Hanover. Fellow escapee Czechoslovak Pilot Officer Jaroslav Zafouk made contact with the underground movement. A family sheltered them for eight months before being betrayed and executed by the Gestapo, including the daughter of the household with whom Bushell had become involved. Under interrogation, he was beaten by the Gestapo, then sent to Stalag Luft Three, warned that if he escaped again he would be shot. Bushell channeled his rage at Gestapo brutality into devising the most ambitious escape of the war, something Hitler would notice.
On arrival, in November 1942, Bushell was the camp’s most experienced escaper. He quickly took over control of the escape organization, known as “X”. and inherited the code name “Big X”. Big “S” , in charge of security, was an American Lt. Colonel Albert Clark. He co-ordinated the stooges, the network of POWs that monitor the guards’ movements throughout the day. In parallel the “Y” organization, was responsible for forging identity documents, creating maps, and civilian clothing, utilizing the skills of former tailors and artists. There was also Z organization, most secret branch of the escape committee, with control over the camps’ illicit radio , and the codes to communicate with RAF intelligence back in England.
Bushell’s experiences on the run for months in occupied Europe and his treatment by the Gestapo left him with an implacable hatred for the Nazis. All Germans, including Kommandant Von Lindeiner, were the same to Bushell. Drawing on the oratorical skills he acquired as a defense counsel, Bushell addressed the full escape committee and reminded them of their duty in the kind of forthright terms that would resonate with men who, like himself, had somehow survived being shot out of the sky. These are his reported words:
“Everyone here in this room is living on borrowed time. By rights, we should all be dead! The only reason that God allowed us this extra ration of life is so we can make life hell for the Hun… In North Compound we are concentrating our efforts on completing and escaping through one master tunnel. No private-enterprise tunnels are allowed. Three bloody deep, bloody long tunnels will be dug – Tom, Dick, and Harry. One will succeed!”
The most radical element of the plan was not the scale of construction, but the sheer number of men that Bushell intended to pass through these tunnels. Previous attempts had involved the escape of between 10 or 20 prisoners, but Bushell was proposing to get over 200 out, each of whom would be in civilian clothes,carrying forged papers and escape equipment. It required a massive level of organization ultimately involving 600 POWs.
Bushell introduced strict security measures. New POWs to the camp were vetted, to prevent German agents from infiltrating their ranks. Any POW who could not be vouched for by two POWs who knew the prisoner by sight was seriously interrogated and afterwards escorted by other prisoners, until deemed to be a genuine Allied POW. Several infiltrators were discovered by this method. The operation was so secretive that everyone was to refer to each tunnel only by its name. Bushell took this so seriously that he threatened to court-martial anyone who even uttered the word “tunnel”.
Every POW in the North Compound was part of the collective support system. German guards were followed everywhere they went by prisoners, known in POW vernacular as “stooges”, who used an elaborate system of signals to warn others of the guards’ location. The guards’ movements were then carefully recorded in a logbook kept by escape committee officers. Unable to stop what the prisoners called the “Duty Pilot” system, the Germans allowed it to continue and on one occasion the book was used by Commandant von Lindeiner to bring charges against two guards who had slunk away from duty several hours early. Bushell is photographed here with a fellow member of the escape committee.

When he joined the RAF in 1932, Bushell probably received flight training from my father who had just returned to Flying School as an instructor nine months after leaving as a pupil. In the 1930’s, the RAF was a relatively small and quite social organization. Over the next eight years the two men undoubtedly rubbed shoulders, particularly when Bushell received flight training on the new Hurricane and Spitfire. When they met again in Stalag Luft Three, my father joined Bushell’s corps of tunnelers. The operation would take a year.

In the 1963 movie The Great Escape, based on the book by Stalag Luft Three POW Paul Brickhill, fictional characters were created for Hollywood stars Steve McQueen and James Garner, along with fictional action scenes including Garner stealing a plane, an incident purloined from the Delousing Break which took place in June the previous year. Scenes of McQueen leaping his motorbike over barbed wire fences were written to persuade the motorbike fanatic to take the starring role. Perhaps, because of the level of fictionalization, the studio decided to change all the actual participants names. Roger Bushell, Big X, was represented by Richard Attenborough’s character, but named Roger Bartlett. The small facial scar Bushell retained from a skiing accident, was replicated in the actor’s make up. Attenborough certainly captured Bushell’s reputed hard driving style. I will summarize what was good about the movie and what was inaccurate and what my father thought about it in a later section. The true story of The Great Escape deserves the kind of in depth exploration that only a high quality streaming series can provide.
There is a wide variety of granular detail about The Great Escape available in the AIR40 section of the Public Records Office, in Kew, London. Notable is AIR40/268 which is the official history of Stalag Luft III, and other documents in the ranging from AIR40/2265 to AIR40/2293, which refer in great detail to the investigation into the aftermath of the escape, as well as fascinating minutiae of Camp life, such as correspondence between Kommandant Lindeiner and the Senior British Officer at Stalag Luft Three, and many preserved internal documents, all of which are well worth a browse. As well as the National Archives, I recommend https://www.stalagluft3.com/. So I’m just going to navigate the weeds of the operation in broad strokes, and pick out details that show the incredible ingenuity and resolve of all those involved.
Three tunnels, Tom, Dick, and Harry, were dug for the escape.
Tom began in a darkened corner next to a stove chimney in Hut 123 and aimed west into the forest. Dick’s entrance was hidden under a secure trap door in a drain sump in the washroom of Hut 122, which was searched many times by the ferrets, POW slang for tunnel detectors, but never discovered even by the most dreaded ferret, Unteroffizier Karl Griese known as Rubberneck. The entrance to Harry, hidden under a stove in Hut 104, was only found the morning after the escape.
The tunnels had to be, as Bushell put it, “bloody deep”, 30 feet below the surface to hamper tunnel detection from the buried microphones that ringed the camp. This was view from the bottom of one shaft, from where the tunnel commenced.

The sandy walls were shored up with wood scavenged from all over the camp. Of the twenty bed boards normally supporting a mattress, prisoners gave up all but eight.

At the base of the shaft, to ventilate the tunnel, chambers were dug to house a manually operated air pump and bellows made with hockey sticks, ping pong bats, and knapsacks.

The air ducts were created by soldering together hundreds of Klim powdered milk cans as piping connected to an improvised air pump and bellows. Other Klim can byproducts included scooping tools for the diggers and candle holders. The ersatz wax was made from fat skimmed off the camp soup, lit by wicks made from pyjama cords. Perhaps modern day recycling was born in Stalag Luft Three.

Tools were acquired by theft or smuggling.

The work shops excavated at the base of each shaft were used for building the timber supports for the tunnel, as well as the wooden tracks and trolleys of rudimentary railways. Running on flanged wheels, these carts were designed to get men, tools, and debris back and forth along the tunnel in a fraction of the time it would take to crawl.

Here’s a colorized but more accurate simulation of the two foot square tunnel and the sand disposal trolley it contained, being demonstrated by a German guard in the aftermath to the escape. Two feet from elbow to elbow, from chest to cranium; a tight fit for a six foot tall man like my father. Perhaps because of the number of hours he had spent in the narrow confines of a fighter plane’s fuselage, claustrophobia was not an issue. As a tennis player, he had a strong right shoulder for digging. It earned him a place among the selected escapers.

Many of the men chose to work naked. Clothing made navigating the tunnel more arduous. Makeshift showers were rigged in the washrooms so that they could quickly cleanse any signs of being underground. Once electric light was installed, the average daily progress on each tunnel was seven to eight feet. The work was divided into two shifts. The first was the actual digging, which usually took place between morning appell (9.30 a.m.) and evening appell (around 5.30 p.m). The second shift which went on into the night concentrated on the disposal of the earth excavated that day. Those tasked with this responsibility were known as Penguins, due to the greatcoats they wore to conceal bags of sand. They would potter about, periodically joining other POWs tilling vegetable gardens. During conversation the Penguin would pull a drawstring on a bag in his trousers or greatcoat, let the sand trickle down, then inconspicuously trample a sand into the fresh earth. My father did his share of Penguin duty. At times when snow covered the ground, the sand was stashed beneath the camp theater, via a hinged seat in the back row.

Camp Kommandant Lindeiner knew that an escape was in preparation. Since the opening of Stalag Luft Three, 97 tunnels had been discovered. It was to be expected. In parallel with the tunneling, Bushell organized a distraction: a smaller mass break out, known as the “Delousing Break. On 12 June 1943. twenty six officers officers escaped by leaving the camp to go to the showers for delousing in the neighboring compound. They were escorted by two fake guards played by POWs in specially created authentic uniforms. Twenty four were recaptured and returned to the camp. The remaining two officers, who had played the guards, were sent to Colditz for trying to steal an aircraft, referenced earlier. The use of fake uniforms and painted rifles carved from furniture was attempted in a number of Allied escapes. In this propaganda picture, German guards wearing the captured men’s greatcoats demonstrate their error. They had made the greatcoats too short.

Bushell was unaware that the Delousing Break had reinforced German efforts to curtail POW escapes, which followed a breakout attempt of 43 British and Dominion airmen from a camp near Poznan in March 1943. This brought about the first wartime Grossfahndung conducted in Germany, best described as a nationwide hue and cry. All branches of the security apparatus were mobilized. Directed by the Reichssicherheitshauptamt HQ in Berlin, the Gestapo operated nationwide as the Secret State Police. Subordinate to the Gestapo were the local police, Kriminalpolizei, the equivalent of America’s FBI or the British CID. Units of the Wehrmacht that could also be mustered to hunt escapees.. Escaped officers’ photographs were published in the German Police Gazette.

The Grossfahndung resulted in arrests across occupied Europe; escaped prisoners of war 809, foreign workers who had left their assigned work places 8,281, other persons wanted by the police 4,825. By this stage of the war the German labor force had been depleted by continuous drafts to her armies. Germany and occupied Europe were filled with large numbers of foreign workers, in addition to prisoners of war from France, Russia, Britain the Commonwealth. The increasing numbers of slave laborers on the run, the rise of resistance groups, and escapes from multiple camps began to cause concern over internal security in Berlin.. They were aware that some POW camps had smuggled in radios, and could hear BBC’s coded messages. Could these escapes have been co-ordinated from London? Could escaped officers link up with partisans to direct sabotage? Were POWs being used to carry on war as a fifth column under cover of their non-combatant status? Actually, there was no such coordination, escapes were a natural result of imprisonment, but paranoia was a fact of life in 1943 Berlin. Heindrich Himmler, chief of the SS. and Reichminister of the Interior, assumed overall control of POW security. He initiated changes in the laws regarding Prisoners of War.
The Igel Order stated that, ‘prisoners moved in bulk must be chained’. In February 1944, the Stufe Römisch III Order stated that, ‘escaping POWs should not be automatically returned to their camps but held in special detention pending consideration of each individual case’ . In early March 1944, another order was issued, stating that ‘all non-British or American recaptured escapers should be sent to Mauthausen concentration camp with a letter “K” appended to their name’. Ostensibly it designated the man a Kreige. In fact it was code . Such prisoners should be immediately executed. It seems Hitler was ready to execute escaping American POWs, but not, as yet, the British. This was the uncertain climate into which Bushell’s multi tunnel escape plan was heading.

In the prisoners’ cartoon, note the rope attached to the tunneler’s ankle, warning of a possible search by ferrets. And collapses did occur. Tunnelers always had back up. Dim candlelight made the going slow, till a resourceful Canadian officer, Joe Noble, pilfered about 600 feet of electric cable from local workmen, hacking it into the camp’s electricity supply, thus providing a simple lighting system within Harry. The three Germans responsible for the wire were later shot by the authorities, as an example for not disclosing its loss. But there were guards who were anti-Nazi and actively assisted prisoners, smuggling in civilian clothing, railway timetables, maps and documents to forge, particularly identity cards.
e l

Official Nazi rubber stamps were created by hand carving counterfeit plates Without papers that would pass inspection, an escaper had no chance of reaching a neutral country, and the resources put into his escape would be wasted. Civilian clothes, credible papers, and European language skills gave escapers their best chance.

Foreign currency would be necessary.

A gate pass was hard to forge. This sample, from late 1944

On the back was a complicated color design almost impossible to replicate.

By August 1943, Tom had crossed the wire. Work on Harry and Dick was suspended and all manpower focused on getting Tom to reach the tree line in six weeks before a contingent of American POWs who had worked on the tunnels were moved to South Compound. However, the Germans began to clear the woods for yet another new compound, directly in the path of Tom. An additional fifty yards of digging would still be required to surface within the cover of the woods. The ferrets, aware that summer was traditionally prime escaping time, intensified the daily search and surveillance efforts. Sand was found in one of the gardens, a Penguin was followed back to Hut 123. A guard, probing with a metal spike, found the entrance.

Thus, in September, Tom became the 98th tunnel to be discovered in the camp and destroyed with explosive charges. Work on Harry and Dick stopped until things settled down. In January 1944, Bushell ordered digging to resume. Soon Harry became the only viable tunnel left. The new compound which blocked Tom also lay in Dick’s path. Dick became a workshop and repository for the removed soil.
In February, Commandant Lindeiner sensed that an escape was imminent and feared the consequences. He requested SS Major Erich Brunner, the RSHA special representative for the prevention of POW escapes, to visit Stalag Luft Three to inspect the anti-escape measures within the camp. The men met to discuss the issue, but Brunner made no inspection Nor did he order that the anti-tunneling microphones, recently disconnected, should be reconnected. Some historians believe it was German High Command policy to encourage the escape and then take severe counter measures.
After this meeting, Commandant, von Lindeiner, summoned senior British officers, chaplains, and doctors and asked them to end all escape attempts.
“It is not worth it, gentlemen,” he said. “The public temper outside is running very high, particularly against the Allied Air Forces, and escapers may suffer harsh consequences. The war may be over in a year or two … it is not worth taking unnecessary risks now.” Apparently, this was not conveyed in the same explicit terms as the orders, issued by Himmler, the Stufe Römisch III and the Kugel Order, but if the warning was given it was probably based on von Lindeiner’s knowledge of those special orders conveyed by Brunner..
If he did warn the senior British officers, why did they take no notice? Bushell knew he was a marked man by the Gestapo. If caught once again in civilian clothes he would be shot. Bushell accepted that. What he and the whole escape committee did not accept was the possibility of mass execution of escapees. They did not believe that the German High Command would cross that line and flout the Geneva Convention. Then there was the issue of sunk costs. A year of massive effort had been expended. Did the committee believe it would be a serious blow to prisoner morale if they abandoned the escape? This cartoon drawn by Canadian POW Ley Kenyon after 3 years of captivity reflect the urge of all flyers to escape.

The momentum could not be stopped. Digging continued around the clock.
The path of Harry, with the names of murdered prisoners remain commemorated at site of Stalag Luft Three. Viewed from above, you get a sense of how the scale of the operation. The initial flagstone marks the spot where the stove in Hut 104 concealed Harry’s entrance.

To get beyond the wire 363 feet later, Harry’s tunnelers burrowed under the Vorlager (the German administration area), under the sick bay and the isolation cells, a path the Germans would have considered unlikely and ignored.

Commandant von Lindeiner made another attempt to disrupt the planned escape. He arranged the transfer of prisoners he considered high risk to another camp, believing they were probably ring leaders or key to the planning and logistics of the intended escape. Their removal would at least cause delay. But Bushell’s identity as Big X was a securely guarded secret. He was not selected. Perhaps Von Lindeiner, knowing he was marked by the Gestapo, assumed he would not dare escape again. Or did Lindeiner not transfer Bushell – as a test?
With all resources focussed on one tunnel, there was no disruption to Harry’s forward progress. By early March, measurement of the tunnel’s length when compared to the distance from the hut to the wire indicated they had reached the compound perimeter. At a rate of six to eight feet a day, Harry would reach the tree line in 10 days. After March 14 tunnelers started digging a shaft upwards and creating a ladder up the 30 feet to the surface. They stopped when they judged there was only three feet from the surface. Any closer might risk a subsidence if sentries walked over the spot. Harry was ready on March 14th, but a blanket of snow with below zero temperature at night put the escape on hold.

Harry’s exit point was later commemorated. The site still receives many visitors each year.

But by the night of 23 March, Bushell sensed that the ferrets were closing in. He made the decision to break open the tunnel the following night, which would be moonless. The camp’s evening curfew had been recently been relaxed, allowing prisoners to move freely around the compound till a later hour. By coincidence, Uber ferret Rubberneck was away on leave. There would be no better opportunity for another month. The pre-arranged plan for the “crawl to freedom” as it was called, accelerated fast.
All of the places were determined by ballot,
The exit order was decided by giving the first 30 places to train travelers with the best chances of successful escape. The next 40 were given to those whose contributions to the process had been indispensable, and the last 30 to the next most important workers. The remaining places were determined by the escape committee, and they were those whose names had not come up in the ballot.
220 men actively involved in preparations were chosen to escape, my father among them. Bushell picked 60 to go first, based on their German language skills and previous escape experience; the serial offenders, like himself. Traveling in pairs for mutual support, wearing convincing civilian clothes, identity documents and foreign currency, they had the best chance of making it to neutral territory. Another 140, known as hard-arsers, were chosen by lot. They would travel shanks pony, to use an 18th Century Scottish term, common in WW2, referring to the muscle between the knee and the ankle, the shank. They would be hoofing it, with little money, sleeping rough each night. They had little chance of completing a “home run” but believed any disruption they caused to the Nazi war machine was worth a spell in the cooler. Then twenty more places were awarded to those who had missed out in the draw but were deemed to be most deserving. Most of the escapees were Flight Lieutenants.. A few were Squadron Leaders, like my father.
Groups of escapers were collected at various assembly points close to Hut 104, then filtered inside, evading the notice of guards in the towers or on patrol. Each escapee’s clothing and belongings were examined for any items that would betray them as POWs. Removed were Gillette razor-blades, and other products . A Polish officer, Pilot Officer Paul Tobolski caused momentary panic when he entered Hut 104 in the fake uniform of a Luftwaffe Sergeant. A big meal was been laid on to fuel the escapers for the forthcoming ordeal in hostile country blanketed in deep snow awaited them at the far end of Harry. They ate mostly in silence. . Ft. Lt. Ley Kenyon drew this sketch as he waited.

” It was as though impending doom had thrown a shadow to chill the tense excitement in the air” wrote POW Arthur James in his memoir. Prisoners shaved off their beards. They wrote to loved ones back home. Some letters hinted at a possible reunion.
Traveling as many as 220 men a distance of 350 + feet through Harry’s two foot square tunnel required careful planning to avoid log jams. Men were sent down a dozen at a time. Fat candles in the chambers and the halfway houses were refueled in case of a power failure. Officers were positioned at each changing point to co-ordinate traffic. Harry’s railway system eventually comprised three sections, and passengers had to swap trolleys twice to complete the full journey at points named after London Underground stations, Piccadilly Circus and Leicester Square.

Unfortunately, the best laid plans are always subject to Murphy’s Law. If it can go wrong, it will. And remember O’Toole’s corollary: Murphy was an optimist.

At 8.00 pm, Ft. Lt. Leslie Bull was chosen to be the leading tunneler who would open the exit shaft. But the trap door was frozen solid by the snow fall, the first of many delays that would plague the meticulously organized escape from here on. When the trap door was finally opened half an hour later, Bull peeked out from the top of the exit shaft ladder to find that the tunnel surveyors had made an error in their calculations. The tunnel had surfaced out in the open, 20 feet short of the tree line, potentially visible from a guard tower only 30 yards away. The guard could, if he chose, rotate his searchlight onto the forest at any time. It was the next in a series of compounding problems that would impede the progress of the escape. Peeking over the rim, Bull scanned his surroundings. He could see 20 feet back from the hole towards the trees was a brushwood fence erected by the ferrets to spy on the compound from the outside. Similarly it would provide a good spotter’s position with a 180 degree view of the sentry patrols along the road beside the wire. He passed the information back down the tunnel and requested 50 feet of rope, to be a signaling device between the spotter and men waiting in the exit shaft.
The news was relayed to Bushell. He had two choices. One was to go ahead, get as many out as possible till the escape is discovered. The alternative was to put just two men out that night, have them close the trap door behind them, then cover it with snow, before crawling into the woods and heading off. . Their escape could be disguised for as long as possible by causing confusion during next morning’s appel. Without evidence of a tunnel exit, the camp authorities might assume the men has somehow got out of the camp with fake identities, Assuming snowfalls continued to disguise the freshly sealed trap door, tunneling could continue till the safety of the tree line was properly reached. In this way the scale of the escape Bushell had planned might be achieved on the next moonless night in better weather. Then he realized that all the escapees’ travel documents were date stamped and time sensitive. In a month they would be be invalid. Bushell ordered the Exodus to continue.

Silence was essential. The requested 50 foot rope was the only means of communication. At 8.45 pm, Ft. Lt. Bull crawled to the brushwood fence, holding one end of the rope. The other end was tied to the ladder beside the next man waiting in line. Concealed behind the brush, Bull had a clear view of the guard tower and the intermittent patrols along the road past the wire. When he assessed that the coast was clear, he gave two tugs on the rope. Two tugs to go, one tug to stop and stay flat. Ft. Lt. Johnny Marshall followed, using the rope as his guide. Pressing himself flat against the frozen snow, Marshall crawled to join Bull at the tree line. The next man in the exit shaft took over holding the rope at his end and waited for the tug that signaled it was safe to crawl to the trees. This was the system devised; a controller in the exit shaft, a controller at the trees, communicating by rope to the men waiting anxiously in the tunnel. Once in the shelter of the forest, each man would wait for his escape partner, not always the next in line, then head through the forest, using their magnetized razor blade compasses to point them towards their planned escape route. The methodology worked. Ft. Lt. Bull supervised the first 40 POWs from the tunnel to the forest before taking his turn to escape.
Once in the shelter of the forest, each man would wait for his escape partner, then head through the forest, using their magnetized razor blade compasses to point them towards their planned escape route. Bushell and his traveling partner, French pilot LT Bernard Scheidhauer, passed through the tunnel early. As a marked man, this was Bushell’s best chance at survival.
In the tunnel, progress was slow. It was a tight squeeze for the escapees in bulky winter clothing being hauled on a trolley through the dimly lit tunnel holding their suitcases out in front of them. Inevitably a suitcase hit a shoring board and caused a cave in that nearly buried the escapee. He was saved, but it took half an hour to shore up the damage, and free the railway track. 15 minutes later it happened again further up the tunnel. Instructions were constantly being shouted back and forth between stations as each new obstacle was reported. The dispatcher, waiting at the tunnel exit point had no more idea what was wrong than did the long queue of impatient and nerve wracked men. Sometimes a patrolling sentry would pause for a cigarette, taking longer to clear before the next man could be signaled out. One escapee was getting out every five or six minutes , half the rate anticipated.
The extra time involved in opening the exit, and subsequent hitches resulted in some train travelers missing their connection. Others crowded onto the same train increasing the risk of exposure. At Sagan railway station, Hannelore Zöller, one of the German mail censors, was passing through the booking hall of Sagan railway stationwith a friend after seeing a film in town. She noticed “two or three little groups of strange-looking men” waiting for a train. Knowing that POWs in Stalag Luft III made clothes for their variety shows, she reported her suspicions that the men might be escapees to the station policeman, describing them as “extraordinarily dressed” and looked “somewhat nervous”.. The policeman approached Sq. Ld. Tom Kirby-Green and Gordon Kidder – and asks for their identity papers, Their clothes were probably modified British uniforms, dyed and altered with different buttons. In very few cases were escapees dressed in genuine civilian clothes. Kirby-Green and Kidder produce travel passes as ‘Fremdarbeiter’, foreign laborers. The forgeries passed inspection. Hannelore Zöller and her friend continued to the camp. They asked the gate guard whether anything had been an escape. “No, everything is quiet” he reportedly said.
It was midnight when the air raid sirens began to drone,. Allied aircraft carried out a major raid on Berlin. Strong winds from the north swept the bombers towards towns and villages not normally affected by a Berlin raid. The resulting air alerts caused chaos across the German rail network and widespread blackouts. Stalag Luft Three went dark. The tunnel, dependent on stolen wattage, went pitch black. It took a while for matches to be passed along and the fat lamps relit at necessary points. When the explosions started, the man acting as controller at the brush pile ran off into the forest. The next escaper crawled out and took his place. So great was the explosive force unleashed over 100 miles away, POWs recalled they felt their huts rattle. Consider the stress felt by those inside the 2 foot square tunnel, as the distant impacts caused sand to trickle down in the darkness.
The blackout stalled progress for half an hour, with an increasing backlog building and a sense of desperation rising. Discipline largely held. Two Norwegian POWs jumped the line and forced their way into the tunnel. The Germans had doubled the patrols. It took a while before it was safe to signall the next escapee, Ft.Officer Jimmy James, who later described his thoughts on reaching the exit shaft.
” I looked up and saw stars framed in the rough outline of the exit hole twenty feet above me. At last a view of the sky outside the wire. ‘Per Ardua ad Astra’. It was hard to imagine a more appropriate context for the motto of the Royal Air Force than at that moment. There had been much toil for all concerned, but worth every moment, I thought, as I climbed silently up the ladder towards the stars.”
James recalled as he slithered the ten feet to the ferret fence across the frozen snow, every one of his movements sound to him like a pistol shot. But he made it undetected into the starry night.
Double the guards were now patrolling the wire in case POWs had used the blackout to cut a path through the wire. Somehow, as successive controllers became experience with sentry rhythms, progress accelerated At 4 am the last change of guard took place amongst the sentries patrolling the wire. Soon there were glimmerings of light light. By then more then sixty had got out. It was decided by the controlling officers in Hut 104 to make man number 87 the last one out, and dispatched the last men down the tunnel, my father among them.

My father joined those at the base of the exit ladder. He was one of the last in line. I wonder what his thoughts were at this moment; still below ground but technically at last outside the wire. But he never liked to talk about his innermost feelings,.
At 5.15 am, Ft. Lt, Shand stood close to the top of the ladder at the tunnel exit awaiting the signal to go. On watch in the woods was Ft. Lt Langlois, He saw a patrolling sentry had deviated from his beat and would tread within a few feet of the tunnel. He tugged at the signal rope, meaning “stay put.” Shand, thinking this was the opposite signal, emerged from the tunnel right by the feet of the guard. who had not seen the steam of accumulated body heat rising from the tunnel’s mouth. but began to notice tracks in the snow beyond. He then saw Ft/L Ogilvie, waiting in the woods. As the guard ran forward distracted, Shand slithered out of the hole. The guard fired a wild shot at Langlois (which missed) and blew his whistle. F/L Ogilvie ran for it and was quickly joined by Shand. The next man in the shaft Sq/L McBride was apprehended at rifle point. Unnoticed till then, hiding face down nearby, was Sq/L Len Trent, himself a holder of the VC and DSO, prior to capture. To put a stop to the gunfire, he stood up and surrendered.
When the shots were heard, someone up the ladder shouted ” Get back, the goons are here! ” My father saw the wisdom of making a speedy return to Hut 104 on all fours. No time for the trolley. Loping along behind him came Squadron Leader Clive Saxelby and Flying Officer Ken “Shag” Rees. Believing a ferret might jump down the shaft and shoot along the tunnel, Rees tried to kick out the shoring, and bring the tunnel down behind him with little success. He said “As I was haring up the tunnel, all I could see was Sax’s bum blocking the way and I expected a bayonet or a bullet up my arse at any moment!”
Commandant Lindeiner, having been woken by the air raid and was woken once again to news that four prisoners had been caught beyond the wire at a mouth of a deep tunnel. He was furious that the escape committee had not listened to his advice.
To find the source of the tunnel, Lindeiner entered the camp at the head of 75 men carrying submachine guns , forcing POWs out of their huts., shouting “Raus! Raus!”. the words of German my father said POWs heard most often.  Across the camp, maps and fake documents were being stuffed into wood stoves, or set on fire with matches to conceal the methodology involved in their creation. It was barely organized chaos to destroy incriminating evidence that would earn any POW a spell in the cooler.

Men began throwing their escape equipment out of the windows into the snow. Some tried to eat their entire supply of emergency rations and made themselves ill.
Lindeiner ordered all prisoners out of their hats for a roll-call with photographic verification. They had to strip to their underwear so their clothing could be searched for escape materials. Lindeiner raged at the assembled prisoners, reportedly saying “ So , you do not want to stay in this camp? You wish to be out, so the Gestapo will get you. They will shoot – get rid of the lot of you”.
Assembled at gunpoint, some POWs reported they were unsure if they were about to be shot.
There was a post-escape cover up plan in place to delay identification of the escapees for as long as possible. The prisoners were required to form a line in front of a trestle table with boxes of pink index cards. Each prisoner was ordered to give his name. Then it was checked against the relevant index card, which indicated the prisoner’s hut and room number. Prisoners exchanged places and gave wrong names or room number. An extremely tense period followed, according to POW accounts. But the guards’ frustration did not boil over. To what extent my father participated in these shenanigans, he never said.
After repeated head counts Lindeiner received the news that at that 73 prisoners of war in his charge were missing. Apparently he walked out of the compound ashen faced. The escape would end his career and put his life in danger.
Once the guards had searched all the huts, they pleaded with Sq.Ld. Bill Jennens to reveal the tunnel’s entrance. The dog the ferrets brought to scour under the huts had fallen asleep on a pile of prisoners blankets tossed out of the hut. The guards explained their chief ferret, Unteroffizier Charlie Pilz was missing. He had climbed down the exit ladder. Trying to navigate the tunnel in his greatcoat, he had become trapped in its depth. Guards standing beside the hole reported his cries for help. The tunnel had served its purpose. Jennens gave up the location, The stove concealing the entrance was removed. Unteroffizier Pilz was grateful for his release and actually complimented the tunnelers on their workmanship. The four men who were captured outside the tunnel were immediately sent to the cooler. All POWs were then locked in their huts.
Later that day, the Gestapo summarily took over the camp and Lindeiner was relieved of his command. He was subsequently court-martialed for gross incompetence, but managed to escape with only a token sentence. The Gestapo were enthusiastic record keepers and photographed each aspect of the escape, seen here inspecting the entrance to Tom.

The Germans filled it with sewage and sand then sealed it with cement.

Here champion ferret Rubberneck is bringing out the actual trolley used by POWs to propel themselves along the tunnel.

Another guard displays the rope used to signal the next escaper to leave the tunnel.

Rubberneck demonstrates the home made ventilation system.

The German authorities were “apoplectic” on learning the scope of the Great Escape.. 2,279 knives, forks and spoons were used for digging. 90 complete bunk beds had disappeared, along with 635 mattresses. 52 twenty-man tables, 4,000 bed boards and an endless list of other objects. For the rest of the war, each bed was issued with only nine boards, and those were counted, regularly.
The prisoners were gradually restored to normal routine, though the slightest infraction sent offenders to the cooler. Over the next twelve days, the camp was consumed with speculation on the outcome of the escape. They did not know that most of the escapees were caught within three days. Snow and cold made the going hard. Many had become lost on the way to Sagan Station. Roger “Big X” Bushell and his partner Bernard Scheidhauer, among the first few to leave the tunnel, successfully boarded a train at Sagan but were caught the next day in Saarbruken, waiting for a train to Alsace.
THE AFTERMATH

A Grossfahndung (nationwide alert) was declared. Of the eighty-seven men who had braved the tunnel that night, four were recaptured immediately outside the compound, and another seven, including my father, had retreated back into Hut 104. They would receive time in the cooler for breaking curfew.
Lindeiner’s replacement once the Luftwaffe resumed control pod the camp was Oberst (Colonel) Braune. On the morning of 6 April, he summoned Group Captain Massey, the senior British officer. Through an interpreter, Colonel Braune conveyed the somber news that forty-seven of those involved in the break-out had been “shot while trying to escape.” Massey was shocked. He repeatedly pressed Braune on how many of the escapees had only been wounded, Braune’s answer each time was : “None. and I am not permitted to give you any further information, except that their bodies and personal effects will be returned to you,” A few days later, three more names were added to the roll call of the dead.
Senior officers from all Blocks in Stalag Luft Three were assembled at the camp theater and addressed by Braune’s Adjutant, Hauptman Pieber. “You must not think the Luftwaffe had anything to do with this … we do not wish to be associated … it is terrible.”
Pieber was unaware as he stood on the theater stage that beneath it. prisoners had been concealing a large quantity of sand from the tunnels. The assembled officers were fully aware that a similar amount of sand lay underneath the tiered back rows on which they sat. It was an irony that amused POWs when German officers attended theatrical performances. There was no pleasure in it now.
The escape committee had accepted the possibility of one or two casualties if guards saw prisoners fleeing and shot at them. This was an acceptable risk . POWs were under orders to do nothing provocative, to surrender quietly if discovered. No one believed the German High Command would disregard the Geneva Convention regarding the punishment of escaped prisoners. A period of solitary confinement was ruled acceptable. Those like Roger Bushell with the strongest sense of moral outrage were prepared if necessary to make the ultimate sacrifice. Capture prevented Bushell and escape partner Scheidhauer, a Free French member of the RAF, from joining the resistance movement known as the Maquis. Bushell was in fact committed to strike back at “the hun” till it killed him.
In the wider camp, many prisoners believed the reports to be false, manufactured by the Germans to deter any further escape attempts. The authorities did lend credence to that belief, such as shipping out the possessions of the fifty men, giving the impression that they were being held elsewhere. When three more names were added to the roll call of the dead, the tragic reality sank in. The aftermath was a grim time. Gestapo investigators regularly rifled through prisoners belonging. Everywhere prisoners and guards alike were on edge. Pieber even told the PoWs to “be very careful, you are in great danger; no more tricks.”
The sudden loss of so many friends with whom my father had bonded in a common cause had an underlying effect. The trauma made him emotionally guarded for the rest of his life.

The Punishment.
To understand what motivated the men who risked their lives in that gesture of defiance known as The Great Escape, you have to examine the ideology of the regime responsible their murder, and the deaths of millions. Three principal architects of Nazism, were Hitler ( right) Himmler (center) and Goering (center left), seen here seen here in 1934 after they had seized power, had a specific involvement in this particular war crime.

They had a lot less to smile about by 1944. Standing beside Goering with Hitler and Himmler is Field Marshall Keitel, thr highest ranking officer in the German Army. They were all together at the Wolf’s Lair, Hitler’s fortified HQ away from Berlin. when on the 25th April news came of the mass escape from Stalag Luft Three.

Hitler was furious and ordered every recaptured officer to be shot. Göering pointed out that a massacre might bring about reprisals against German pilots in Allied hands. Hitler agreed, but insisted “more than half” must die. Himmler and Keitel settled on 50, to be handed over to the Gestapo and shot, ostensibly while trying to escape. Keitel ordered their bodies to be cremated and their ashes sent back to Stalag Luft Three. Himmler gave the task of selecting the fifty escaped POWs to a key subordinate and dedicated Nazi SS-Gruppenführer Arthur Nebe.

SS-Gruppenführer Arthur Nebe, a WW1 Iron Cross winner, had excellent Nazi credentials. After Gemany’s defeat, he joined Berlin’s detective bureau, the Kriminalpolizei, or Kripo. He joined the Nazi Party in 1931 and had a meteoric rise. By 1936 he had been awarded the overall command of Kripo, which became subordinate to the Gestapo. He was now mixing in the highest circles of the Third Reich.

At a meeting in Munich in November 1939, Nebe is seated second from the left, next to Himmler. Ever ambitious, Nebe volunteered in August 1941, to command Einsatzgruppe B, one of the main SS Death Squads. He subsequently ordered and sometimes supervised the executions of partizans, Jews, and itinerant Roma people, estimated at 40,000.
Nebe pioneered the infamous Black Van mobile euthanasia chamber, utilizing carbon-monoxide from the vehicle’s exhaust to kill mentally ill children in Poland, part of the Reich’s program to rid Europe of ” useless eaters.”. Here he was photographed inspecting one of the first converted vans.

Arthur Nebe – Inventor of the infamous Black Van mobile euthanasia units.
The Nazis coined the term “Mercy Killing” to describe the involuntary euthanizing of the sick, elderly and disabled. This propaganda poster from the 1930’s gives the high cost of caring for such people as a fundamental justification.

” 60,000 Reichsmarks is what this person suffering from an hereditary defect costs the People’s community during his lifetime. Fellow citizen, that is your money too.”
These propaganda posters further point to transactionalism at the heart of Nazi ideology. Here, amplified by a racist trope.
From a Nazi propaganda film strip shown to Hitler youth, the caption says: “Mentally ill Negro (English) 16 years in an institution costing 35,000 RM Reichsmarks. In addition to racism, the emotional pulling power of religion has always been manipulated by authoritarian regimes. (See contemporary politics) God’s Will has always been a useful emotional manipulation. Here it was applied to euthanasia and forced sterilization.

The caption reads: “…because God cannot want the sick and ailing to reproduce.” It was a philosophy SS-Gruppenführer Nebe embraced.On the night of March 28th, Nebe received directly from Hitler the command known as the Sagan Order. He was to select 50 of the 70 recaptured prisoners to be executed. Nebe divided the records of the captured airmen into two piles. A witness, Dr. Hans Mertens provided details of Nebe’s selection process. Those to be shot were marked with a red cross and placed in one pile, those to be spared placed in the other. This took considerable time as Nebe deliberated over who should be in either pile. In a subsequent interview, Dr. Mertens described Nebe’s demeanor as he alternated between a veneer of compassion and relish at his power,

“I attributed Nebe’s excited and uncontrolled behaviour to the fact that he was aware of the monstrosity of the deed which he was about to carry out. There may have been six or eight perhaps even ten cards which I gave him. He threw several in front of me saying: ‘Have a look whether they have wives and children.’ After putting the cards which he had kept into two piles, he took my cards. I gave him briefly the personal particulars of these particular officers. I cannot remember the names of any. I remember however, that Nebe said in one case, ‘He’s for it.’ He put this card in one pile in front of him and looking at the picture of another officer said, ‘He’s so young, no.’ This card was put into another pile. On viewing another card he said, ‘Children, no’ and put it on the first stack.”The cards of the condemned were then marked with a red X.
The execution list was relayed by confidential teleprinter to the various local Gestapo headquarters responsible for the captured POWs. After being interrogated, prisoners were told they would be returned to their prison camp. They were driven away, usually two at a time. Their Gestapo escorts would stop along a country road and invite the officers to relieve themselves. The prisoners were then shot at close range from behind. The bodies were left for retrieval, after which they were cremated and returned to Stalag Luft Three. The RAF conducted their own two year forensic investigation of all 50 murders after the war. Kirby- Green and Kidder, passing for French workers, had narrowly evaded discovery at Sagan railway station, but their luck did not hold. Nor did it for Ft.Lt. Bull, who stayed as lookout to help 40 men leave the tunnel before taking his turn. Sadly the fake Luftwaffe Sergeant uniform worn by the daring Pilot Officer Tobolsky ensured his execution.The Gestapo groups submitted almost identical reports: “the prisoners whilst relieving themselves, bolted for freedom and were shot whilst trying to escape.”Those like Roger Bushell with the strongest sense of moral outrage were prepared if necessary to make the ultimate sacrifice. Capture prevented Bushell and escape partner Scheidhauer, a Free French member of the RAF, from joining the resistance movement known as the Maquis. Bushell was committed to strike back at “the hun” till it killed him. As the car stopped at the side of a road near what is now USAF Ramstein, Bushell surely must have anticipated his fate. In the moments before he and Scheidhauer were shot, I wonder what must have been going through his mind. His year long plan to disrupt the German war machine had been foiled within days. Men who followed his leadership were going to die. Their lives must have weighed on his conscience. But given what is known about Roger Bushell, I doubt if he had real regrets. He had made his choice long ago. In those seconds between life and death, I hope he had a sixth sense that this latest atrocity, when uncovered, would help focus world attention on the true nature of the Nazi regime.
Ultimately, of the 72 Gestapo men were identified as responsible, including Gestapo Chief of Moravia Hans Ziegler. He arranged the killing of Kirby-Green and Kidder. While awaiting execution, Ziegler committed suicide in the London Cage at Cockfosters in February 1948.

21 of the accused were executed, 17 were imprisoned, 11 committed suicide, seven were untraced of whom four were presumed dead, six were killed in wartime, five were arrested but for political reasons the charge was not brought to trial. Probably the Allies valued their potential contribution to post war German reconstruction more than conviction for their crimes.

Einsatzgruppe B Death Squad SS-Gruppenführer Nebe, the selector of the condemned, met an ironic fate. Believing Germany would lose the war and his crimes would catch up with him, Nebe became involved in the failed plot to kill Hitler, known as Operation Valkyrie. He fled, adopting a variety of disguises. But a tip-off from a scorned mistress ensured his arrest. In accordance with Hitler’s orders that the plotters should be “hanged like cattle,” he met his death by means of a piano-wire and meat hook, a method he had probably witnessed.
Nebe was a prime example of the ideology the 50 murdered men had been fighting against. Those like Roger Bushell with the strongest sense of moral outrage were prepared if necessary to make the ultimate sacrifice.
As the car stopped at the side of a road near what is now USAF Ramstein, Bushell surely must have anticipated his fate. In the moments before he and Scheidhauer were shot, I wonder what must have been going through his mind. His year long plan to disrupt the German war machine had been foiled within days. Men who followed his leadership were going to die. Their lives must have weighed on his conscience. But given what is known about Roger Bushell, I doubt if he had real regrets. He had made his choice long ago. In those seconds between life and death, I hope he had a sixth sense that this latest atrocity, when uncovered, would help focus world attention on the true nature of the Nazi regime.
This is a facsimile of the official accounting list provided by the Senior British Officer in the North Compound.

As Flt. Lt. S. E. Douse, listed as still missing, was captured on April 6th, the document must date within 2 weeks of the escape. It was only after the urns containing the actual remains of the fifty men arrived at the camp two weeks later that all lingering doubts were dispelled.
Three escapers succeeded in reaching safety. Per Bergsland, anglicized as Rocky Rockland, as he had feared how the Nazis would treat a Norwegian who joined the RAF, along with Squadron Leader Jens Muller made it to neutral Sweden. Van Der Stock arrived in Gibraltar after an epic journey through Holland, Belgium, France and Spain.
Later the Luftwaffe quietly allowed the prisoners to build a memorial in the local cemetery.
It was designed by POW Wilton Todd ( shot down 15/16-Feb-44): Two of the stonemasons who carved the names were Dickie Head (shot down 24/25-Nov-43) and John Hartnell-Beavis ( shot down 25/26-Jul-1943 ) a former architect.

Urns containing ashes of the Fifty were originally buried there, but after the war were taken to the Old Garrison Cemetery at Poznan. Both monuments still remain today, but there were very few traces of the camp left when RAF veterans and POW survivors visited it 50 years later, though there was a local museum of camp exhibits. Paul Tobolski, son of Pilot Officer Tobolsky, who had the hutzpah to create a Luftwaffe uniform as his disguise, visited the memorial. He corrected a small error on his father’s initials, and liberated one of the tiles from Harry’s entrance. He had never known his father.

My mother knew nothing of the escape. All my father’s letters, unlike some potentially last letters written the night of the escape, made no mention of anything other than he was doing well under prison camp circumstances.
“I wrote to Eric frequently and got worried when his letters were held up, fearing that he had escaped, and was on the run, or had been shot while attempting to escape.”
Her diary reflects a constant fear felt by the families of the 170,000 British prisoners of war. My father’s letters had naturally given no indication that he was involved in escape attempts. They would have attempted to reassure her that he was safe, and well treated, trying to minimize his wife’s anxiety for the rest of the war. But war inflicts lasting psychological damage on all it touches. My mother would suffer from bouts of anxiety and depression for the rest of her life. I wish I could have read what they wrote to each other, but sadly my parent’s wartime correspondence was lost. My mother told me that she would send news of family and friends, with reassuring messages about how she was coping, how Britain was resilient.

Recycling was embraced as much on the Home Front as it was in Stalag Luft Three. Nothing should be wasted.

One of my mother’s letters would have told of the loss of her step brother Peter Medwin, from Fred Medwin’s first marriage. The divorce had alienated both his children, but he and his son had just become reconciled, before a senseless wartime accident. “The blackout.”  was introduced on 1 September 1939, two days before war was actually declared. 1,130 road deaths were recorded. as opposed to 544 in the same month the previous year. It remained in force for five years until September 1944, when regulations were relaxed to allow a ‘dim-out’.

By January 1942, one in five people had some form of injury as a direct result of the blackout. Late one night Peter  Medwin got onto the wrong bus to return to the RAF base where he was stationed. Driven without lights due to blackout regulations, the bus crashed into a parked lorry. The occupants were incinerated. Fred Medwin never got over the loss of his only son. It was some comfort to him that when I was born, my parents chose Medwin as my middle name.

Writing letters to keep my father’s spirits up, my mother probably wrote little of rationing to a hungry man. She was allowed to send a 10 pound Red Cross food parcel to him every three months. Chocolate was a favorite item. Rationing kept chocolate in short supply but she generally able to include it. Among its obvious merits, chocolate was a useful in bribing guards.
My mother was lucky to be living with her parents. Her culinary training meant she she could make something tasty out of anything. Rationing was difficult for everybody in England. But they adapted.

Every citizen was issued with a booklet, to obtain supplies from a registered shopkeeper, who would stamp it accordingly.

At first, only bacon, butter, and sugar were rationed. But gradually, the list grew: the meat was rationed from 11 March 1940; cooking fats in July 1940, tea , jam and cheese were rationed by May 1941.

.Allowances fluctuated throughout the war, but on average one adult’s weekly ration was 113g bacon and ham (about 4 thin slices), one shilling and ten pence worth of meat (about 227g minced beef), 57g butter, 57g cheese, 113g margarine, 113g cooking fat, 3 pints of milk, 227g sugar, 57g tea, and 1 egg.
Canned meat, fish, rice, condensed milk, breakfast cereals, biscuits and vegetables were available but in limited quantities on a points system.
Fresh vegetables and fruit were not rationed but supplies were limited. Many people responded to the government’s campaign, and grew their own vegetables.
.

Some types of imported fruit all but disappeared. Lemons and bananas became unobtainable for most of the war; oranges continued to be sold but greengrocers customarily reserved them for children and pregnant women, who could prove their status by producing their distinctively marked ration books.

Bread was not rationed until after the war ended, but the “national loaf” of wholemeal bread was replaced by the ordinary white variety, mushy, grey, and initially blamed for digestion problems. Ironically, over the years the national diet improved. Before the war Britain imported 75% of its food. By 1945, 75% of British food was home grown.
My mother’s last year of school included culinary training from a Cordon Blue chef. I can attest she could make something tasty out of anything.

Inevitably there were ways of getting round regulations. Those that were caught were fined or jailed if they stole ration books.

However, there was a significant underground market in food for people with money. “Luxury” off-ration foodstuffs were being unfairly obtained by those who could afford to eat regularly in restaurants. In May 1942, an order was passed that meals served in hotels and restaurants must not cost over 5 shillings per customer, must not be of more than three courses, and at most only one course could contain meat, fish, or poultry. Today it’s hard to imagine this level of state regulation being accepted for the common good. But in wartime Britain, in my mother’s words, ” you just got on with it.”
My mother began hearing of the escape from cryptic messages in POW letters to other POW wives. The scale of the escape was “big”. References to casualties began to percolate. My mother was naturally frantic till a letter from my father confirmed he was alive.. Since his capture, her world was based upon the conviction that Eric would return home safe.
The British government had learned of 47 of the deaths after a routine visit to the camp by the Swiss authorities in May. Switzerland, as a neutral country, regularly reported on conditions in prison camps at the request of both sides in the conflict. British Military Intelligence contacted contacted sources within Germany to obtain more information.

This is how the British public first learned the news of the reprisal. when on June 23rd Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden addressed Parliament, promising that those responsible would be brought to “exemplary justice.”

****

At a Stalag Luft Three, shock and anger within the British and American compounds settled into grief and bitter acceptance for all those that knew the murdered men. Interest in escape had been chilled. There was inevitably retrospective debate on the wisdom of the mass breakout after the previous commandant’s warning. There were those that felt that Bushell’s determination to ” make life hell for the hun” had caused the death of men who might have survived the war, but to speak of it felt like dishonoring the sacrifice. How my father felt about these issues I cannot say. I know he had a strong sense of duty to his country all his life. He was glad he “had a go”, twice, and glad he survived. Survival was now the priority as the promised invasion of Europe seemed imminent. For my father in prison camp and it meant a dogged continuation of the waiting game. For my mother my mother on the Home Front, it was a slow moving emotional rollercoaster, as she put it, “a constant seesaw of hopes raised, dashed and raised again.”
Over the next eleven months both my parents would have their spirits raised or dampened by news of the progress of the war. My mother like every one in England got daily updates from newspapers and BBC Radio. The illicit radio in Stalag Luft Three fed limited information into the camp, supported by up to date accounts from RAF and USAF Bomber Command POWs who were arriving in increasing numbers.
The next pivotal event began in the early hours of June 6th, D-Day, Operation Overlord, the first step in the planned liberation of Europe.

German reaction to the landings was slow and confused. The spell of bad weather which had made the decision to go so fraught for Allied commander Eisenhower also meant the Germans were caught off guard. Rommel was visiting his wife in Germany and many senior commanders were not at their posts. In addition, the Allied deception plan, Operation ‘Fortitude’, had convinced Hitler that Normandy would be a feint; the real invasion target was Calais. Military logic supported this view. British Intelligence reinforced it with deception strategies. Hitler was sufficiently convinced that Normandy was a feint, he delayed moving the 15th Army from Pas De Calais to Normandy till July. The only operational unit. 21st Panzer within striking distance of the beaches did not advance till mid afternoon on D-Day, allowing enough time for Allied forces to secure the Normandy beachhead.
The next day the German public would read these headlines. The invasion had been expected, and touted as opportunity for Germany to inflict a stinging defeat on the Allies. Propaganda insisted the invasion force would soon be thrown back into the sea. In fact by now most Germans realized Nazi victory against the combined might of Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and America was an illusion . The German people’s focus was now on survival. Their hope was that Hitler’s much vaunted terror weapons would cause the Allies to negotiate acceptable peace terms.

Probably copies of German newspapers made their way into POW camps across Germany, The news raised morale in Stalag Luft Three. Home by Christmas seemed a possibility. It became my mother’s dream as the invasion spearhead penetrated deeper into France.

Hitler retaliated with vengeance weaponry – Vergeltungswaffen. Though Wunderwaffe, (wonder weapon) was term Nazi propaganda preferred. This was the V1, the Flying Bomb. Because aeronautical innovation is a strand of this memoir, I will briefly digress about the jet powered prototype for today’s Cruise missile. And the flying bombs of all kinds that fall on Ukraine every day.

The V1 was mass produced in underground factories with slave labor. In all some 60,000 people were deported to be the labor force. Possibly 12,000 died as a result of the brutal conditions.

Hitler intended ” pilotless planes” to renew the Blitz on London without loss of Luftwaffe aircrew. In 1943, multiple villages on the French and Dutch coasts were selected as launch sites.

RAF surveillance revealed the development of these sites in January 1944. Probably this sketch was shown to Churchill.

British Military Intelligence, MI-6 in particular, sifted through surveillance of the new Nazi weapons program. It confirmed information from their sources in Berlin: Hitler believed the Pas-de-Calais region, at 21 miles the closest landfall to the British coast, rather than Normandy, a six hour voyage, was the principal target of the Allied invasion. His V-1 rockets fired from that area would then rain down on the fleet as it approached. MI-6 offered Churchill Operation “Fortitude” to deflect attention from Normandy and reinforce Calais as the true target, Britain set up camps containing a “ghost army” in empty tents with dummy aircraft and tanks across the South East coastal region to be recorded by the Luftwaffe surveillance flights. An armada of decoy landing crafts, made of of painted canvases pulled over steel frames, were created around the mouth of the River Thames. Inflatable Sherman tanks were shifted to different locations under the cover of night. Rollers were used to simulate tank tracks left behind in their wake.

Another ruse in Operation Fortitude, was to employ 2nd. Lieutenant Clifton James, an Australian actor enlisted in the Army Pay Corps who was observed impersonating Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery in a Drama and Variety Group revue sketch. Far from a reprimand, James was promoted to 1st Lt. and immediately assigned to Montgomery’s staff to learn his speech and mannerisms. ( by Lt Colonel David Niven, no less, who left Hollywood to join Military Intelligence) James had lost a middle finger in the Battle of the Somme, so a prosthetic finger was installed. Details matter in spycraft. Matching Montgomery’s abstinence from tobacco and alcohol was less successful. After a crash course, on May 26th, Lt. James, playing Montgomery, was flown on Churchill’s private plane to British bases in Algiers, Cairo and Gibraltar to catch the attention of local spies. German Intelligence would surmise that no attack across the English Channel could be imminent with the prominent Allied general apparently scouting the Mediterranean. Luckily German Intelligence were unaware of a drunken wander “General Montgomery” took through the Gibraltar streets before officers spirited him out of sight. This is the actual Lt. James after recruitment into Project Fortitude.

His story would one day be filmed as ” I Was Monty’s Double”, playing the leading role. James was a pretty good match.

In the weeks leading up D-Day, the deception continued. The Allies stepped up their aerial attacks on Pas de Calais to simulate a prelude to invasion. Then as D-Day began. Allied aircraft flying toward Pas de Calais dropped clouds of aluminum strips. These caused false radar readings in Calais indicating that a large fleet was approaching. The RAF dropped hundreds of dummy paratroopers, wired to simulate the sounds of rifle fire and grenades when they hit the ground. British commandos also parachuted in, amid the dummies, and operated “phonographs” to broadcast the sounds of soldiers’ voices. British Military Intelligence were more effective at using deception and decoys than their Nazi counterparts. Future James Bond author Ian Fleming was part of the Special Operations Executive. The spy gadgetry of Bond had its origin in his department.
I have segued from aeronautical innovation to spy craft, revealing a tangential fascination of mine. Also, when reflecting on an era, one digression tends to lead to another. But there is a connection between them. MI-6 provided deception countermeasures against both the V-1 and V-2 which took time. The V 1 was launched through a combination of its jet engine and a catapult ramp. The Imperial War Museum built this replica.

The V1, could fly up to 160 miles, falling from the sky when its fuel supply ran out, detonating 1800 pounds of TNT on impact. The amount of fuel loaded was calculated by the distance between the launch site and London or South East coastal cities. The attacks began on June 13th

The first V-1 hit Clapham in South London on June 13th, causing casualties and dismay that the air defense system could be evaded. Mi-6 sent disinformation about V-1 falling short of London back through its double agents, causing some rockets to overshoot populated areas. At peak, more than one hundred V-1 a day were fired at Southeast England, 9,521 in total, before the launch sites were over run by Allied troops. The V-1 attacks killed 6,184 people and injured at least another 18,000. By comparison, in the eight months of the 1940 Blitz on London, 43,000 civilians were killed.
The V-1’s pulse jet engine made a buzzing sound, giving rise to the terms buzz bombs or doodlebugs. My mother recalled that ominous moment of silence.
“I can still recall the noise the doodlebugs made. If the engine cut out above you on a cloudy day, you would pray that it will not come straight down, but drift on for a few minutes; you only knew for sure when you heard the crash or explosion, and you breathed again.”
No doubt RAF POWs heard about the doodlebugs in mail from their wives. Pilots, my father among them, would have debated how to combat a low altitude pilotless plane that cruised faster than most British fighters. As Chief Flying Instructor in 1940 at Central Flying School, my father would have been familiar with the capabilities of all the latest fighters, and would have given refresher courses to many of the pilots that were now his fellow POWs. BBC broadcasts on the camp’s illicit radio would have provided more details. A major topic among Stalag Luft Three flyers that July would have been doodlebugs: how to destroy them in the air, minimizing damage, and do so from a sufficient distance, to avoid being damaged by the blast of the explosion.
The RAF were quick to respond and adapt. Spitfires and Hurricanes were too slow to catch a V-1, which could average 340 mph, unless they had a height advantage, allowing them to gain speed by diving on their target. The only aircraft with the low-altitude speed to be effective against the V-1 was the Hawker Tempest.

These 1944 pictures show the size of the engine and the 12 foot 9 inch diameter propeller that enabled the Tempest to reach a top speed of 442 miles per hour. A post-D-Day New Zealand Squadron celebrates their Tempest.

Closely guided by coastal radar installations, the Tempests located incoming targets and destroy them with 20mm cannon fire. Although only 30 Tempests were available at the onset of the attacks, the Hawker Tempest squadrons accounted for 638 of 1,846 RAF kills of the flying bombs.
Spitfire pilots with aerobatic ability tried Wing Tipping. Here is an enlargement from an actual photograph of a Spitfire in the attempt.

This involved harnessing the airflow that runs over a plane’s wing. The intercepting pilot would dive down, reaching the same speed as the buzz bomb, then manoeuver to fly directly alongside. The pilot slowly slid his wing tip a few feet under the V-! wing. He then carefully adjusted height to bring the airflow running over his wing to within 6 inches of the lower surface of the V-1’s wing. Correctly executed, this manoeuvre tipped the V-1’s wing upwards, over-riding its internal gyroscope, pitching the V-1 into an out-of-control dive. At least sixteen V-1s were destroyed this way, the first by a P-51 piloted by USAF Major R. E. Turner of 365th Fighter Squadron on 18 June.
The V-1 attacks had no effect on the advance across Normandy. Montgomery was able to break out from Caen and the race to Paris was on.

My mother would have read this announcement. POWs in Stalag Luft Three would have heard about it it within days. Anti Nazi guards often provided information.

Responding on September 8th 1944, Germany launched its new flying bomb – the V-2. The first hit the newly liberated city of Paris, the second fell on London.

When launched from a mobile pad, the V-2’s enhanced jet engine burned for up to 70 seconds, propelling the rocket to a maximum height of 50 miles. It was aimed at the dead center of London.

Four seconds after launch the V-2 tilted to an angle of 47 degrees. When the engine cut off, the rocket glided the rest of the way across the North Sea in a parabolic curve On its downward trajectory the V-2 reached supersonic speed. For its victims, there was no warning.

This V-2 struck Teniers Square in Antwerp, as a British convoy passed through, killing 126 people.

Hitler was convinced that ” wonder weapons”, including the atomic bomb his scientists had promised, would bring a swift end to the war. Luckily his scientists took the wrong research path of “heavy water”, and reached a dead end. The attacks from V-2s resulted in the deaths of an estimated 9,000 civilians and military personnel. More than 3000 V-2 rockets were fired , the last on on March 27 1945. An estimated 2,754 civilians were killed in London by V-2 attacks with another 6,523 injured, which is two people killed per V-2 rocket.
The Government, worried about potential panic gave the reasons for the damage as gas explosions. This prompted cynical Londoners to respond “Have you heard about Hitler’s latest secret weapon – the flying gas main ?”
But there was no effective air or ground defense against such an unpredictable weapon. British Intelligence learned that the V-2 had one fatal flaw. The Germans had decided not to use radio guidance to direct it to its targets, for fear the signal might be jammed. Instead, the missile was purely ballistic.
The RAF exploited this weakness, using their latest secret radar vans capable of glimpsing the trajectory of the V-2s a few seconds before they passed out of range. Working with nothing more sophisticated than their slide rules, Allied teams determined the point of the missiles impact on London. From that they would calculate the origin of the curve. If they could accomplish this within six minutes, Fighter Command would have time to relay the map co-ordinates to Spitfire pilots operating from RAF Coltishall in Norfolk, who could be over the Dutch coast within half an hour, just enough time to bomb the launch sites before the Germans withdrew.
British double agents like Eddie Chapman or ZigZag fed misinformation to the Germans suggesting that the V2s were overshooting London, causing some rockets to be mistakenly directed east of the London into the fields of Kent and Essex. The entire tonnage of high explosive delivered by the V2 over seven months, 3,000 tons, could be dropped in a single raid by British heavy bombers. The V2 was expensive, resource intensive and had little strategic value. Few weapons better exemplify Hitler’s fixation with the wonder weapon, a magic bullet for a war he had already lost.
My mother had no personal experience of the V-2, because most rockets overshot the part of South England where she was living. The progress Allied forces were making helped a sense of optimism. To end the war by Christmas was within reach if a bold move proposed by Montgomery was successful: a straight push over the lower Rhine rivers. US Airborne troops were dropped to secure the three bridges ahead of the British line of advance. Operation Market Garden was a hastily developed plan. Success depended on Murphy’s Law being absent without leave. .
Its objective was to create a 64 mile salient into German territory.
Murphy’s law. Optimistic planning, weather, missed opportunities. Intelligence failure .Spy.
Bridge too far.

Murphy’s law. Optimistic planning, weather, missed opportunities. Intelligence failure .Spy.

41,000 dropped in by parachute or glider to capture nine bridges ahead of the Army advance .100,000 seasoned German troops were in the area.

It was the largest airborne operation of the war up to that point.

Armored brigades captured two Dutch cities and overran a few V-2 launching sites. It failed in its most important objective: securing the bridge over the Rhine at Arnhem. after suffering 8,000 dead, missing, and captured out of a complement of 12,000 men. Prisoners Arnhem would soon start arriving at Stalag Luft Three.

It was a setback for all those hoping the war would end by Christmas.
The British public were told little about the errors.
In December Hitler launched his counter attack known as Battle of the Bulge.

Worries about Hitler ordering POWs to be shot.

This poster was released in summer 1940. German morale reports found that it was effective. The text translates as: “Smash the Enemies of Greater Germany!” A literal translation would be: “Into Dust with All Enemies of Greater Germany.”

As war intensified in North Africa, the Atlantic, and in the skies over Britain throughout 1940, the security of sensitive information became one of the government’s many public education campaigns. This one targeted the danger to naval convoys and RAF missions in public places where enemy agents or sympathizers could be listening.

British propaganda art used simple cause and effect messages, citing Pub talk and gossiping women as the chief offenders.When speaking to the “Tommies”, the average British soldier, the upper middle class government used working class slang. Social attitudes embedded in propaganda are interesting to deconstruct.

German propaganda, under Goebbels, used more sophisticated graphic arts techniques. I admire the way the clandestine enemy is reflected.

Interesting use of light and shadow ; the outstretched cup representing a microphone. The curvature of the listening waiters body, , the proffered cup and saucer metaphorically acting as a microphone. I tend to view such images with a dramatist’s eye. Less subtlety by 1943 in this poster advocating silence

The caption: “Shame on you, chatterer! The enemy is listening. Silence is your duty.” Somehow I imagine a yappy Daffy Duck in Leibenhosen.
Blackout issues.

Conserving resources now had a new goal.

When Nazi forces attacked Russia, they capitalized on anti Russian resentment in Ukraine, which Stalin had brutalized andstarved in the previous decade.With advertising like this they attempted to recruit Ukrainian brigades to fight their former oppressor.

Much has been written about the hidden persuaders in Nazi propaganda. The US Holocaust Museum has some compelling material.

Before World War II began, Germans were allowed to listen to foreign radio broadcasts. This was banned once the war began, and by the end of the war people were executed for listing to enemy radio stations. In this poster, a Marxist-looking chap broadcasts from London, Moscow, and other enemy states, while a German listens in the darkness, trying to conceal his crime.

German Blackout poster.

This poster was distributed in occupied Europe and satellite countries from 1942 onwards. It was part of the Nazi attempt to persuade occupied Europe that it was part of a common European crusade against Bolshevism.

In some ways things were looking up This British cartoon mocks…. Ribnentrop. British Intelligence had informed the government of a brief affair with Wallis Simpson. Would she have seen a copy of the Punch cartoon in Jamaica?

.

A 1937 anti-Bolshevik Nazi propaganda poster. The translated caption reads: “Bolshevism without a mask – large anti-Bolshevik exhibition of the NSDAP Gauleitung Berlin from 6 November to 19 December 1937 in the Reichstag building“.
However, this poster highlights the common nazi practice of fear mongering and exclusion that lead to their iron hold on power.
The target audience, moderate german citizens yet to convert to Nazi ideas, might find this poster compelling for several reasons. Humans are frequently selfish, usually harboring beliefs that work toward their own self interests, as such the duality between propaganda and paranoia is paramount. Propaganda is most effective in a society where fear and uncertainty germinate, but in the same way, the propaganda itself creates that atmosphere of paranoia. Should an average citizen see this poster, with its ghoulish colors and gruesome depictions, a feeling of fear or uncertainty may be evoked within him. He might think to himself that he must protect his family from the perceived threat. And what is promising to protect him from suffering the same fate as the victims in the poster? The Nazis, and Germans perceive them as “a young, energetic group pledged to rectify the situation” (Allen, 80). Fueled by the threat of other ideologies, the propaganda was usually aimed at destroying the merit of other political and societal groups. Therefore, otherwise kind people develop close minded beliefs in an act of self preservation.
The color scheme is noteworthy in the way it twists the messaging. The victims are both dressed in simple white tunics, which represent the ‘innocence’ of the corpses. Red and yellow, along with the yellow satchel tied to the attacker’s waist and the previously mentioned star hat, allude to the Soviet Union’s flag. As a result, the propaganda does not target individual bolsheviks, but an entire country. The depictions in the actual scene are offensive. The figure’s teeth are bared in a grin because of the slaughter before him, and his face is purposefully designed to resemble an ape. In this way, the poster disparages Soviet Bolsheviks, as they are being represented as less than human, beasts, and uncivilized barbarians eager to cause the destruction of civilization. The dehumanization of this group parallels the Nazi ideology of aryans, or the master race, verses nonaryans, all those inferior. Minorities and ‘undesirables’ were classified as non aryans and continually attacked in propaganda, the artist commonly employing techniques to exaggerate negative stereotypes and further alienate the target group. Such strategies were frequent in the nazi regime, and the resulting ostracization made targets feel even more separated from german society than before. The culmination of the Nazis obsession with propaganda, and the ceaseless nature at which it was produced, ultimately polarized communities and slowly radicalized citizens.
Nazi propaganda against the Soviet Union was interrupted for a period of a few years in August 1939, due to the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact (or formally the Treaty of Non-Aggression) between Germany and the Soviet Union. In order to prevent a two front war, Hitler signed the treaty a few days before the invasion of Poland in the beginning of September 1939.

This poster, which I think is from 1940, urges Germans to obey the blackout regulations. The text translates as: “The enemy sees your light! Black out!”
Anti hoarding campaign.
“Hoarder, be ashamed of yourself.” The German term for a hoarder is Hamster.

In 1942 Nazis started recruiting from occupied territories.Propaganda recruiting poster of the 27th SS Volunteer Division “Langemarck” with the title “Flemings all in the SS Langemarck!”
.

Poster below is intended for Flemish speaking Belgians, urging them to join the SS Langemarck Division. The caption in red says: “Our anwer: Pick up your arms and fight!”

In German controoled territories it was a crime to listen to foreign radio.

After the great escape, British intelligence sent to senior officers at Stella, three, that all escape attempts were to cease .But ttunneling began again. When prisoners began hearing rumors that Hitler was planning to have all prisoners of war executed if the war continued to go badly /if the Russians reached their prison camp.
On July 19. Hitler had issued an order issued instructions for preparations for evacuations of foreign labor, slave, labor, and civilians away from the advancing army in the east, one close to the preparation of moving prison of war to the rear At the Nerenberg war crimes trial SS General Gottlob burger, gave evidence that Hitler had considered a threat to execute 35,000 POW‘s, unless the allies agreed to a peace deal similar similarly SS chief Heinrich Himler had made similar plans, sent it on collecting prisoners on the Baltic coast region where he set up a new headquarters., and many wondered if they were being moved towards concentration camps to be killed in revenge for the allies, deliberate targeting of civilians in cities, such as Dresden. as a result, a new tunnel was dug named george after King George. This tunnel was not really meant for escape. It was for emergencies only. a contingency tunnel, built a mid POW‘s growing fear, that the advance of the Russian army might prompt the German captains to turn on them. The tunnel started at the rear end of the Theatre. It ran towards the section of the camp, where the guards were housed, rather than towards the wooded area between the prison camp, and the God camp Some have speculated that perhaps the prisoners were planning to break into the guard barracks to steal weapons either to fight their way out or defend themselves from a massacre should it should Hitler order it . Three was excavated in 2011 the existence of the ultra secret tunnel george was confirmed among materials recovered from it was a clandestine POW radio crafted out of a biscuit box and other materials scavenge from the camp,

 

THE LONG MARCH

At the end of January 1945, Russian forces had advanced to within 15 miles of Stalag Luft Three. Liberation seemed only days away. But on January 27th, the camp commander received orders from Berlin. Hitler had ordered the immediate evacuation of the camp. All six compounds were instructed to march that very night. You can imagine the mixed emotions of the POWs, as they  hurriedly collected  extra clothes, food rations, potential escape aids like a map and compass. My father was obliged to leave behind the secret radio he had been in charge of hiding. The US personnel in the south compound were the first to leave at 9:20 pm followed by RAF contingents at 1 am. Each man was given a Red Cross food parcel. In all, 10,000 men  marched through the gates of Stalag Luft Three throughout the night and the following morning. into subzero temperatures, a thick covering of snow, and occasional blizzards. It was one of the coldest winters in memory. The column of POWs stretched for 3 miles.

Not only were 10,000 men force-marched to new prison camps in distant areas, but a flood of German refugees fleeing the Russian advance were clogging the snow swept roads. My father was always brief when asked about his experiences in the last months of the war, which was, in essence,  ” Cold, hungry, and scared a lot of the time”, with little accompanying detail. He never mentioned the Long March, as such; just another prison camp posting that eventually took him to  Stalag 3 A  at Luckenwalde. But I get a sense of what he experienced from on-line posts of other RAF veterans of the Long March.

Flt. Lt. Geoffrey Keen wrote in his diary after they had marched for 21 miles :

“In bitter weather and blowing blizzard 700 of us were pushed in a barn, bare of straw, some of the men in very bad condition. Bitterly cold.

29.1.45 Set off again at 8.30am still blowing a blizzard, bitterly cold, passed through Preibus at 11.45am. Many falling back, some very exhausted, arrived at Muskau at 7.00pm, had continued a blizzard all day. Most of the men exhausted. Spent three days in a brick factory and part of the last day at Count Von Arnim’s riding stable. Covered another 24 kilometers.

1-2-45 Left Muskau at 10pm. Thaw had set in and roads in bad state. Had to leave sledge and carry pack on back. Marched 19 kilometers, worst march of the journey,   feeling very exhausted. Feet in quite good condition, large number of sick men. 

Several veterans made sketches.

At Spremberg railway station, the POWs were loaded into 50 cattle trucks, 40 men per wagon, with only one bucket between them for sanitary purposes. The journey took over 40 hours. Flt. Lt. Keen concludes:

“Hell of a journey. Marched 3 kilometers to the new camp in pouring rain. Stood outside gate for four hour and then searched. Thirteen of us placed in an empty room with wet straw to sleep on. Feeling pretty done in but glad to fall down and sleep anywhere. Had marched 90 kilometers and done 300 in the cattle truck. Majority sick, some in very bad state.”

According to Robert Schirmer, a  Red Cross delegate in Germany, 80% of the POWs on the northern line of march were suffering from dysentery by the time they reached their designated Stalag.. Sufferers had the indignity of soiling themselves whilst having to continue to march. At minus 13 degrees fahrenheit, it was march or die. Typhus, acquired from body lice, was a risk for all POWs. Like dysentery, it spread through overnight shelter previously occupied by infected groups. In these conditions the night held little comfort for those who had marched in wet boots.for 12 hours. Whether to remove them at night was an issue. Trench foot could result from prolonged exposure to moisture, an affliction of infantry soldiers in WW1.  If a POW removed his boots, he might not get his swollen feet back into his boots in the morning. He could get frostbite overnight. The boots could freeze or be stolen. A few sick men froze to death in their sleep. Others vanished without trace. A few were shot trying to escape.  Some succeeded in reaching advancing Allied lines.

 

As a senior officer within his section af the march, my father’s duties would have been similar to those he had as a member of the escape committee. He psychologically managed  prison camp life, by remaining an actively engaged serving officer.  On the March, I imagine he would have been involved in the daily management of shelter and food, and negotiations with German authorities. The fog of war took its toll. One marching column of POWs was mistaken for German troops by RAF Typhoons, despite clear skies and Red Cross insignia being displayed. They opened fire, causing multiple casualties. The German guards agreed to POW requests that further marching would be done by night. An estimated 2200 British and Commonwealth POWs died on the march.  The residents of some villages, bitter at continuous Allied bombing, Dresden in particular,  threw stones at the passing column. Others offered water and hot drinks.  One woman, bearing coffee, explained her empathy. Her husband was a POW in England. The Sagan March was a miserable, psychologically traumatizing experience for the POWs. But there was something about this generation of young men that kept them putting one foot in front of the other.

For my father  surviving the war was his driving force.

For two months of these conditions. POWs endured the uncertainty about whether any General would carry out Hitler’s orders to shoot 30.000 POWs.   or they will be made to march towards the Baltic sea to be used as human shield and hostages by Himler, who would hoped to inherit the right from Hitler .

On the 22 April the red army and swept through Eastern Europe through Easton in Germany   at Stalag 3 A Luckenwalde. The guards had already fled, and the POWs, including those from Stalag Luft 3 in Sagan, my father among them.   welcomed the Russian liberators camp is now under the supervision of captain, mid vid the . A convoy of 50 trucks soon arrived leading with food, clothes and medical supplies for the prisoners in Stella Grove 3 AA. The liberation process was a little slower than other camps in question owing to the diplomatic protocols involved with it now being in Russian territory and control summit became impatient, and took two hitchhiking on their own, or joining the Russian advance towards Berlin.

.

 

on May 4, 1945, RAF command implemented operation exodus and the first prison war repatriated by command 2940s over the next 23 days caring 72,500 prison of war.
The total number of US POWs in was in the region of 94,000 and official sources claimed at 1121 American prisoners of war died in German prisoner of war caps. The British Commonwealth total was close to 180,000 men, .while no accurate record exist, if a similar Casual viewers assume the number who died would be around 2200
US to pop to veteran affairs estimated that almost 3500 US and Commonwealth POW’s died as a result of the matches other estimates very greatly suggesting that 8348 Commonwealth in American POW died between September 44, and May 1945

Russian liberators.
Mother learns he is in Buchenwald.?
Returns home.

Aeronautical design . An original design.
Capture prevented Bushell and escape partner Scheidhauer, a Free French member of the RAF, from joining the resistance movement known as the Maquis. Bushell was committed to strike back at “the hun” till it killed him.

Documents revealed many years after the war an interesting co-incidence that make it clear the British war office was aware of the impending escape at eight that night at 8 PM Swiss time at 8 PM local time in Switzerland, the British minister in the Swiss foreign interest department, send a site cipher sent a coded message to the British foreign office it was important and read as follows he passed on confidential information from in German source, Dr. Carl Hart as follows.
‘ dr. Carl Burkhart has confidentially told his majesty consul it at Geneva command informed I RCC delegate in Berlin. The preparations are being made by the Air Force prisoners of war in Germany, especially members of the royal Air Force and the United States Air Force to join in any revolt that might break out in Germany, in the event of internal trouble German authorities were therefore being compelled to take special measures. “
Dr. Burkhart took this to mean that the prisoners rights and privileges under the conventions would be seriously reduced in the near future and is anxious that you should be confidentially informed. He hopes that will be no press or other publicity of any kind as this might well precipitate events.”
Did the German security services intercept this communication?

Lindeiner was subsequently court-martialed for gross incompetence, managed to escape with only a token sentence. After the war he provided the Allies with useful information about the workings of the Nazi war machine.

GRANT PAGE – End of an Era

 

Grantley John Page (1939 – 2024)

Grant Page was Australia’s pioneer stunt performer and my friend for fifty-two years. I will miss him terribly. He was an inspiring man, who lived uncompromisingly. Most people accept that age weighs upon us, gravity holds us down, death awaits us if we dare too much. Not necessarily, said Grant, as he successfully tampered with the laws of physics and probability.  The ‘have a go’ spirit, the ‘think it through, take good aim, and go for it’ quality that has distinguished Australian achievers in all fields of endeavor was clearly present in Grant. He had courage and daring, tempered by a realistic attitude about the risks of his profession in the era before computer generated stunts.

 

 

Grant and I met when I needed someone to perform a rope slide off The Gap in Sydney. As an ex-commando, he was an ideal candidate. This was before Grant was defined as a stuntman; he was doing stunts for fun and the challenge of working them out.

There was a raw masculinity about him and an understated self-confidence, not unlike Errol Flynn. I instantly saw that he had the potential for a career both on the screen and behind the camera, and became his manager for the next five years, creating vehicles for Grant that would demonstrate his expertise: Kung Fu Killers, The Man from Hong Kong, Dangerfreaks, Death Cheaters, and Stunt Rock.

 

As a stunt coordinator and second unit director, he was a charismatic team leader. All those who knew Grant had their spirits lifted by the force of his inimitable personality and “can-do” attitude to the challenges of his work. He was charming, witty and had a forceful intellect. But above all, Grant had a generous life-affirming spirit.

 

He understood the art of illusion, that a stuntman’s role was to make something look dangerous without actual risk to himself and his team. His work on George Miller’s Mad Max firmly established Grant’s international reputation for death-defying images, and showed the world that the fledgling Australian film industry could deliver Hollywood level action and mayhem.

Such eye-popping stunts were a major contribution to the development of our film industry, and got Australian genre films international respect. Grant would go on to forge a distinguished career in film, which continued to the end, including work on the latest addition to the Mad Max canon, Furiosa.  

It would be impossible to express the depth of Grant’s meaning to my life. Grant and I shared the deepest respect for our fathers, veterans of World War II, for their courage and resourcefulness, dedication. We both tried to emulate our fathers, and their examples motivated our respective careers. Grant and I were good and sometimes mischievous influences on one another. We did fire stunts, climbed cliffs and got up to other shenanigans. Here he climbs the London County Council  Building.

We respected each others’ counsel. One piece of Grant’s advice proved fateful.  The night before I first met Margaret, Grant had said, “You should get married, mate.”  The next day, photographed here, it was love at first sight, and I immediately saw the wisdom of his words.

Over the next half century, we three shared a deep personal and professional friendship. Our world will not be the same without him in it.

Vale,  Grant Page.

 

HIGH STRANGENESS

 

HIGH STRANGENESS will premiere at this year’s Melbourne Underground Film Festival between December 8 – 16.  MUFF is an ideal venue for films with an offbeat approach to their genre.

I am one of two executive producers, the other being Philippe Mora, who made a remarkable UFO abduction movie himself:  Communion, starring Christopher Walken.

Communion beat out Close Encounters in the Movieweb survey linked here: https://movieweb.com/best-alien-abduction-movies-ever-made-ranked/

I made a UFO movie for the  Sci-Fi Channel, “Official Denial”, aimed at family audiences. Both Philippe and I share the X Files’ belief that the truth is out there

 

Finally, after decades of denial, the recent United States Congressional hearings showed authentic radar footage of UFOs, or UAPs as they are now being called, and acknowledged such phenomena has yet to be explained.

Philippe Mora and I support High Strangeness because it is creatively ambitious; an example of gonzo, seat of the pants film making at the micro budget level. Producer Destiny West and writer/ actor/ director/ editor Casper Jean Rimbaud made the film basically with their bare hands.

One of the many subsets of Horror Cinema is psychosis horror. Who could forget this image from Roman Polanski’s Repulsion?

Sam Fuller’s Shock Corridor,  Martin Scorsese’s Shudder Island are classic examples of a character’s descent into madness.

Writer director Casper Jean Rimbaud, for his first film, has adopted a meta approach to psychosis horror, as viewed through the prism of popular culture conspiracy theories.

Here’s the trailer:

High Strangeness is a UFO abduction fever dream, told not from outside, but from inside the principal character’s psychosis.  Abigail is under stress. She is moving into her deceased parents’ empty farm house in remote Western Australia with her 10 year old  sister, but her boyfriend, who’s supposed to help, keeps being delayed by a business deal that will not close.    

Abigail suffers from a syndrome of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder known as ‘pure’ OCD; random intrusive thoughts and corner of the eye manifestations  cutting in and out, unable to be dismissed., causing her world to become a warped, surreal and frightening place.  The secrets of the house seem to come alive. Time, memory, and delusion elide, with tragic results.

The director uses this disjunctive framework to homage his heroes – Hitchcock, Carpenter, Craven, Hooper, Kubrick, Polanski, Von Trier, Scorsese, Coppola and Spielberg He conjures up a dark side of the moon Close Encounters, filtered though the pastel atomic-age flying saucer movies of the 1950s. Particularly the original ‘Invaders from Mars’. Rimbaud underscores his mixed media image making with a sound design of creeping dread. His stated intention is to make a simulation of psychiatric distress. ” I didn’t want to make a film about a woman losing her mind. I wanted you to lose your mind with her.”

High Strangeness is part experimental, part arthouse horror, with a subtext of sympathy for people with mental health issues. I hope the MUFF screening will attract a distributor. With the right handling, High Strangeness can reach a world wide audience of UFO devotees ready to download a provocative riff on their favorite subject.

 

THE PANTHER PICTURES ARE NOW A BLU RAY DOUBLE BILL

 

THE PANTHER PICTURES DOUBLE BILL

The 1980’s and 90’s were the heyday of VHS. Movies that in the previous decade played as double bills in drive in theatres and downtown grindhouses were now available at your local video store, offering a level of violence and nudity that was not allowed on broadcast television. Now in the comfort of your living room you could slip a cassette into the video player, and enjoy your favorite drive in movie fodder.

Martial arts movies were a staple of the lucrative VHS market, at which DAY OF THE PANTHER and sequel  STRIKE OF THE PANTHER were aimed. These movies were the brainchild of stuntman and writer and aspiring director Peter West and his wife at the time producer Judith West.  The pictures were to be shot back to back in Peter’s home town of Perth, West Australia, on 16mm then blown up to 35mm for delivery to the few buyers who wanted theatrical release. Offering 35 mm delivery as well as a video master helped disguise the 16mm origins, a low budget indicator that could result in low ball offers. The plan was to deliver two fight packed  movies that looked like US $1M productions, but make them for AUD 500K each. With production in Australian dollars and international sales in US dollars,  the currency exchange rate in 1987 could add 12% to any incoming foreign revenue. The plan was to make a star of Perth martial artist Edward (Eddie) Stazak playing secret agent Jason Blade, and kick off a 5 movie  franchise.

The budget was raised entirely from private investors. No government funds were involved. Investors insisted on the appointment of an experienced producer to oversee the enterprise and appointed Damien Parer, whose many credits included my 1985 movie DEAD END DRIVE IN.

Production commenced in March 1987. Four days into the shoot, I received a call from Damien Parer. Would I be able to travel from Sydney  to Perth in West Australia immediately and take over two low budget martial arts movies being shot back-to-back in twenty days each? The investors were unhappy with the footage and wanted the first-time writer/director replaced. From this troubled start began one of my most enjoyable shoots—the Panther Pictures.

I had read the scripts overnight and again on the flight. The stories of both movies followed a familiar formula; simplistic plotting with characterization to match. Many credibility issues.

Part 1: Martial arts expert and undercover cop Jason Blade goes after a criminal gang, responsible for the death of his partner. He puts the crime boss and his chief enforcer behind bars.

Part 2: When the enforcer escapes from jail, kidnaps the hero’s girlfriend and threatens to blow up the city, our hero goes back into action.

I arrived in Perth midmorning due to the time difference. Damien screened some  footage. We assessed what 3 days of shooting had produced.

Eddie Stazak, playing hero Jason Blade, was not a trained actor. He was a formidable martial artist, who could also sing and play the accordion. He had charisma when in action, but his persona in dialogue scenes was flat. He was not well served by the script which was full of awkward cliched dialogue. Damien Parer could do nothing with these issues till there was a change of leadership. The one fight scene shot so far demonstrated that both Eddie and his fight choreographer Jim Richards, who also played his chief opponent, could deliver vigorous brawls.

A good fight movie could still be built around them . We could not cure the inherent absurdity of the material. The best course was to embrace it, make it more fun.  All the other scenes shot so far  involved the heroine and the crime lord, who in our view were woeful. We decided to recast them and throw away all that had been shot so far. We would substantially rewrite the scripts, adding significant new characters and a backstory explaining the otherwise unexplained secret society of ‘Panthers’, whose initiation ceremony features on the French DVD sleeve. But shooting had to continue regardless. We could not afford to lose another day.

Damien had a new writer Michael Brindley on board within hours. I got on the phone to find a new leading lady. I called Nicole Kidman, my BMX Bandits star. She thanked me but said her agent told her not to accept any more low budget movies. Next morning, I started a 2-day chase/fight sequence that would not be impacted by the proposed changes to the scripts. Then on the weekend I would fly back to Sydney and find a new leading lady.

I would choose Paris Jefferson, a beautiful drama student whose dancing expertise had been featured in music videos. The existing scripts were already short, particularly the sequel. A dance montage in each movie might add a minute of diversion for the target audience. I chose not to cleanse the scripts of underlying sexism, preferring to underscore it with humor, and highlight the  machismo inherent in the concept of such movies.

I have taken over a number of movies before or during shooting. When an out-of-towner takes over from a home town boy, there are issues of loyalty and resentment that have to be handled with sensitivity. I told the crew I had considerable sympathy for my predecessor, who had done some great stunt driving for me on Dead End Drive In, but the show must go on, and I needed all their help. My philosophy is for everyone to share my love for the nuts and bolts of the work, and to have fun in the process. No crew functions at their best in an atmosphere of blame. So I try to find humor in routine mishaps and delays. You’ve got to get everyone as enthusiastic about the project as you are, particularly your star.  Eddie was like a deer caught in the headlights, and I mean that kindly. His hopes for a successful launch to his career seemed dashed when the director got fired, and I had to build those hopes back up again. Luckily Eddie grew to  believe in what I was doing, and was pleased with the result.

We had a very productive first day, got some good action, and finished on time. They were my crew thereafter. Damien Parer created a similar atmosphere in the production office, which had to deal with a daily changing schedule. We were stepping into the abyss. Rewriting, recasting eight roles, and choosing new locations while continuing to shoot two movies with interwoven schedules is not the normal recipe for success, but Damien always radiated a firm confidence and bonhomie that was contagious. Every call sheet had Panther jokes on it. Appreciation for services above and beyond the call were acknowledged. There was almost a cheerful wartime camaraderie in the office. Damien was able to persuade the investors to come up with more money to replace the lost shooting days, and add two guest stars, John Stanton and Rowena Wallace, to the marquee, both well known TV names.

We created the character of Anderson (John Stanton) who initiated Jason Blade into the crime fighting society of the Panthers. He became the father of Blade’s partner Linda (Linda Megier) who is killed in the opening sequence. The character of Gemma became Anderson’s niece, who would inevitably  hook up with Jason Blade. We were then able to use John Stanton, as a narrator, providing Panther backstory,  and  giving the narrative some spine and direction, which the original script didn’t have. Without the Hong Kong backstory, (shot in Perth’s Chinatown plus some stock shots)  creaky and hokey though it is, the film would have made even less sense.

I gave Rowena Wallace, a popular soap opera star an opportunity to play a tough SWAT team commander.  Stanton and Wallace’s names on the credits would ensure a sale to Australian television, and indeed the Nine Network bought both pictures a few years later. Well regarded stage actor Michael Carman blessed us with an amusing Snidely Whiplash crime lord.

I would inject humor wherever possible. The brothel fight sequence in Strike of the Panther is a good example. Chicken Man, Billie Bunter, and Madam Lash came to me in a Pythonesque moment.

The shoot galloped along, each day cherry-picking scenes from both evolving scripts, while staying at least a day behind the ongoing rewrite. One day I arrived at a location I had not seen, needing to find other locations for a chase, to work with supporting actors I hadn’t met, to shoot a scene that still lacked credibility on the page. By the day’s end, I was able to persuade the owners of a nearby apartment block to let our stunt actors climb up the balconies. There’s no adrenalin rush quite like directorial theater sports. One complication was a shortage of trained martial arts stuntmen in Perth.

Fighting for the camera requires selling the blows rather than inflicting them. There’s an art to making unarmed combat convincing yet safe. Eddie and Jim understood the dynamics of fighting for the camera and how to cheat the punches; the ability to snap your face to the side just at the right moment as the fist is swinging past the chin. By adding the right sound effect, it looks like  contact. There were eight fight scenes in the first film and nine in the second. That’s a lot of fist-fodder for Eddie Staszak, but we could afford only three experienced stunt fighters who could handle complex choreography. They would be backed up by recruits from local martial arts clubs. But the key opponents across seventeen fights had to be played by three guys.   The solution: disguises!

In the first fight, against stunt player Linda Megier, they wore Halloween masks:  Skull Mask. Geezer Mask and Pig Mask.

This concealed the beards they had grown during prep for their next appearance as New Thugs. Then they shaved their beards and dyed their hair to become fresh faced victims of the flying fists and feet of Jason Blade. By the time we arrived at Strike of The Panther’s climactic battle in the power station, the only option left was—Hockey Masked Ninjas!

In one multiple combat, I had to add a similarly disguised Jim Richards to increase the numbers of assailants. He then changed costume and resumed his role as the evil Baxter for his final duel with Jason Blade. Eddie had a catlike grace in the fight scenes. Jim’s choreography was inventive and the equal of any Chuck Norris movie of the 80s. Together they delivered the goods for the core martial arts audience. On the first day of the sound mix I discovered that the soundtrack of the fights contained only sound effects, impacts, without an accompanying grunt and groan track, vocal reactions that bring the combat to life, part of the Kung Fu genre’s DNA. So all the male yells and groans in the finished pictures are provided by yours truly. As each fight came up in the sound mix, I would lay down  a track for each fighter. AGH! EURR! EEK! Great fun. The studio receptionist volunteered to do the female tracks. She channeled her inner Zena, and performed with gusto.

I wanted the fights tough but not unpleasantly so. Characters bleed but they bleed politely. I was sensitive to the recent “video nasties” controversy in the UK and fine tuned the violence accordingly. The British Board of Film Censors gave both pictures an ‘18’ rating. Day of the Panther passed uncut. Strike suffered 4 cuts. One of the forbidden images was featured on the VHS sleeve of FISTS OF BLOOD, the US title for Strike of the Panther.

At 1 hour 2 mins: as black figure in mask jumps onto rooftop remove sight of his throwing star and subsequent shot of the star embedded in man’s face.

  • At 1 hour 6 mins: after close-up of woman with short black hair holding rifle remove shot of man in black with white mask twirling chainsticks.
  • At 1 hour 6½ mins: after hero has run man through with sword remove subsequent close-up of man twirling two butterfly knives.
  • At 1 hour 11 ⅓: in sequence after shot of woman binding arm, remove all sight of chainsticks as hero battles two figures in black and subsequent shot of hero using chainsticks in battle which follows.

In 1988, martial arts violence generally earned the ‘18’ certificate in the UK, The cuts for Strike seem consistent with BBFC Secretary James Ferman’s personal mission to keep certain types of weaponry out of films in an attempt to reduce copycat behavior. Nunchucks, or chainsticks, first popularized by Bruce Lee, were always firmly in his sights (a gag involving a twirling string of sausages in the first Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) film had been cut, and the family comedy A Very Brady Sequel (1995) skipped cinemas altogether because of a problematic scene involving nunchucks.

Guild Home Video brought Eddie Stazak and Jim Richards to the UK for a publicity tour and fight demonstrations, which ensured a lot of exposure for the VHS releases. This was peak Neighbors and Home and Away TV fandom time, when the Brits were keen on all things Aussie. The Liverpool Echo  describing Eddie and Jim as, “The new dynamic duo of martial arts movies,” noting for their readers that they are both thirty and single. “Fast-moving thriller” said the Dundee Courier “there’s enough action to ensure steady rental business.” Variety, in the US, said the “Fight scenes, staged by thesps Stazak and Richards, are effective and Jefferson makes a beautiful redheaded leading lady.” Paris Jefferson would go on to a solid acting career that continues to this day in UK and Canada. Here she is playing the Goddess Athena in a Zena episode.

Edward Stazak would make one more but  little seen movie Black Neon with Jim Richards. Both men went into different careers. Jim Richards started his own gymnasium and health center and occasionally choreographs fight scenes for friends.

Eddie became a devout Christian and quit both show business and martial arts. He still plays the accordion.

The Panther Pictures sold well to the home video market across the world. It’s interesting to compare the way different countries styled their artwork. Eddie manages to look Greek, Latin, Turkish, Slavic, Eurasian as required; a key to his appeal, and to the success of the Panther Pictures to this day.

The poster artists all seem to get into the spirit of the thing.

 

I’m proud of the Panther Pictures, an 80s time capsule brimming with cliches, stereotypes, and dated genre tropes to celebrate and satirize. There’s something about campy fun that seems to travel well between generations,  At Portland’s Hollywood Theater I was gratified to watch an audience of nearly 300 Cinema geeks chortle and occasionally howl with laughter. I hope you have the same experience.

*****

ARCTIC BLAST – It’s finally here, 12 years after I shot this movie.

America experienced some extreme climate change this morning. A nippy 19 degrees fahrenheit, as I stepped out the door.  The cautionary climate change movie that I directed with this title 12 years ago was conceived as a disaster movie / family drama hybrid, intended for either Sci Fy  Channel or Lifetime. It was shot in sixteen days in Hobart Tasmania, then two subsequent days in Ottawa, Canada for the US scenes with Bruce Davison. Popular Sci Fi star Michael Shanks plays the brilliant but unorthodox physicist who saves the world.

Publicity releases state the budget was $5M, puffing it up for sales purposes. Try $1.8M and all the creative compromises that budget implies. However, I’m quite proud of the film. It’s a strong example of its micro-genre, and I had a good time making it. I enjoyed working with young cameraman Marc Windon, whose father and brother had distinguished cinematography careers. Brother Steve Windon has shot five movies for Fast & Furious director Justin Lin. Marc and I shared an affection for the mini-jib with its variety of angles and moves the rig provided from a fixed position or on a dolly track. The mini-jib got us through nine pages of dialogue in a big set on Day One.

As a kid I always liked those panic in the streets scenes in Ray Harryhausen movies, and (an early favorite) Gorgo; here, the pursuing monster is the freezing fog.

We had limited funds for extras, but we got some nice shots of the panicking crowd rushing past camera in the bottom half of the frame with the roofs of buildings in the background.  Our intrepid special effects crew then built miniature cardboard outlines of those roofs, painted black and positioned them in a black limbo. We rolled camera in slow motion as an offscreen fogger pumped a white cloud rising over the line of roofs, and curling downwards. The two elements would then be composited by a company in Montreal.

Certainly, it was a challenge to make what looks like a bank of thick morning fog feel scary. We could see cause; we needed more effect. More graphic freezings perhaps, where victims toppled and broke into pieces. But that would have disturbed the family side of the audience, at whom the climate change message was aimed.

Overall, I am quite happy with the Attack of the Deep Freeze sequences. It got some acknowledgement in the review by Urban Cinefile:

Trenchard-Smith does orchestrated chaos well, and the sense of panic—crucial to conveying fear to the audience—is dynamic, and well served by Mario Sevigny’s score.

Strangely, Arctic Blast did not sell to the SyFy Channel; too much family drama, not enough Sci-fi, not enough kills. Nor did Lifetime or Hallmark pick it up; too grim, too foreign. But in foreign markets it did surprisingly well. When it premiered on cable in Spain for instance, it scored a 15.6 market share meaning it was seen by over 2.5 million viewers. The producers emailed me ratings from France’s TF1 and Germany’s RTL 2 which they described as “stellar”.

Some smart programmer should be booking ARCTIC BLAST onto a streaming platform near you!

RICHARD THE THIRD – The Real Game of Thrones: Can CHARLES THE THIRD resolve the enduring mystery?

 

Once upon a time, politics was truly a blood sport.

As Shakespeare tells it, King Richard The Third murdered his brother, three of his in-laws, a cousin, several friends, countless rebels, and, most heinously, two nephews, the Princes in the Tower, in a blood drenched plot to steal the throne of England. He then poisoned his wife, in order to marry his niece.

 

Shakespeare got it wrong. He fashioned Tudor propaganda into one of the greatest plays ever written. Then, like base metal turning into gold, drama transmuted into accepted history, culturally reinforced during the last hundred years by a gallery of stage and screen stars portraying the ultimate wicked uncle.

This was the first silent movie version in 1911, with famous speeches conveyed by title cards. It ran 23 minutes. In 1939, Basil Rathbone, seen here getting final touches of make up, played Richard The Third in Rowland V. Lee’s ponderous Tower of London, for which Shakespeare’s material received no screen credit.

Roland  Lee had a track record in swashbucklers (The Count of Monte Cristo)  and horror (Son of Frankenstein) and he tilted Shakespeare’s catalogue of Richard’s crimes towards horror, casting Boris Karloff as Richard’s fictional executioner Mord, with a clubfoot no less. The mixture does not gel.  Universal spent $580,000 to make it in black and white. Expensive battle scenes shot in Tarzana, Los Angeles, were marred when rain machines caused papier mâché helmets on 300 extras to melt.

A young Vincent Price  played the luckless Duke of Clarence.

Price would take on the role of Richard The Third in Roger Corman’s threadbare $200,000 remake in 1962, which borrowed battle scene footage from the original.

Vincent Price plays Evil Richard with his customary gusto, as you can see in this  clip from the torturing of Jane Shore on the rack.

 

This never actually happened. It was Henry The Eighth, 65 years after Richard’s death, who had a woman racked almost to death, tearing ligaments, dislocating limbs,  before ordering her burned at the stake. Henry was the real monster. The real Jane Shore, wife of a prominent London merchant, and mistress of the late King Edward, was sleeping with at least two of Richard’s enemies, when they were caught in a conspiracy against him. Some conspirators were executed.  Richard punished Mistress Shore with the harlot’s walk of shame. She was made to parade barefoot through the London streets wearing only a petticoat, to be jeered at and pelted with filth.  This historical incident inspired the naked   “ shaming of Circe Lanister” in Game of Thrones. Here’s a clip from the expurgated version on UTube.

In 1955, Laurence Olivier, after acclaimed stage performances, filmed his version  of Richard The Third in VistaVision and Technicolor. It’s interesting to compare the interpretation and vocal delivery of Price and Olivier.

Of the various films of Richard The Third, my personal preference is the Ian McKellen version, setting Richard in a 1930’s fascist England.

Contrary to Shakespeare, Richard was a faithful husband and an embattled reformer,  outmaneuvered by multiple conspiracies in the final chapter of the thirty year fratricidal conflict known as the Wars of the Roses.  15th Century  historian John Rous described him as a “good lord” with a “great heart” who punished “oppressors of the commons”. He reformed the law, requiring free legal advice be available to the poor. No longer could juries be bought, or corrupt land lords forcibly confiscate property based on flimsy accusations without due process. At the microlevel,  he even protected the rights of Yorkshire trout fishermen, preventing magnates penning the rivers and harvesting the majority of the trout themselves. He was a promoter of literature and the burgeoning printing industry, causing Chaucer’s work to become popular. He ordered all laws previously written in French or Latin be translated into English to be understood by the commons. Richard was a religious man, mentored as a child  by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and introduced to values of justice and chivalry.

Contrary to Shakespeare, Richard’s marriage to Anne Neville was not an exploitative exercise in spoils of war, an attempt to grab her wealthy estate. Richard and Anne Neville grew up as cousins, often in each other’s company. She too had been a sickly child, Perhaps Richard and Anne were bonded by the political chaos that afflicted their childhood. Each suffered traumatic reversals of fortune, as power shifted back and forth between Lancaster and York.   Both lost their fathers in battle. Anne had been unwillingly married  at 14, widowed a year later.  The estates of her husband and father Warwick as rebels were forfeited to the Crown, It is probable that 19 year old Richard felt sorry for his 15 year old cousin’s undeserved misfortune, which was about to get worse. Richard’s older brother, the greedy, duplicitous Clarence, had his eye on Anne’s estates, but also wanted to keep the fallen enemy Warwick’s daughter as his ward to make an advantageous marriage with another influential family.  Clarence, claiming ignorance of her whereabouts, even concealed Anne in his wife’s household, requiring her to dress as a maid, until Richard personally rescued her.He waived any right to her estate to placate Clarence. Richard married Anne Neville, if not out of love, then, at least, kindness. So much for my reading of Richard’s underlying character.

The disappearance of the Princes in the Tower is the principal cause of Richard’s historical  infamy.  Thirty years later, Sir Thomas More wrote that the Princes were murdered by Sir James Tyrell, John Dighton, and Miles Forest, on the orders of Richard The Third, describing the crime thus:  “keeping down by force the featherbed and pillows hard unto their mouths, that within a while, smothered and stifled, their breath failing, they gave up to God their innocent souls.”

Sir James Tyrell was hanged seventeen years later, not for their murder but for treason against Henry The Seventh.  About 10 years after Tyrell’s execution Sir Thomas More wrote that Tyrell had spontaneously confessed this additional crime before his execution. There remains no record of such an important confession, something Henry The Seventh would have surely made public, to further legitimize his reign. There are many reasons to question More’s account.

\

Here’s a portrait of Sir Thomas More, as he rose through the civil service ranks. More was seven years old when Richard  died at Bosworth. More grew up in the household of John Morton, Bishop of Ely, one of Richard’s implacable enemies, from whom More got most of his information. Some historians have suggested that More was copying, or perhaps translating, Morton’s original material, written in Latin.

Pictured here in stained glass, John Morton was Bishop of Ely and a member of Edward The Fourth’s council, At this time, bishops were civil servants  who were awarded bishoprics and access to their revenues. Morton was a wily Church politician, a serial conspirator, and at 60+ years of age, an active participant in two unsuccessful uprisings, forced to escape to France till Henry Tudor invaded. After Henry  took the throne, he made Morton Archbishop of Canterbury and ultimately a Cardinal.  Morton played as successful a Game of Thrones as Henry Tudor.

Yet More never published The History of Richard The Third. Years after More’s  execution by Henry The Eighth, it was discovered among his papers, ending unfinished in mid sentence. More had been executed by Henry The Eighth for refusing to accept Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In 1935, Pope Pius XI canonized More as a martyr, thereby rendering More’s writings as virtual holy writ.

Over the last century, several historians have disputed More’s account. In 1997 three Justices of the United States Supreme Court held a mock trial of Richard The Third for the murder of the Princes in the Tower. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Stephen G, Breyer ruled unanimously that Richard The Third was NOT GUILTY. Narrowly reported, soon forgotten.

This got me thinking

It’s time for a wrong to be righted, I decided one day, while in a quixotic frame of mind.

Naturally, my next thought was : a movie is the quickest way to present the case for the defense to the widest possible jury pool, Indeed, such a film, if well publicized, might stimulate popular debate, and in the process, challenge the enshrined verdict on the most infamous child murder in British history.  Maybe this will serve to further encourage Buckingham Palace to authorize DNA testing, hitherto refused, on key circumstantial evidence pointing to Richard’s guilt: the two skeletons found in the Tower of London centuries later, presumed, but never confirmed, to be the Princes. The latest technology that authenticated Richard’s skeleton could confirm, or refute, whether the bones now resting in Westminster Abbey shared Plantagenet DNA. Certainly I had chosen a quixotic mission for my next spec script .as writer/director. Who Dares Wins, right? So sticking closely to contemporary records, I wrote a script that followed Richard, Duke of Gloucester from the crisis that enveloped him in April 1483, precipitating his seizure of the throne, to his death two years later in the battle of Bosworth.  It was styled as a coup d’ état political thriller in medieval dress.

First you need the backstory: A month before his death Edward The Fourth wrote a will making his brother Richard Lord Protector of the Realm, and Guardian of Edward’s children, three daughters and two sons; the firstborn, also named Edward, being his designated successor. The threat Richard faced was one that dynasties and crime families have faced throughout history. when hereditary leadership passes suddenly to a minor.  Rival factions will try to take control of the child till he comes of age, enabling them to rubber stamp the elimination of their enemies.  Immediately upon King Edward’s death, conflicts that had roiled beneath the surface for years burst into the open and would engulf Richard.

Loyaulté Me Lie – Loyalty Binds Me – accompanied by the white boar of York was Richard’s personal motto, emblazoned on banners and tapestries. He served his brother the King with unswerving loyalty despite numerous inducements to betrayal from his envious brother Clarence. He even pleaded for Clarence’s life, when Edward ordered his execution. Contemporary records reflect a man with a moral compass.

I presented Richard as an idealist, who wanted to reform the law and curb the power of the magnates and the Church. You could say that’s like herding cats with a touch of wack-a-mole. Writing  as I was at the beginning of the Obama Presidency, perhaps influenced by the nightly cable news slugfests, I wove in how propaganda was as powerful a weapon in politics then as it is now. Paid rumor mongers at taverns, pamphleteers, graffiti; the lo-tech equivalent of the internet. To address the central mystery of the Princes in the Tower, I proposed Harry Stafford, Duke of Buckingham as the one who commissioned the  murder; the most likely suspect with access, motive and opportunity. With hindsight Buckingham can be seen as the Iago-like advisor in Richard’s ear, pushing him towards a pre-determined trap.  I supported the theory that one Prince survived to become Perkin Warbeck, the Pretender, ten years later, thereby offering the possibility of a follow up movie.  To sugar the history lesson, the script was spiked with bawdy humor, bursts of action and a rousing Battle of Bosworth climax. This featured Richard leading an heroic death or glory charge with only 80 knights that plowed through Tudor lines, and according to contemporary reports, brought Richard within 10 yards of Henry Tudor, killing his bodyguard with a battle axe, before he was cut down.  I wrote a screenplay that I believed was achievable  – as a UK/EU co-production in 2009 – within a 20 million dollar budget, depending on casting.

Casting. Aye, there’s the rub.  A star of significant wattage would be needed to play the starring role, or a brilliant unknown actor with a gallery of stars around him. While resemblance to portraits of historical figures is helpful in movies, it is not essential. This is a facial reconstruction of Richard created after his skull was digitally scanned.

Richard’s relatively slight stature would be the important element to maintain in the casting choice. A brief digression on Richard’s physical appearance.

“Richard liveth yet”, a family chronicler once wrote. He was a sickly child. then an undersized lad, a foot shorter than his eldest brother Edward, and not as handsome. He was not the charming extrovert his older brother Clarence was. Quite the opposite. Quiet. Introverted.  Perhaps regarded as the runt of the litter, expected to die in infancy as many children did.  However Richard’s  health improved once he began training in horsemanship and military arts, a major part of a young noble’s education, starting at age seven. At age twelve, Richard was reported riding in armor recruiting troops for his brother. Extended practice with lance, axe and sword would lead to his right arm and shoulder being overdeveloped. Also examination of Richard’s spine has revealed a distinct rightward curve of between 65 and 85 degrees with some twisting. This scoliosis had a spiral quality that would have been noticed, when after Bosworth his naked corpse was slung over a horse and taken to town for public display. This gave rise to the subsequent hunchback rumor that Shakespeare embraced.

If I was casting today, I think Daniel Radcliffe would make an interesting    Richard The Third, as a noble, determined, tortured soul. From Harry Potter to Kill Your Darlings to Weird Al, he has dared to take risks, and his persona  guarantees audience identification with his characters.

Another leading figure in the story was Elizabeth Woodville, who became Edward The Fourth’s Queen Bess.

I thought Nicole Kidman would be perfect as the proud, devious, and ultimately tragic Elizabeth Woodville. Like all writers I fantasized about my cast. Might as well imagine their chemistry even if it never happens. I saw Mel Gibson as the wily and energetic John Morton, rebel Bishop of Ely, played as a man of 50 rather than 64. I saw Tilda Swinton as Margaret Beaufort,  ambitious mother of Henry Tudor and Tom Hiddleston as the crafty Henry, Brendan Gleeson as Tudor’s uncle, the old war horse Sir Jasper Tudor. Jude Law as Hastings, Richard’s friend, who Richard executed for treason. Robert Pattinson as the ultra devious Buckingham,  Another key character is less well known – Duarte Brandao,  an adventurer and ship’s commander, who outwitted the Woodville fleet when it tried to abscond with half the national treasury. A short, largely CGI, fog shrouded naval engagement would add a fresh dimension to the recreation of the period.

Duarte Brandao was eventually known as Sir Edward Brampton. He was raised in Portugal by a Jewish mother, the  illegitimate son of a probable nobleman. After killing a man in a duel, Duarte was forced to flee Portugal and sought service with Edward The Fourth in England. He distinguished himself  in battles on land and sea  throughout the Wars of the Roses became a close associate of Richard The Third. Duarte  converted to Christianity – though in late life he converted back – and was knighted by Richard in 1484, as Sir Edward Brampton, the first man of Jewish origins to receive that honor. I wrote the role with a wry humored Antonio Banderas in mind.

If the script could snag two of the names in my dream cast, there was a chance financing could come together. My last spec script had been optioned. Would I get lucky with this one?

An early career as a trailer maker no doubt influenced my vision for the first three minutes of the movie:

Body on Page One. Always a good start.

Lotsa bodies, even better.

Dynamic action and title montage, succinctly synopsizing the 30 year Wars of the Roses, set to powerful music, precipitating immediate crisis.

Identify principal characters when introduced by name, and rank. to provide historical authenticity.

Keep history exciting. It is.

I also put my thesis out front and center. That’ll get their attention.

FADE IN:

EXTERIOR. BATTLEFIELD. DAY

A white rose fills the screen. We cruise round its glorious petals, suddenly struck by flecks of blood. Gradually the rose turns from white to red, then divides into two, a White rose on the left, a Red rose on the right.

INTERCUT TITLES:

SHAKESPEARE GOT IT WRONG

Thundering hooves sound of an approaching cavalry charge  build to a crescendo. An explosion of impact, as two waves of heavily armored knights collide head on. Lances transfix riders and horses.

THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE RICH DID THEIR OWN FIGHTING

The fallen are trampled by a hundred hooves.

1450 KNIGHTS

A cloud of arrows pincushion a cluster of infantry.

39 EARLS

Men in armor battle on foot. One falls, his arm sheared off at the shoulder.

17 BARONS

In crimson water, a hundred men hack and slash at each other.

7 DUKES

Another armored warrior is struck from his horse. A foot soldier quickly kneels and cuts his throat.

2 KINGS DIE IN BATTLE

OR BY EXECUTION

Burly executioners thrust the neck of the gibbering Henry The Sixth across the block.

HENRY THE SIXTH

“I am your King! I am anointed by God!”

Nonetheless, the axe falls.

A bleeding teenage knight rips off his armor. as he runs across a foggy battlefield strewn with dead and wounded.

EDMUND PLANTAGENET, EARL OF RUTLAND, LORD CHANCELLOR OF IRELAND.  AGE 17.

Men in armor loom out of the fog. Edmund Plantagenet freezes, then sinks to his knees. A knight steps forward removing his helmet, revealing a man in his mid twenties, seething with triumphant rage.

THOMAS, 9th BARON DE CLIFFORD. AGE 25

BARON DE CLIFFORD

“Thy father slew my father, so will I slay thee and all thy kin!”

He rams a dagger into the boy’s throat.

EXTERIOR. THE GATES OF YORK.  DAY

A soldier hammers a long nail through Edmund’s now severed head, securing it beside two other heads to a beam over the entry way. A crowd watches.

TWO POWERFUL FAMILIES, THE HOUSE OF LANCASTER AND THE HOUSE OF YORK, FIGHT FOR CONTROL OF ENGLAND.

INTERIOR. WESTMINSTER ABBEY. DAY

A coronation is in progress.

FINALLY THE HOUSE OF YORK PREVAILS.

JUNE 28th 1461

The Archbishop places the ornate crown of England on the head of a tall,  golden haired 20 year old.

ARCHBISHOP

“By the grace of God, Edward The Fourth, King of England and Ireland.”

The camera homes in on Edward’s strikingly handsome face.

INTERIOR. ROYAL BEDCHAMBER.  NIGHT

APRIL 9th 1483

Matching Angle: The same face, bloated by 20 years of excess, the fair hair now balding and streaked with grey, the breathing rasping and uneven.

Propped up on pillows, semiconscious, King Edward The Fourth is at the point of death. Courtiers stand at a discreet distance. A choir intones a hymn. Beside the death bed is his wife BESS, 48 years old, still strikingly beautiful, and unaffected by her husband’s imminent passing.

QUEEN BESS, WIFE OF EDWARD THE FOURTH,

BORN ELIZABETH WOODVILLE, A COMMONER

The Queen’s gaze rakes the crowd lining the walls, focusing on a petite, fair haired woman, 38 and still seductive, tears on her cheeks.

 JANE SHORE, FAVORITE MISTRESS OF THE KING

Jane Shore contemplates her uncertain future.

Standing nearby is a silver haired, well dressed noble in his early fifties.,

LORD WILLIAM HASTINGS, CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND

Lord Hastings looks at Mistress Shore, compassion inflected with lust.

She notices.

The Queen turns to a Bishop standing beside her,.

JOHN MORTON, BISHOP OF ELY, MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL

THE QUEEN

“How soon will my son be brought to London?”

MORTON

“Two weeks, if the weather is kind.”

THE QUEEN

“Keep the Duke of Gloucester away.”

MORTON

“The King’s will has appointed him Guardian of the Princes and Protector of the Realm.  ”

THE QUEEN.

“They must not be allowed to meet.”

MORTON

“A sufficient escort will prevent interference.”

THE QUEEN (curtly)

“See to it.”

The dying king stirs.

MORTON

“Can he hear us?”

THE QUEEN

“Place your hand on my breast.”

MORTON

“Your Majesty?”

THE QUEEN

“You heard me.”

Edward’s eyes flicker. His breathing quickens.

Morton glances back at the retinue lining the wall, then steps beside The Queen as if to offer comfort by taking her arm. Instead, shielded from view, he places his hand lightly across her breast. She grasps his palm, pressing and rubbing it slowly round her breast. Edward, staring at them,  utters a groan of pain. She addresses her husband with honeyed venom.

THE QUEEN

“This is for all the whores you took when my bed was ever willing.”

The Queen kneels down, close to the King’s face as if to pray.

THE QUEEN

“Remember the day we met, did you think ahead to this day?”

Edward shudders.

THE QUEEN

“No, you didn’t  think further than the end of your prick. But I did.  You thought you could drink and gorge and fornicate forever.  God had other plans.  The kingdom is mine now…I shall rule through our sons.  Those who scorned me and my family will learn to fear us. So, dear husband, hurry along…I will soon send your brother to keep you company.”

EXTERIOR. MIDDLEHAM CASTLE  DAY

A face snarls into camera.

RICHARD

“I am the Ogre! AGH! I eat you up!”

RICHARD, 30, a man of below average height, lean with muscular shoulders and arms, is playing tag with the delighted children of his key lieutenants at a family picnic outside the castle walls.

RICHARD, DUKE OF GLOUCESTER, THE KING’S BROTHER

Richard scoops up a little girl squealing with delight, and whirls her round. ANNE, 27, Richard’s wife, smiles at her husband, whom she has known since childhood.

ANNE NEVILLE, DUCHESS OF GLOUCESTER

Beside her sits their seven year old son NED. He puts down a half finished apple and runs towards his father.

ANNE

“Dickon, your son wants his turn.”

Anne watches her husband give Ned the sensation of flight, wheeling him round and round.

NED

“Whee! I’m a  falcon!”

RICHARD

“Nay, an eagle! An eagle!”

Three more twirls, then Richard places the boy beside his mother, Ned keels over from dizziness.

NED

“Thank you, father. Whoo!”

RICHARD

“This work is hard.”

ANNE

“When men bear the children, we ladies will hear your complaints.”

All the women laugh. Noting a nearby retainer watching with his family, Anne whispers to Richard like a good political wife.

ANNE

“And don’t forget Percy’s children.”

Richard appreciates her insight. She is the love of his life.

Anne sees a group of horsemen galloping across the field towards them, a royal pennant flying.  She knows this is not good news.

******

The screenplay ran 135 pages. My representatives felt there were only two companies that would be interested in taking on an expensive British themed costume picture: BBC Films and Working Title Films,  Both companies turned it down: one for being “too fawning on Richard”, the other, which had a competing screenplay, as yet not produced, concluded that “bad Richard” was more fun.  My mission to restore the reputation of a maligned King of England had failed. Who dares does not always win. But it’s always worth trying. My interest in Richard’s cause persisted.

Soon enough, BBC & STARZ announced plans to turn the best selling cousins’ war novels by Philippa Gregory into series. Those novels at least provided some counterpoint to the Thomas More narrative. Further impetus to restoring Richard’s reputation was provided by the discovery of Richard’s skeleton in 2012, under a car park in Leicester. He was subsequently buried with Royal protocol.

This was an amazing story in itself, and is now the subject of its own movie The Lost King. Sally Hawkins,  plays the real life lady Philippa Langley, whose single minded dedication to finding the actual burial place of Richard The Third led to his skeleton being uncovered and authenticated.

Naturally I was keen to watch the 2013 BBC/STARZ series The White Princess, which over 10 episodes depicted the turbulent era through the eyes of the key female characters involved, mainly Elizabeth Woodville played by Rebecca Ferguson. It was a star making role. Tom Cruise watched the series and cast her in his next two additions to the Mission Impossible franchise.  This version depicts the murders of the Princes in the Tower as having been instigated by Margaret Beaufort, the mother of Henry Tudor, the future King Henry The Seventh, to eliminate them as future claimants to the throne.

The White Queen, despite excellent performances, disappointed me overall.  Critics were a little underwhelmed. The Los Angeles Times  review concluded: ” Shoveling three novels and 30 years of very confusing history into even 10 hourlong episodes requires that “The White Queen” become a series of vignettes rather than a cohesive narrative, a “greatest hits of the Wars of the Roses,” as it were. Years collapse into minutes, intricate policy is condensed into cardboard personalities, and the characters are swiftly categorized as good or evil.”

Certainly, the writers were set a challenging task. Shot in Belgium on a budget that limited the scale of sets and crowd, the grandeur of the era was absent. Zippers and tourist guide rails visible in some palace locations were among the anachronisms critics pointed out. To disguise the lack of large bodies of troops. the Battle of Bosworth Field was staged in a forest. From my perspective, the most disappointing aspect was that the complex issues of Richard’s reign were crammed into the last three episodes of The White Queen. Richard deserves three seasons of his own.

However, this TV show coupled with the discovery and Royal burial of Richard The Third has focused public attention on the central mystery of his reign: did he, or didn’t he?  My view: To have ordered the murder of his two nephews whom he would have played with as infants at Yuletide gatherings, the sons of the brother to whom he was devoted, is incompatible with Richard’s character as revealed in the documented facts of his life.

King Charles The Third has recently stated that he is open to DNA examination of the remains of the presumed Princes, currently resting in Westminster Abbey. If neither skeleton contains Plantagenet DNA, a significant piece of circumstantial evidence against Richard is eliminated. If only one has Plantagenet DNA, that supports the Perkin Warbeck theory of one Prince’s survival – a page was mistakenly killed in his place., and the real Prince was smuggled to Flanders disguised as a servant in the service of Sir Edward Brampton, He would invade England as the rightful King and die as Perkin Warbeck, the Pretender.

I hope DNA testing goes forward. It will not solve the mystery, but it would be a good step forward.

END

****

 

EDUCATION: How Latin, Greek, History and a scrap of military training gave me a career…

While in the UK in June, I paid a visit to my old school. (1959- 1964) A discursive review follows.

American and Australian readers probably view the Public Schools of England  through the lens of the Harry Potter books and movies.  Prior to J.K. Rowling’s  fantasy representation,  there was a somewhat more jaundiced satire expressed in British director Lindsay Anderson’s first feature film IF….

It divided critical opinion in the UK on first release.

The majority appreciated Anderson’s sharp satire of Establishment values, which he would expand further in O LUCKY MAN, and BRITANNIA HOSPITAL  

I am connected to IF… in a few ways. The film was written by David Sherwin who had been schooled at Charterhouse. He told me he based the public school culture and traditions depicted in the screenplay on a combination of Charterhouse and Wellington, where he had friends.  Wellington College had been my school too. Lindsay Anderson’s IF…  certainly resonated with my ten years in boarding schools, though the experience for me was altogether more positive. So imagine my excitement, when four years after leaving Wellington, National Screen Service in London assigned me to the trailer for IF… 

FLASHBACK…to three weeks earlier, when my boss, trailer maven Esther Harris and I had both been at the office of Paramount (UK) Publicity Chief Gerry Lewis. No, not comedian Jerry Lewis but Gerry Lewis, the longtime Paramount executive in London. He gave us his brief which I paraphrase from memory as follows: “Do what you like, just don’t say it’s set in a school.” He invoked the old Hollywood adage: School pictures, boxing pictures, prison pictures rarely work at the box office. For every success in these genres there are ten failures.”  In other words, avoid scenes like these:

Gerry Lewis wanted a trailer that broadened the appeal of the movie beyond arthouse. Make it feel youthful, intriguing, vibrant. Although almost all the film was shot in a school, I took his  caveats on board, and gave  IF….‘s trailer a Swinging Sixties vibe, with fast cut dialogue lines in ironic juxtaposition, punctuated with flashes of action.  No good deed will go unpunished.

” I don’t know what the fuck’s going on!” Lindsay Anderson, pictured here with star Malcolm McDowell,  screamed at me from the front row of the theater as the lights came up. “You’ve trashed my film!”   He would make his own trailer, one that was ” most definitely set in a school!” Not an auspicious start to my second assignment for the company. Luckily Paramount did not have amnesia about their briefing, and was understanding. Here’s the official trailer for IF…:

So, in contrast to the British Public School represented by IF…,let’s visit the real Wellington College. My wife and I were the guests of an old school friend Chris Potter, whose family has been part of Wellington culture for 92 years. .

Chris spent his childhood at Wellington, which his father Arnold Potter had joined in 1932. Potter Senior was a distinguished mathematician, highly respected Housemaster and mountaineer extraordinaire both in the Alps and reportedly on chapel spires. Arnold and Fraye Potter encouraged music, expanded the wider life of students, and were revered teachers in my time. Their son Chris started at Wellington a few months after me, became Captain of Cricket and Head of School. Leadership training was a focus of post-war Wellington’s ethos.  For my part, I captained the Fencing team the year we beat Eton. After Cambridge, Chris taught mathematics in Australia, before joining the Wellington faculty. He became the House Master of the Hill for 17 years, and then Secretary of the Old Wellingtonian Society, which is active in charitable work, Later this year,  the newly refurbished sports clubhouse – known as “The Pink Pavilion” in my day –  would will be renamed “The Potter Pavilion”  in honor of the Potter family for their dedication to generations of Wellingtonians. This was taken by its original architect on opening day in 1902..

The new Potter Pavilion can be seen in the distance overlooking  afternoon cricket. I was a slogger. Often clean bowled. Ah,  but the joy of boundaries… 

I had visited Wellington before; once in 1999 when in the UK to make BRITANNIC, a fictionalized version of the sinking of Titanic’s sister ship in 1916, clearly influenced by all the British naval warfare films I saw in childhood. Here’s the trailer, if you are curious.

While prepping BRITANNIC, I contacted Chris Potter and was able to arrange for a Wellington student, interested in film production, to shadow me for a day. I’m not sure if he ever went into film. And I got to fence with the college epee team too. During my recent visit I was interested in the vibe of today’s Wellington College, which became fully co-educational in 2006.  Driving up the kilometer from the gate, turning right at the lake towards the main buildings, my view seemed unchanged from my first arrival 63 years ago.

Inside the first quadrangle, I was reminded of how fortunate I had been to spend five of my school years amid such beautiful architecture.

School culture in 1959 long held that the ornamentation below the crest were the Duke of Wellington’s balls. Amusement at prurient detail evident in my formative years has not abated. Which brings me to the Iron Duke himself, indeed a man with balls, a major soldier statesman of the 19th century in whose memory the school was founded. He had died of a stroke in 1852. Queen Victoria officially opened Wellington College seven years later.  

The future Duke was born Arthur Wellesley in Dublin, Ireland,  the fifth son of the 1st. Earl of Mornington.

Young Arthur Wellesley was an unpromising student at Eton.   “I don’t know what I shall do with my awkward son Arthur.” stated his widowed mother, who sent him to a military academy in France, being, in her words, “food for powder and nothing more.”  History would tell another story. Early in his career, Wellesley enforced discipline, and developed a reputation for valor. In India, he had one horse shot from under him, another bayonetted.  

Knighted in 1805, Sir Arthur commanded of British forces in Spain, where his aptitude for military campaigning, and  guessing what lay  “on the other side of the hill.”  delivered a string of victories throughout the Napoleonic wars.



His soldiers admired his calm demeanor under fire, his attention to keeping them properly supplied, his judgement whether to be cautious or bold. They called him “old Nosey”, due to his prominent beak, which this portrait captures. His eyes were reportedly an intense blue.

The 1815 battle of Waterloo, was in his words ” a close run thing”, but a timely assist from Prussian Field Marshall Blucher ensured Napoleon’s defeat and made Britain the dominant power in Europe for the next hundred years. I worked on the original trailer for Serge Bondarchuck’s WATERLOO in 1970. Here is a fan made trailer, in which Rod Steiger plays Napoleon with scenery gnashing relish, while Christopher Plummer smartly low-keys Wellington.

In 2009 I viewed the battlefield of Waterloo from Lion Mound, the most impressive of the Waterloo monuments. The topography surveyed had changed little in over 200 years. 

After the battle, Wellesley was created the first Duke of Wellington for his services to the nation. As commander in chief, and one fluent in French during the occupation of France, he opposed a punitive peace, organized loans to rescue French finances, and recommended the withdrawal of occupying troops after three years. In this engraving, Wellington (far left) is seen alongside Metternich, Talleyrand and other celebrated European diplomats at the Congress of Vienna, 1815.

Between 1828 – 1830, Viscount Wellington was Prime Minister of Great Britain. His political career was hampered by the extreme factionalism rife in Parliament and The Palace. Wellington  was plain spoken with a gift for repartee. “”Publish and be damned!” he responded to an ex-mistress threatening blackmail. He even fought a duel with an abusive ultra-Tory, the earl of Winchilsea, though both men deliberately fired to miss. He opposed political reform, because what he saw after reform –  “on the other side of the hill ” – was revolution: one that could give rise to another populist dictator like Napoleon. His premiership was divisive. There were two assassination attempts. The windows of his house were twice smashed by radical mobs, It is said that the iron shutters he installed re-enforced his  image as The Iron Duke. To deconstruct this satirical cartoon: Wellington is casting a shadow across The Radiance emanating from The King, the titular head of the Protestant Church of England, because he allowed the passage of the much needed Roman Catholic Relief Act. Interesting to compare with today’s political memes.

Historians have come to view Wellington more kindly, and as a  shrewder statesman than his contemporaries. Wellington’s military, political and personal life, is rich and complex. Film and television portrayals of the Iron Duke so far have been one dimensional. He deserves a granular dramatization at the top BBC/HBO level. I tend to see all of History as screen drama just waiting to be filmed. But that’s just me. But here’s a thought: Wellington’s fond relationship with his celebrated charger “Copenhagen” could provide a thread of Spielbergian sentimentality, as well as a linking device for an episodic narrative. A Napoleonic era WAR HORSE perhaps, the  trailer for which reflects the hard life of a cavalry horse. Great image making.

Standing 15 hands high, with a muscular physique on a small compact frame, Wellington’s Copenhagen was an unusual horse, who was partial to eating while lying down.

Wellington said of Copenhagen “There may have been many faster horses, no doubt many handsomer, but for bottom and endurance I never saw his fellow.” As demonstrated when Wellington rode him for seventeen hours continuously during Waterloo.

With the battle ended, Wellington dismounted. While walking away, he patted Copenhagen on the flank. The horse then kicked back towards the Duke’s head. which the Duke, apparently,  narrowly avoided. But the special bond between horse and rider remained unbroken. Copenhagen continued to be his primary horse throughout the occupation of France, and subsequent victory parades in England, before a long comfortable retirement on one of Wellington’s estates. where he was reported to “like being noticed” and “kissed hands and ate his apples with all possible grace.” Copenhagen is celebrated at Wellington with this remarkable sculpture.

Across the Quad from Copenhagen is the Chapel, which in our time we all attended after breakfast every day, and twice on Sunday.  No longer obligatory, religious instruction is now available to students of all faiths. 

The magnificent Harrison organ dates from the 1920’s.  I recalled its sonorous accompaniment to our hymns.

I could not resist declaiming a couple of verses of Ecclesiastes from the lectern.

Nearby is the Chinese Language center. The expansion of language learning is a major Wellington focus. Third Form pupils choose two from French, German, Mandarin, Russian and Spanish, all of which can be taken through to GCSE, A Level and IB Diploma.

Wellington has tuned its curriculum to  keep pace with modern industrial technology. In the Mechanical Engineering Department, there’s a high end plasma cutter, for instance. With time and patience, you could build a racing car…

Art and fashion design, architecture, computer graphics, electronic programming are among a diverse range of studies available.

Drama and the performing arts have a new facility. In 2011, former Wellington College pupil, Sir Christopher Lee opened the fully equipped theatre  named in his honor.   

With auditorium capacity around 346, it’s as well equipped as any West End London theater.

The main dining hall offered much a better lunch than I remember.

The vibe among the young people we met, despite the pressure of end of term exams, seemed relaxed and happy.  On the far wall, among portraits of  previous Masters (headmasters), is Sir Anthony Seldon, who in 2006, introduced classes on happiness and well being.

Seldon’s focus on internationalism has resulted in Wellington establishing six sister schools in China and Thailand. He advocated for a holistic personalized approach to education rather than what he called “factory schools”.  Seldon’s ten year tenure as Master is considered to have been transformative to the school’s culture. 

The hanging flags display the crest of each of the school’s houses, which were named after Wellington’s generals. I was assigned to the house celebrating General Murray. All Wellington’s Generals went on to distinguished careers.

Sir George Murray was Wellington’s Quartermaster General during much of the Peninsular campaign. He was present at nine battles.   Murray  became President of the Royal Geographical Society.  The Murray River and Mount Murray in eastern Australia, were named after him.

Pride in military history  resonated with the sons of Britain’s World War Two generation. My father survived being shot down in France, and dug tunnels in Stalag Luft 3 for the Great Escape. 76 of the intended 250 POWs got out. My father was close to the exit before the escape was discovered.  A Wellingtonian, Squadron Leader Roger Bushell, masterminded this extraordinary mass breakout. He was one of 50 escapees shot by  shot the SS.                 

Our fathers’ war was culturally dominant as we grew up. Books, movies, documentaries,  comics provided a two decade long group therapy session for the nation, and it shaped our world view. . Naturally I joined the school’s Combined Cadet Force. Here, IF…’s Malcolm McDowell, in his star making debut, uses the same 1912 Lee Enfield bolt action .303 rifle with which we cadets trained for war in the nuclear age.

Promotion in the CCF beyond corporal was hampered by my tendency to see far too much humor in the physical practice of military activities,  With my 8mm camera I shot the Drill Cadre performing flamboyant Turkish arms drill. Clearly I was destined to be a future Monty Python fan. But Wellington encouraged a student’s declared passion, in my case movies, and gave me a dozen rolls of Kodachrome to make a year long record of the school’s activities, which I did with both affection and irreverence. I got to stage a brief battle scene  with a dozen fellow cadets storming foxholes,  It was a rush.  Smoke. Blank firing. Thunder flashes.  (The  8mm. film has since been lost.) The CCF left its mark. Initiative. Teamwork. Logistics. The experience showed me the effectiveness of intercutting wide angles with images that compressed defenders with attackers. A  fan made trailer for my Vietnam film THE SIEGE OF FIREBASE GLORIA. shows influences (amongst others) of  1964’s ZULU, and my fondness for blowing things up.

The Murray was my home for five years in a similar block to this, with 30 other boys, living in a corridor lined with cubicles on each side, in which we slept and studied after classes and sports. I managed 4 middling ‘A’ levels, and 7 ‘O’ levels.  

With seniority, we moved up the long corridor to the rooms closest to the balcony. I visited the Murray, trying to see where I had carved my initials on the sandstone wall outside its balcony.

Like these students, I sat for exams here, known as Old Hall, now renamed Waterloo Hall.  It was also used for concerts. World renowned classical guitarist Julian Bream performed for us one year.  I

Old Hall was also the venue where friends and I performed a comedy revue on my final night at Wellington. “Carmen Heroidum” – the songs of heroes –  mixed pop culture satire, iconoclastic jabs at school traditions. and the kind of absurdist humor that was brewing in the minds of public schoolboys across Britain in 1964 that would see public expression five years later by the public school educated Monty Python team.

The flyer is a little arch. But Bond movies were prime zeitgeist among teenagers, with the GOLDFINGER  premiere eagerly awaited in two months.

At the dress rehearsal, the master vetting the production felt one sketch and several jokes were too irreverent and must be dropped, an instruction we ignored to great response.

We all had a great time putting it together. Sadly Hug (Hug) Sayers, who became a Captain in the Welsh Guards, was killed, alongside the Governor of Bermuda Sir Richard Sharples, by terrorists, as he drew his pistol in defense. One thing that never leaves you after five years at Wellington is a sense of professional duty.  I hope the rest of the cast and crew went on to satisfying lives. My friend and fellow producer Julian Beaumont had a distinguished career in banking, and has been awarded the Order of Australia Medal (OAM) for service to the arts and the health and care of the aged.

The subsequent review.

 

True. An over -the-top streak can be found in several of my films. For those that like such things, try NGHT OF THE DEMONS 2, LEPRECHAUN IN VEGAS, LEPRECHAUN IN SPACE.

I feel immense gratitude for the excellence of my education, which prepared me well for my future career. I wish all children everywhere could receive such a start in life.  There is no more important investment that a country can make than in the education of its future generations.

Here’s the Wellington College website, which offers more pictures.      

Home

 

 

REVISITING MY BRITISH CHILDHOOD BEFORE THE FALL OF BORIS…

 

How social history is depicted in movies has always fascinated me. I will offer some films that sprang to mind as I reviewed happy snaps from my recent visit to the United Kingdom.

From the age of five, I walked down Odiham High Street hundreds of times before I sailed to Australia at nineteen. In 1953, I had watched from this spot, as part of a cheering crowd, newly-crowned Queen Elizabeth pass up High Street with her motorcade, an event which provided Britain with a much needed mood lift after the hardships of World War Two. It was a hopeful time. Rationing was ending after a dozen years. For example, sausages had been rationed from 1943. The way some people in rural districts got around the rules is the subject of a deliciously wry comedy of middle class rivalry A PRIVATE FUNCTION, starring Michael Palin and Maggie Smith and Denholm Elliot, who capture the sensibility of post war village life with affection, social comment, and mordant humor. It’s a lot of fun in the spirit of those classic Ealing comedies. Here’s the trailer.

Visiting this June, I found that Odiham, despite inevitable modernization, continues to retain that home counties village charm that I recall from my childhood. It’s a sought-after location as the million pound realtor’s price tag on this house in the High Street indicated.

My parents bought Kings Cottage, the house in which I grew up, for four thousand pounds sterling in 1953. Alas, the original Georgian portico with stained glass inlay is no longer there.

During my 10 years of boarding school, I would live in Kings Cottage four months of holidays each year. The house faced onto a large field,  containing community vegetable garden allotments. All gone now.

Each day, I would walk down King Street to where it ended at Odiham’s Norman era Church. The first recording of Odiham as a township was in the Doomsday Book of 1086.

Walking through the churchyard, I came across the graves of two French naval officers, prisoners of the Napoleonic Wars, inscribed with the words: Death Hath Made Him Free.

Naturally, my mind wandered to the Napoleonic Wars (1803 – 1815), in particular naval warfare of that period as it has been depicted in movies. I have two particular favorites.  HMS DEFIANT (UK)/ DAMN THE DEFIANT (US). A ripe, early sixties, patriotic melodrama, with Dirk Bogarde and Alec Guinness at the top of their game, and some well-staged battle action. As a seventeen year old, I loved it.

And, of course, with greater depth and nuance, there is Peter Weir’s excellent distillation from the MASTER AND COMMANDER books.

Walking down from Odiham Church, on the way to the High Street, I would enter Stoney Alley, the key points of which have been documented and preserved, where possible, by the Odiham Society.

Among the interesting artifacts on display are the stocks, a form of punishment authorized by local courts which imprisoned the feet or hands of minor offenders, enabling offended community members to pelt the helpless victims with rotten vegetables and excrement. This form of public shaming has now been replaced by the social media.

Often accompanying the stocks in medieval times was another engine of stress position torture – the pillory. This gives me the opportunity to show you a scene cut from the original theatrical release of A KNIGHT’S TALE, starring Heath Ledger and Paul Bettany. The distributor wanted to reduce the running time and cut three sections, including this lengthy speech by Paul Bettany, playing Geoffrey Chaucer, author of The Canterbury Tales, in which he pleads for his friend. Bettany demonstrates his Shakespearian skills in this masterful piece of rhetoric. He was disappointed that it was cut from the film, but was glad to see it back in the Blu Ray. Check it out here.

Reaching the High Street, it was time for a sandwich and local ale at the George Hotel, where as a youth I got away with underage drinking due to being six foot tall at age thirteen.

Margaret would like to clarify she does not drink alcohol (I drink enough for both of us). A pleasant ale, less bite than an Oregon IPA, but ideal for a summer afternoon.

It’s been seventy years since I first walked these lanes. British rural life seems much the same as I remembered.

A two mile walk from the High Street is the little hamlet of North Warnborough, through which runs the Basingstoke Canal.

Thirty miles long, the canal issues permits for a limited number of houseboats, either as holiday homes or tourist rentals, which can moor alongside houses with the owners’ permission. Nice solar power panels.

Naturally, the Cary Grant / Sophia Loren romantic, if lightweight, comedy HOUSEBOAT a (1958) is the first  title that springs to mind. Grant’s wife Betsy Drake wrote the original script, and Grant originally intended that she would star with him. After Grant began an affair with Sophia Loren while filming THE PRIDE AND THE PASSION (1957), he arranged for Loren to take Drake’s place with a rewritten script for which Drake did not receive credit. Grant’s affair with Sophia Loren ended in bitterness before The Pride and the Passion finished shooting.  Grant had hoped to resume the relationship, but Loren meantime had agreed to marry producer Carlo Ponti instead. This caused serious problems on the Houseboat set. Check out the cringe-worthy, sexism-driven trailer.

Walking further down the canal, you will come across Odiham Castle.

In my childhood this place was known as King John’s Hunting Lodge. He built this multi level stronghold over seven years at a cost of one thousand pounds. It was well appointed, with bedrooms, a banquet hall, and tapestries hung to  disguise the walls made from flint stones.

 

 

 

King John rode to Runnymede from his hunting lodge, and reluctantly signed the Magna Carta, the first document to limit the powers of the King, which became a cornerstone of constitutional rule.

John had no intention of honoring the agreement, and spent the remaining year of his reign laying siege to the castles of his rebellious barons, as depicted in the British movie IRONCLAD (2009), starring Paul Giamatti.

Odiham Castle itself was attacked by France the next year, before King John died of dysentery, and France made a deal with his son, who became King Henry the Third.

With many twists and turns, representative democracy slowly evolved in England into what it is today, a political system in which the citizens have the right to change their government at the ballot box, and the government has the right to replace a leader who has proved too many times to be untrustworthy. The British system has many safeguards in place which prevent an autocrat from hanging onto power. The United States, which has derived so many governmental precedents from Britain, has profited from its example.

 

 

ALICE THROUGH THE MULTIVERSE… a ripping yarn that should be a streaming series.

 

Twenty years ago I wrote a paranormal thriller for myself to direct entitled The Executioner’s Daughter. Its genesis was a dream.  All I could remember were a few images. A riot overwhelms a medieval execution… A young girl flees through the forest in a blinding thunderstorm… She wakes up in a 21st Century psychiatric institution…If dreams are the subconscious putting out the trash, what tortured region of my mind did this spring from? Or was it just psychic screen grabs evoking movies I had seen, or maybe a movie I would want to see?  I immediately started devising a story that could incorporate innovative action sequences from my personal wish list. The finished script was a time paradox /chase movie that combined historical drama, with the contemporary spy thriller via a Freaky Friday premise;  a 21st Century girl on the run in medieval England; her 16th Century counterpart hunted by rogue intelligence agents in contemporary London. These things can happen when there’s a glitch in the Multiverse and separate stands entangle…

My screenplay was optioned twice but no green-light. The story still gnawed at my liver. So I turned it into a novel. This enabled me to delve into the background of the characters, revealing how they were shaped by past events, and offer wry comments on the culture and politics of their times. I introduced new characters into the narrative including England’s Queen Mary, dubbed by History as “Bloody Mary”.  To be fair, Mary only burned 300 Protestants, while her father Henry the Eighth reportedly executed 58,000 rebels during his reign.

You will also meet Queen Mary’s estranged half-sister who would one day become Queen Elizabeth 1st. In 1553, the then Princess Elizabeth was imprisoned in the Tower of London under investigation for treason. A powerful faction at Court feared Elizabeth’s Protestant leanings and were determined she should not reach the throne when the ailing Mary died.

A significant new character in the novel is Pamela Van Doren: a young environmental activist, charismatic and wealthy, who is funding the clean up of plastic garbage in the Pacific Ocean.  The wide ranging environmental policies she advocates threaten entrenched financial interests.

I don’t want to reveal more about the story. There are surprises. It is best you peel away the layers from scratch. The novel’s expanded edition is now called Alice Through The Multiverse, intended for those who enjoy a fast paced, time twisting, fantasy adventure in which a plucky heroine defeats conspiracies five centuries apart. The ending may particularly appeal to fans of  revisionist  history novels.

Reviews on Amazon and Goodreads were nice:

“slam bang non stop thriller never lets up…I love the ending.”

“ The characters are engaging and relatable. The prose is expert, with highly developed description and detail and a distinct sense of setting and emotion investment as you engage with the action of the novel… You’ll love it. It’s a great read.”

Goodreads: ” It’s like B-grade schlock, but with velvet drapery and an appreciation for the finer things. If action were cream, you’d call this novel decadent. However, if you’re a fan of his movies but think he was a bit constrained by budget and physics, then Alice Through the Multiverse is the perfect one-on-one with a treasure of an Australian filmmaker.”

As the reviewer implies, the novel is indeed a movie in prose.

H.G. Wells’s 1895 novel “The Time Machine” was probably the progenitor of the modern time-travel story, though he wrote an earlier one, “The Chronic Argonauts,” in 1888, The following year Mark Twain put a comedic spin on the premise with his satire A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, which ultimately spawned three movie versions, a 1921 silent, a 1931 talkie, and a 1949 musical. George Pal’s classic 1960 adaptation of The Time Machine was the first time-travel film to win an Oscar (for best visual effects). Planet of the Apes, and Back to the Future proved how well time travel married with other genres. Peggy Sue Got Married (dramady) Warlock (horror), Kate & Leopold (romcom) and stoner comedies (The Bill & Ted films).

The mechanics of time travel have always presented credibility problems. At the outset, H.G. Welles tried the literal approach by building a machine, Twain ducked the problem by having his Connecticut Yankee wake up in Camelot after being knocked unconscious by a crowbar. Audiences eventually ceased to be satisfied by such remedies.  Luckily science came to the rescue. An actual scientific theory, one that is yet to be proven or disproven, is easier for an audience to swallow.

Research into quantum mechanics have offered the string theory hypothesis of “the multiverse”; namely that life is not confined to one universe, rather it extends across a series of parallel dimensions with alternate timelines and outcomes, stacked one upon the other in a sort of cosmic hard drive, containing all the options of “being”. Limitless possibilities! Consequently movies and TV shows have embraced the multiverse as an acceptable time travel delivery system. . The latest excellent example is Everything, Everywhere, All at Once.

Alice Through The Multiverse offers a similarly wild and wacky tale. Maybe there is a rising film maker/ producer/star/entertainment executive out there who will download my novel as a fast airport read, and find the movie version playing in his or her imagination. After twenty years,  I think public taste, influenced by  Outlander, The Bourne franchise, Game of Thrones, is in synch with my original vision.  Alice could be a movie, but in the new recorded entertainment economy, perhaps the best format is as a streaming series.  To that end, I have written the pilot script, and a provisional outline for the first two seasons, not as holy writ,  but as a demonstration of what is possible. It is up to the appointed show runner to decide how best to shape the material for an audience. My role is to be executive producer. The gates to Apple, Netflix, Amazon, Paramount + and Hulu, are heavily guarded, so I will need an army of support to penetrate the defenses. This picture is from Danger Freaks, by the way; an example of a wish list sequence I was lucky enough to pull off in 1973.

Let’s start the process of rebuilding readership after Amazon/KDP cancelled my account in January. (See earlier blog re: autocratic algorithms) I have republished through Ingram Spark, and hope you will agree with the reviewer who found Alice to be “a compulsively readable page turner”.  Please spread the word if you enjoyed the movie you found playing in your head.  Alice Through The Multiverse can be ordered from your favorite bookstore, or on your Ipad as a Nook Book.  Here’s a link to the book on barnesandnoble.com.

 

 

Censored, Part 2: Alfred Hitchcock – Censorship Saboteur

Movie censorship, a mechanism of cultural control, was in direct contradiction to the instincts of film makers across the world. No director challenged the British Board of Film Censors and the Production Code of America’s restrictions more often, and more successfully, than Alfred Hitchcock. I offer a view of Hitchcock through the prism of censorship, against which he became a covert saboteur, quietly moving forward the needle of reform.

Many admirable biographies have been written about “the master of suspense.” Among them The Dark Side of Genius by Donald Spoto, and Alfred Hitchcock, A life in Darkness and Light by Patrick McGilligan.  Both are well researched and packed with illuminating material, but tend to focus on the negative sides of his character. However, Hitchcock’s movies are all the richer for understanding the demons that drove him. Collectively all commentaries past and present show how Hitchcock fed on the cultural influences and the anxieties of his childhood, then poured them into his movies.

Alfred Joseph Hitchcock was born  on August 13, 1899., the third child of a family that had been grocers and fishmongers for a generation. Shopkeepers were at the precarious entry level to the British middle classes. With hard work the family business prospered. The earliest surviving photograph of the future director was taken in 1906, posed with his father outside the family shop above which they lived. Young Hitchcock frequently accompanied his father to the crowded Billingsgate market to pick up produce for sale.

With a doting mother who was a good cook, food and its pleasures became an early preoccupation for Hitchcock. a pudgy child, who, as an adult, would occasionally top 300 pounds. He felt unlucky in his physical appearance, but quite comfortable with his own company. He took no exercise. ” I never walk when I can ride. My exertion is from the neck up. I watch”  he would explain. He had health problems for much of his life but despite an excessive appetite for rich food and alcohol, he lived to be 81.  Young Hitchcock read extensively. The family owned a bible and an illustrated Grimms’ Fairy Tales. Travel books opened his eyes to a wider world, as did studying six Shakespeare plays in one school year. A sketchpad and pencil provided an outlet for his creativity and a eventually a path to his chosen profession, in which he began self educating. By age 11 he was buying movie trade papers at a shop in Leicester Square – the Bioscope,  and Kinematograph and Lantern Weekly, known as the Kine. It was the start of a life long love affair with America.

Other factors contributed to Hitchcock’s fascination for the macabre. Older neighbors still talked about the 1888 Jack the Ripper murders that took place in nearby Whitechapel. Adjacency to one of the most famous crimes in British history would have amused Hitchcock. He grew up in a popular culture filled with lurid stories of crime, from penny dreadfuls to the flagship of sensationalist Edwardian media The News of the World  (circulation almost 3 million in 1920). I’m sure Hitchcock was a reader, both enjoying the schadenfreude of scandal yet noting, because his strongly Catholic mother brought him up to be compassionate, how grim life could be for those ensnared in the legal system. Flogging was still administered in gaol. Capital punishment was a regular occurrence in British life. In some years more than 20 people were hanged for murder including this fellow:  George Joseph Smith who managed to lose three wives by drowning, all in bathtubs, after they had made out wills in his favor. It was a notorious case that consumed British newspapers at the height of World War One. Murder had become serialized entertainment for the masses, and may have sparked 16 year old Alfred Hitchcock’s interest in marital murder, murder for money, and political murder that feature in his films.

Hitchcock’s father William was, by most reports, a kindly if nervous man, who was an occasional drinker while working long hours managing two shops. He still made the time to take his children to the music hall, and silent movies projected at the local skating rink on Saturday afternoons. But William could also be  strict. As boys do, young Hitchcock committed some disciplinary infraction, so his father sent him to the local police station with a note that the boy had been naughty. The policeman locked him in a cell, saying “This is what we do to naughty boys.” Hitchcock stated that  he always remembered “the clang of the door, which was a potent thing – the sound and solidarity of that closing cell door and the bolt.”  Something Henry Fonda experiences in The Wrong Man.

It’s an evocative story Hitchcock has told many times, with his duration in the cell ranging from a few  minutes to half an hour, and his age between from 6 and 11. Hitchcock was a fantasist by inclination and by trade.  But so vivid and “potent” is that memory and so regularly does the concept of unjust imprisonment run through his work, that I’m inclined to believe something of the kind happened, perhaps facilitated by his maternal grandfather a London policeman, maybe even as a joke. But it left a mark on Hitchcock’s psyche.

Montgomery Clift faces the same potential fate in I Confess, with the added spice that the wrong man is a priest.

Aged 11, Hitchcock was sent to St. Ignatius College, a Jesuit day school “for young gentlemen”. Report cards graded students on their conduct and application to their studies. Infractions, like not declining Latin verbs correctly, could be punished a lash from a rubber strap across the hand. Malefactors were required to chose which priest would administer punishment. It was prudent not to choose the priest you offended. Hitchcock sensibly selected his favorite priest, who dropped the strap lightly on his palm. Sin was the Jesuits’ main concern.  On March 10, the weekly sermon  was “Sin and the Justice of God”, followed on March 17 by “Sin and the Majesty of God”, with “Sin and the Christian” and “Sin and the Passion of Christ” to round out the month. The Jesuits provided a detailed education in every aspect of sin, which I suspect young Hitchcock relished. Mortal sin, Venal sin. The Sins of the Flesh! A feast for the pubescent imagination, with the seductive aftertaste of guilt. Hitchcock did not care for his Christian name Alfred, shortened to Fred or Alfie by his family. “I’m Hitch,” he would introduced himself, ” That’s Hitch without the cock.” displaying early in life  a flair for double entendre.  Hitchcock did not engage in play with the other boys, ” preferring to observe.” One fellow pupil said of him ” he was a fat boy…said little and was not easily engaged in conversation.. considered odd.”  They teased him as “stinking of fish”, knowing the common occupational hazard of his fishmonger father. As Hitchcock withdrew into himself during those two years, he expanded his reading and was diligent in his  schoolwork, earning prizewinning citations in Latin, English French, and Religious Studies.. Alongside his intellectual growth, an anti-authoritarian and iconoclastic instinct began to secretly take root.

World War One began when Hitchcock was 15. German Zeppelins periodically dropped bombs on London. When explosions resounded nearby, Hitchcock and other family members dropped to the floor, and hid under tables. It was the first time, he told a French interviewer, that he had ever experienced real fear.  Yet his recall was laced with a typically Hitchcockian vein of comedy. ” the whole house was in an uproar…but there was my poor Elsa Maxwell – plump little mother struggling to get into her bloomers, always putting both her legs through the same opening, and saying her prayers, while outside the window shrapnel was bursting around a search-lit Zeppelin. – extraordinary image!”  One that would influence a body of work filled with German accented villains, bombs, spies, assassins, and the death of innocents.

Hitchcock’s sense that life was fragile and arbitrary would soon be reinforced.  That year his father died of chronic emphysema and kidney disease aged 52.  The comfortable well ordered world in which he grew up had been turned upside down by a random unpredictable event, something he would regularly inflict upon the heroes of his movies as a springboard to suspense. For a time there was significant effect on the family finances. Hitchcock dealt with his grief, comforted his mother and got a job at 15 shillings a week to help support her.  His innate talent soon got him noticed and the rest, as they say, is history; a long and storied history.  

Vertigo was my introduction to his work came at age 13 when I went to a re-release of Vertigo double billed with a Rory Calhoun western Four Guns To The Border at the Regal Cinema, in Odiham, Hampshire,  Vertigo‘s initial release had performed below expectations. It was ahead of its time. Note how the re-release artwork hypes the thrills and spoils the ending to broaden the audience. That evening, the movie’s rich visuals, foreboding tone and the magnetism of the two stars took me to another world more completely than any previous film. Walking home it occurred to me that making films was a job. People got paid to do it.  A eureka moment. Vertigo, with its compelling set pieces, emphasized in this French poster, inspired me to study the medium and try my hand.

To many teenagers like me in the  1960’s, with dreams of making movies themselves one day, Alfred Hitchcock was an idol:  a film maker with total creative control. always seeking innovative ways to make drama more visually compelling. He was attracted to stories of moral conflict in which the audience experienced divided loyalties. This coincided with a taste for the macabre, ironic, and gruesome. He strove to push the boundaries of allowable content and would challenge censorship standards throughout his career. At heart, Hitchcock was a free speech advocate. Why, Hitch asked, should some subjects, particularly those involving sexuality, be forbidden in movies, but allowed in theater and literature?

Many books touch on how Hitchcock steered his films through decades of censorship oversight.  I recommend the recent Hitchcock and the Censors, by John Billheimer, which is both scholarly and entertaining.  All Hitchcock fans will enjoy it.  Hitch did not always win his battles, particularly in the early days, but he grew more adept, chipping away at the restrictions by setting little precedents along the way. Yet among the many  things the book reveals is how often the restrictions of the Production Code of America and the Catholic Legion of Decency prevented Hitchcock from highlighting the controversial element that attracted him to the source material in the first place. One example is 1939’s  Jamaica Inn.

The heroine of Daphne Du Maurier’s Napoleonic era novel Jamaica Inn is a plucky eighteen year old girl, who discovers that a pirate gang is luring ships onto the North Cornish rocks to kill survivors and pillage their goods.

Du Maurier’s villain is a clergyman, the Reverend Francis Davey, one so cynical that he has a secret drawing of himself preaching as a wolf to a congregation that have the heads of sheep. Such an image must have amused Hitchcock. It catered to his innate suspicion of authority figures, another benefit of Jesuit schooling. Besides, the Reverend was a Protestant, fair game for an irreverent Cockney Irish Catholic like Hitchcock. He was going to have fun with the villain’s hypocrisy,  particularly as played by star character actor Charles Laughton, here binding and gagging Maureen O’Hara with a degree of uncomfortable relish; Hitchcock again pushing the boundaries.

Laughton had discovered the young actress at Dublin’s Abbey Theater and insisted on her casting. Their next pairing The Hunchback of Notre Dame would make Maureen O’Hara a Hollywood star. The Legion of Decency and read the script and had a conniption at the prospect of a crooked officer of religion and threatened Hitchcock’s film with a “C” rating – Condemned, making its future release in the US unviable, without which the film could not go into production. As they explained, the evil Reverend Francis Davey violated the PCA’s ruling on religion.

SECTION VIII. Religion
1. No film or episode may throw ridicule on any religious faith.
2. Ministers of religion in their character as ministers of religion should not be used as comic characters or as villains.

So the villain’s profession had to be changed. He became Sir Humphrey Pengalion, a Justice of the Peace. Thus the institution of The Clergy was protected from ridicule; The Law less so. The Censor’s justification:

The power of the movies to influence society underpinned all the PCA’s concerns: The reason why ministers of religion may not be comic characters or villains is simply because the attitude taken toward them may easily become the attitude taken toward religion in general. Religion is lowered in the minds of the audience because of the lowering of the audience’s respect for a minister.

Hitchcock realized this was not a fight he was going to win against an institution with theocratic leanings. His contract with Hollywood producer David O’Selznick was in negotiation.  It was more important to avoid a confrontation with the PCA and effect a smooth transition from the British film industry to Hollywood.  His first American film was another Daphne Du Maurier novel with an ending that contradicted PCA moral strictures.

The Italian poster for Rebecca projected more sexuality than the film offers. But what attracted Hitchcock to Daphne Du Maurier’s brooding mystery was the delicious moral ambiguity of its conclusion.

The heroine accepts that her husband, albeit with some cause, killed his promiscuous first wife who was planning to ruin him. But the new young wife, when she discovers the truth, lies on his behalf, then stays with him, thereby achieving hitherto denied parity in their relationship.

Once again Hitchcock’s push for moral nuance in movies was thwarted. Absolutely not, said the PCA, if an accused murderer is guilty, he must be punished. To overcome the impasse Hitchcock suggested the “accidental death” revelation at trial, allowing the husband to be found not guilty, and conventional morality upheld. Producer David O. Selznick, already smarting from PCA restrictions on Gone with the Wind publicly declared the Production Code “insane, inane, and outmoded.”. But the “death by misadventure” version of the script was shot, shorn of the whole point of Du Maurier’s proto-feminist novel.

The book suggests there had been  a lesbian relationship between the late Mrs. Rebecca De Winter and her housekeeper Mrs Danvers. No, said the PCA, there can be no implication that Mrs. Danvers is a lesbian. But Hitchcock found ways to convey that implication through lighting, framing, and little touches like the ways Mrs. Danvers obsessively caresses Rebecca’s clothes.

Rebecca was a big hit, won two Academy Awards, and established Hitchcock in Hollywood as a stylish director, drawn to subjects with moral conflict.

As a Catholic, Hitchcock was attracted to the issues in the hit play I Confess in which a priest, played by Montgomery Clift in the film, is accused of murdering a blackmailer who threatened to reveal the priest’s illegitimate child. He goes to the gallows because he won’t reveal the identity of the real murderer, another victim of the blackmailer, whose confession of guilt is protected by the seal of the confessional.

Note the sensationalist approach in the posters for I Confess. Nothing suggesting the hero he is a priest.  The studio was nervous about the picture’s appeal to a wide audience, given that the dilemma at its core was one of Catholic doctrine.

” I was terrified of the police, the Jesuit fathers, of physical punishment, of a lot of things. This is the root of my work. ” Hitchcock once confessed.

Of course the Production Code nixed the priest’s illegitimate child. A secret worthy of blackmail became instead a chaste over night stay with a girlfriend before he entered the priesthood. But the PCA insisted that the real murderer be caught and the priest exonerated. Phew! Of course, Justice always prevails, the innocent never hang. Confidence in the criminal justice system must be preserved. The powerful anti-capital punishment ending of the play was not allowed. The trailer went all out to assure Hitchcock’s fanbase that I Confess would deliver the master’s trademark suspense.

Although he dd not succeed in keeping the original shock ending of I Confess, Hitch was a brilliant subverter of the rules.  In Leonard Leff’s “Hitchcock and Selznick,” the director explained how he distracted the eye of the head of the British Board of Censors, Joseph Brooke Wilkinson, or “Brooksie” as he was known. Although he was the top watchdog over movie sins, Brooksie’s eyesight was failing. During review screenings, Hitchcock recalled, whenever an “offending piece of film approached, I said ‘Mr. Wilkinson-.’ He turned his head toward me and the moment went by on the screen without him seeing it.”
But it was much harder going with the PCA under Joseph Breen.

In The 39 Steps, the male and female leads are handcuffed together while fleeing from both the police and enemy agents.

The two are not lovers, given that he is an accused murderer on the run, and she is an innocent, unwillingly handcuffed to him. Hitchcock created an amusing scene where Madeline Carroll has to remove both her stockings, dragging Ronald Donat’s hand within an inch of touching her thighs, first one leg, then the other. In an ostensibly non-sexual situation, though one charged with sexual tension, Hitchcock was able to put a sexual thought in the mind of the audience. And
the sin is after all in the eye of the beholder. The PCA examiners clearly did not like having such thoughts put into their heads and demanded this shot be removed.

Predictably they had serious problems with the next scene. Donat and Carroll are forced to spend the night together in a double bed. Unmarried in a Double Bed! All Night! Handcuffs! It was a worrying combination to the Breen office.

In the British version, the couple are fully clothed, and engage in verbal sparring. Donat eventually goes to sleep, then Carroll frees herself from the handcuffs. In 1934 not all British companies submitted their scripts to the PCA ahead of production for “do’s, don’ts, and be careful”, one of which was that not even married people were to be shown sleeping together in the same bed.   Before The 39 Steps could be imported, the PCA insisted that key portions of the scene of the handcuffed couple in bed be cut, including any shot that involved their physical contact, leaving the audience wondering how the handcuffs were removed. Hitchcock complained of the damage to the story’s credibility, but the PCA were adamant, observing that, if the script had been submitted in advance, “they would never have allowed the scene to be filmed in the first place.” Hitchcock gradually became more adept at getting his taboo touches past the censor.

I like the French poster for Notorious, pointing us towards the famous two and a half minute kissing sequence which passed by having the actors break off kissing every three seconds. The PCA had a prohibition against “excessively lustful kissing”. Historians differ on the legendary “three second rule”, which former Breen Office examiners denied existed. Perhaps early in Code enforcement, they requested the shortening of a lengthy kiss. It passed at three seconds duration,
and so became enshrined as a rule in the minds of studios and producers. Hitchcock was determined to find a way to sneak nearly three minutes of passionate love play past the censors. Before shooting the scene, Hitchcock abandoned the scripted dialogue, a witty exchange concluding with a kiss, much to the chagrin of writer Ben Hecht. It was laced with double entendres that could draw the examiners attention to Hitch’s underlying intentions, delivering the
screen’s longest kiss.

Hitchcock had Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman improvise innocuous plans for a chicken dinner, while nuzzling, whispering, exchanging more than 20 kisses, none longer than three seconds. They never leave each other’s arms, even when Grant moves inside from the balcony to make a phone call, throughout which the kisses continue, till the door closes on Grant’s departure. Total canoodle – 2 mins 40 sizzling heartfelt seconds.

Both Grant and Bergman felt uncomfortable by their close proximity throughout the scene, but Hitchcock wanted to lock the audience in there with them. He said: “ For the length of this love scene, we the audience are privy to the embrace between two of the most attractive people in the world, enfolded in it with them, vicariously yet also actively.”

Given his suppressed intoxication with Ingrid Bergman that dated from their previous film Spellbound, I wonder what emotions Hitchcock felt while shooting this prolonged physical intimacy, while his wife and creative partner, the ever supportive, but all-knowing Alma Reville, sat beside him at the camera. This picture, which speaks volumes, is taken from early in their relationship. Alma and Hitch remained devoted to each other until death.

The success of Notorious ensured a good start to Hitchcock’s post-WW2 career, with the prospect of more creative control. The world had changed radically in six years and many aspects of society were under review.  The psychological disruption and  hardship of the war impacted Britain’s 1945 election.

British voters, despite gratitude for Winston Churchill’s wartime leadership, threw out his Conservative Party, and installed a Labour Government that promised social change. Hitchcock hoped there would be a corresponding relaxation of censorship standards.  Perhaps audiences would be allowed limited reference to previously taboo subjects, like homosexuality. Hitchcock’s Jesuit upbringing had insured a prurient interest in the forbidden, yet his experiences in the film industry had shown him the clear contradiction between dogma and reality.  Forgive me if I couch it in terms Hitchcock might have appreciated –  namely that sodomites were just as talented, decent upstanding citizens as non-sodomites. During the year he spent filming at Babelsberg Studios in Berlin, Hitchcock watched famed and openly gay director, FW Murnau at work on his silent masterpiece, Der Letzte Mann (The Last Laugh).

Murnau was happy to show the 25 year old aspiring British director his storyboards and meticulous preparation of each sequence, a discipline Hitchcock adopted along with Murnau’s Expressionistic visual style. The fact that an early mentor was homosexual, and thus damned to Hell from a Jesuit perspective, clearly did not bother Hitchcock.  His fascination with sin stopped short of  judgementalism.  The Weimar Republic of 1924 certainly opened young Hitch’s eyes to a sexual tolerance not experienced in Islington.  One night his German colleagues at UFA took him to a gay nightclub, where a private party was taking place. According to author and critic John Russell Taylor, the group adjourned to a hotel room with two women, who “made various propositions which, perhaps fortunately, the terrified Hitch did not understand too exactly. ” He kept repeating “Nein. nein.” The women then began making love on a bed under the gaze of their guests sipping cognac. The young daughter of an UFA executive put on her glasses to see better, Hitchcock recalled decades later in conversation with fellow director Francois Truffaut,  adding dryly “it was a gemütlich German family soiree.”

Hitch had more than a passing curiosity in every kind of sexual expression, be it straight, gay, lesbian, whatever.  John Russell Taylor recalled Hitchcock saying that if he had not met Alma, he might have become ” a poof”. Maybe that was just Hitchcock’s penchant for shocking humor. In truth, he was a watcher, not a doer. There is anecdotal evidence that Hitchcock regarded homosexuality as a random fact of life, not deserving of moral opprobrium. In 1948, Hitchcock tried to sneak gay characters onto the screen, while convincing the Motion Picture Code of America he was doing no such thing. This required some fancy footwork when dealing with the PCA. ruled by conservative Catholic Joseph Ignatius Breen.

The PCA had an iron clad attitude to the subject of homosexuality. It was a sin, a perversion; at best a mental illness. The concern of this group of men with theocratic leanings was that allowing the subject in a mass entertainment medium will only encourage the “weak-minded” to try it.  If  homosexuality was eliminated from popular culture, it would eventually die out – was their rationale. By contrast, Hitchcock’s Jesuit education produced a man who was a covert iconoclast, an anti-authoritarian, sympathetic to the victims of circumstance. Sympathy for a cause is one thing, but why would a star director, with an Academy Award nomination and a string of successes behind him, want to even hint at a topic prohibited by the PCA? Hitchcock’s cause was simple. Freedom of expression. Hitch was a Free Speech warrior. No subject matter should be banned from the cinema screen. Every aspect of the human condition explored in literature and theater should be permitted in movies. Hitchcock tested the water with his next production, an adaptation of a British stage play Rope by Patrick Hamilton.

The premise of the play, a suspense thriller taking place in real time in a single location, appealed to Hitchcock’s taste for the macabre. Two young wealthy intellectuals strangle a friend, then throw a party. They serve food and drinks from the top of a chest in which they have hidden the body. Guests include the victim’s father, his fiancée, and their mentor professor who had introduced them to Nietzsche’s concept of the “superman” – one who is above conventional morality and the law.

The play drew inspiration from the notorious Leopold and Loeb trial in 1924 Chicago, in which two homosexual college students contrived to commit the perfect murder of a stranger to demonstrate their intellectual superiority. Hitchcock knew there was no way the PCA would pass such a story. However, there was nothing overtly homosexual in the text of the play. The sexual relationship of the characters was conveyed through the playing of the actors. Consequently, when Hitchcock submitted the play’s manuscript, such homosexual inferences as there were went over the sheltered heads of the examiners. On first reading, their only concern was an undue emphasis on “liquor and drinking” at the party. Breen and his cronies were an abstemious lot. Hitchcock then hired a gay writer, Arthur Laurents, to adapt the play for the screen, discreetly shaping the young characters as closeted gays who pass for straight, much as Laurents had to pass in the straight Hollywood of 1948.

Laurents and Hitchcock eliminated phrases from the play like “my dear boy” and “have a lovely excuse ” lest they might be interpreted by the PCA as gay parlance, but retained some coded gay stereotypes of the day; one character uses cologne and is mother-fixated. Hitchcock then cast gay actors Farley Granger and John Dahl as the murderers, with folksy James Stewart as their former professor, who, of course, unravels the murder during the party.

It tickled Hitchcock to share in the secret that writer Arthur Laurents and co-star Farley Granger were gay lovers at the time. Gay subtext was as far as Hitchcock dared to go, and he depended on Laurents, Granger and Dahl to pull it off under the unsuspecting noses of the Breen Office. Hitchcock knew that any requested censor cut would compromise the unique vision he had for Rope. His plan to amplify tension was to stage the real time drama in one apparently unbroken shot, running the length of the movie – 80 minutes. If the PCA demanded that lines of dialogue be cut, Hitchcock’s bold visual conceit would be ruined, or the costs of reshoots would be substantial. He adopted a pre-emptive approach. Stating that he was going to shoot the film in sequence, he requested the PCA view each reel as it was shot to flag any problems, starting with reel one and proceeding to conclusion. This was a sound strategic move. The PCA was now boxed in to tacitly approving the film reel by reel, without the benefit of context. Consequently each reel passed without comment. Even though the PCA had the right to demand cuts upon screening the film as a whole, Hitchcock gambled Joseph Breen had no interest in antagonizing a major studio with costly changes over gay subtext if he inferred it from the completed film. Indeed such subtext went over the heads of 90% of the US audience in 1948. It would take 10 years before critics of Hitchcock’s films would point out how Hitchcock broke new ground. It would take 20 years before homosexual characters would be permitted in major studio movies.

Hitchcock was a risk taker, In Rope, the first venture of his new production company Transatlantic Pictures, he danced around the edges of a taboo subject while adopting an enormously challenging production technique. Such hutzpah. Forgive me, if I get into the weeds of it here as a digression on his technical mastery. The theoretically “unbroken shot” running the whole length of the movie was achieved by a series of long single takes, roaming with the actors around the penthouse set. Through the panoramic windows Hitchcock placed perspective miniatures of adjacent Manhattan skyscrapers, complete with cotton wool clouds.

All walls and furniture were made mobile so they could be rolled out of the way of the big Technicolor camera as it moved through doorways, taking in new perspectives of the action and entered apparently confined spaces.

Rope is comprised of eleven such moving camera shots. The shortest is just under four minutes, the rest over nine minutes in length. The camera’s magazine contained barely ten minutes of film. Hitchcock designed these shots to be invisibly joined by “body wipes”. At the end of a long take, an actor would cross the foreground close to camera, or the camera would cross behind the actor – wiping the screen to a blur for a second. The camera would cut. The next chunk of the script would be blocked and rehearsed. The camera would roll again from exactly the same framing. The actor would repeat his cross past camera, which would then pan or dolly with him to a new perspective of the penthouse, as the scene continued without skipping a beat. The transitions between reels were accomplished by Hitchcock, buttoning a moment by homing in on an ornament or piece of furniture to end one reel, then starting the next reel with exactly the same shot, before the camera moves to the actors continuing the drama. If the projectionist handled the reel changes with precision, the illusion of an 80 minute unbroken shot was maintained, as it was when the PCA screened the completed film. They were not going to tamper with such a technical achievement. Rope received a PCA seal. However, once the media pointed out the similarities to the Leopold and Loeb murder, there was a backlash at the municipal level. The City of Chicago, where the murder had taken place, shut down the film because it was “ not wholesome entertainment”. When Warner Brothers appealed the ban, the city relented and allowed exhibition “to adults only” which worked to boost rather than diminish attendance. There were similar closures in Atlanta, Memphis, Spokane, and Seattle. Rope was banned outright in France, Italy and Holland. Hitchcock shot the movie in 18 days, including reshoots due to lighting discrepancies as the daylight transitioned to night. On its $1.5M budget backed by a 450K publicity campaign, Rope turned a modest profit. But contrary to Hitchcock’s expectations, the film’s single shot technique robbed the audience of the range of close ups such a drama needed and so diminished emotional engagement with the characters.

Hitchock’s next attempt to slide a homosexual character past the PCA was in his adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s first novel Strangers on a Train. Her dark and ingenious plot has two strangers starting a conversation on a train, in which each reveals frustration about a troubled relationship. Successful tennis player and aspiring political hopeful Guy (Farley Granger again) has an unfaithful wife who won’t give him a divorce. Bruno (Robert Walker), a psychopathic momma’s boy, would love his father to die. Bruno proposes they swap murders. In that way, each of them would have an alibi. Guy dismisses it as a joke, but Bruno goes ahead and strangles Guy’s adulterous wife. The iconic shot featuring her fallen glasses, passed by the PCA, was cut by the State of Maryland for excessive violence. Municipal censors were still flexing their muscles.

Bruno then blackmails Guy into fulfilling his side of the perceived bargain. Guy ultimately gets away with this murder, one of many boundary-pushing elements in the novel that Hitchcock knew would be prohibited by the PCA. So, in the script submitted, Hitchcock eliminated the second murder, maintaining Guy’s moral compass. The hero exposes the villain and defeats him mano-a-mano. The PCA nonetheless objected to the cynical attitude in dialogue to marriage, divorce and murder, in particular the concept that there is latent murder in all of us. Hitchcock was pleased that Breen and his examiners failed to detect the hints of Bruno’s homoerotic fascination with Guy. Hitchcock biographer Donald Spoto characterized their screen relationship as “a homosexual courtship.”

Gay code – Bruno speaks French, is mother fixated, and wears flamboyant clothing – went unnoticed. So oblivious were the PCA, that they even requested the deletion of a line from Bruno’s mother that would have suggested Bruno was straight; Bruno was “ going to spend the weekend with some girl”. A mother’s lack of concern over her adult son having sex before marriage was what caught their eye.

Hitchcock told Robert Walker (straight) to play Bruno with homoerotic subtext, and told Farley Granger (gay) to play a straight man oblivious to these undertones. The chemistry worked. As with Rope, the subtext was evident only to the discerning at the time. But over subsequent re-releases, Robert Walker’s subtle performance would be seen as the first clearly homosexual character in a 1950 American movi.. Hitchcock’s skill in building suspense and the rousing climax on the runaway merry-go-round made Strangers on a Train a solid hit, returning $1.8M on a $1.2M budget. It strengthened Hitchcock’s clout in Hollywood and his on-going challenges to PCA restrictions.

Strangers on a Train did have credibility issues. But it was bravura sequences like this that allowed Hitchcock’s audience to ignore plot flaws in his thrillers. Visuals took priority over script rigor. Hitchcock knew what the audience wanted from his films. A prime example of his expertise in mixing a good genre cocktail was North By Northwest.

The French/Netherlands poster for North By Northwest reflects foreign markets’ difficulty with the Hamlet reference in the title. Hitchcock expected some issue with the racy dialogue he had asked Earnest Lehman to write for stars Cary Grant and Eva Marie Saint, but his first serious problem was not with the Production Code Administration, it was with the Department of the Interior who had jurisdiction over Mount Rushmore, the location of the movie’s climax and
refused permission to shoot there. So Hitchcock sent a still photographer to shoot a variety of angles of the iconic monument to be used as back projections, in conjunction with replica sections built in the studio. The DOI, ever protective of the image of the Founding Fathers, got wind of Hitchcock’s plans to have actors clambering over their faces, and (OMG!) the hero hiding in Lincoln’s nose, who gives away his location in a sneezing fit. (HFS!) This gag was at the core of Hitchcock’s choice of Mt. Rushmore as the location for the climax. At one point the production’s working title was The Man in Lincoln’s Nose. DOI warned Hitchcock they would seek to block release of the film if it showed such desecration of a National Monument. MGM was not inclined to argue with the Department of the Interior. So Hitchcock sent a still photographer to shoot a variety of angles of the iconic monument to be used as back projections, in conjunction with replica sections built in the studio. Hitchcock staged the chase using the President’s faces only as backgrounds to the main action.

As for the racy dialogue and the “promiscuous heroine”, Hitchcock negotiated with consummate skill. It helped that the film had a light hearted tone, and the protagonists had such charm. Hitchcock argued that the immorality of Eva Marie Saint’s character’s was ordered by the unnamed counterspy agency she worked for, and therefore did not contradict the prohibition against unpunished immorality. Sex for Uncle Sam gets a pass.

In the dining car scene, between fugitive Cary Grant and the mysterious blonde he meets on the train, Eva Marie Saint, she states with a seductive smile “I never make love on an empty stomach.” At the insistence of the PCA, the line was re-dubbed as: “ I never discuss love on an empty stomach.”

Only film editors notice a slight discrepancy between the words her lips are forming with the words you hear. This line, like many racy quips in his screenplays, had been red-flagged by the PCA when the script had been submitted, but Hitchcock shot it anyway.  According to Hitchcock biographer Patrick McGilligan “the director bucked the code with exceptional tenacity in the American phase of his career, pushing the boundaries of sex and violence in his films. And he usually did so deviously, rather than by direct confrontation, stalling , surrendering by degrees, swapping one cherished transgression for another.

In this case, he traded the dubbed line for the later implication that intimacy had taken place the night before, a scene played by Grant and Saint as if basking in post-coital bliss even though they are fully clothed. Over a decade after Notorious, lips are locked for a full sixteen seconds at one point. This was acceptable because, as requested, the actors remained “attired in their day clothes”. Hitchcock enjoyed his tussles with the PCA which he likened to “the thrill of competitive horse trading.” It helped that a more enlightened examiner Geoffrey Shurlock had taken over after Joseph Breen retired through ill health. Much like the long-term Secretary of the BBFC John Trevelyan, he was more lenient to directors he admired.

In a classic Hitchcock cut, Eva Marie Saint, dangling from Mount Rushmore by Cary Grant’s hand is then hauled into the sleeping compartment of the train on which they first met. This was accompanied by the overdubbed line  “Come along,  Mrs. Thornhill” to assure America that what the couple was about to do was sanctioned by marriage.

The line had been suggested by Geoffrey Shurlock, who also recommended that the angle between the now married couple never dipped below the regulation 45 degree angle, as they relaxed back onto the bunk. So Hitchcock cut the shot at that point, before the lovers became fully horizontal as publicity shots of the scene indicate. With the negotiated adjustments made, the PCA gave North By Northwest its seal of approval. But Hitchcock had one more card to play, a covert chuckle for the cognoscenti. In the shooting script, the next and final shot of the
movie was described “ towards the back of the observation car as the train rolls off into the night.”

In March 1959, with a premiere date of July 1st looming, Hitchcock sketched what he wanted to see in the frame, and sent a pick-up crew to get a replacement shot, one of the train plunging into a tunnel.

Thus Alfred Hitchcock achieved metaphorically the most explicit depiction of the sexual act ever pulled off under the Production Code.

The sardonic humor of Hitchcock’s publicity gimmick for his next picture reflects his increased confidence in operating outside the box. During post-production for North by Northwest, Hitchcock ordered several reshoots and pick-up shots, which caused studio chief Sol Siegel to barrage him with memos to stop expanding the budget, which had climbed 25% to $4.3M. Siegel thought the picture too long. The 130 minute running time meant theaters could lose one session per day, resulting in reduced box office. He took the matter to the MGM board who happily sided with Hitchcock. North By Northwest, took $6M in US rentals, and strong international grosses, his biggest hit in years, solidified Hitchcock’s Hollywood clout. He had the power to make any film he chose.

The reason he chose Psycho, in my view, was that it was the perfect vehicle to challenge the PCA’s restrictions on a number of issues. He could make it inexpensively ($800,000) in black and white, using the crew of his hit TV show The Alfred Hitchcock Hour. The script of Psycho was a minefield of Code taboos: immoral behavior, insanity, sexuality, voyeurism, transvestism, matricide, plus graphic murders with a big knife, all areas of fascination for Hitchcock, who
sensed the time was right to push the envelope on violent death. But he knew bright red blood would spook the PCA, hence his decision to shoot in black and white as well as its cost saving. He had developed a good relationship with Geoffrey Shurlock, a more sophisticated man than his predecessor and a genuine film lover. I suspect he was privately amused at the way Hitchcock snuck a sexually suggestive image into North By Northwest. Hitch had confidence he could get his expressionistic treatment of the shower murder and opening semi-clothed adulterous love scene through the PCA, with minimal nips and tucks.

In an interview Janet Leigh recalled: “ He told me how all along he planned to manipulate the censors by deliberately putting in things so bizarre he could come back to them and say ‘tsk ‘tsk, alright, I’ll take that out but you’ve got to give me this.” He shot profanity (three ‘damns’, two ‘hells’, and an irreverent ‘God’) and some suggestive dialogue that had been flagged in script review so he could make a show of removing it as a concession. His masterful navigation of Psycho’s censorship process is laid out in detail in the afore mentioned John Billheimer book Hitchcock and the Censors so I will just hit on the points that impressed me.

His handling of Norman Bates’ voyeurism, regarded as sexual perversion under the Code, was a classic bait and switch move.  When Janet Leigh removes her bra viewed through a peephole by Norman Bates. The intention was to shock the examiner with a clear violation, make the nudity the focus of his attention, rather than the eye of the peeper.

After earnest pleas, Hitchcock made the great concession to replace the offending shot with one in which she walks to the shower, having put on her robe, a cover shot he already had in his back pocket. The distracted examiners ignored the extreme close ups of Norman’s eye, which offered the audience their own voyeuristic experience: to imagine what Norman Bates saw through the peephole between the time Marion Crane was in her bra and half slip (1st. POV) and
the time (2nd POV) in her robe.

Hitchcock was also able to break the rule against showing toilets or the sound of their flushing. The Breen regime had discouraged scenes involving bathrooms, and showing a privy was absolutely verboten! Merely referring to an off screen toilet, as a “thingummy,” was forbidden in his 1938 comedy thriller The Lady Vanishes. But Robert Bloch’s book, on which the film was based, has Marion Crane spending the night in a small motel room where the sight of the toilet past the bathroom door was inevitable. Hitchcock successfully claimed the location was vital to the plot, as was the scene where Marion Crane flushes her calculations of the stolen money down the toilet. It was a sound previously unheard in American theaters. Hitchcock argued that it signaled her remorse, and the surviving scrap of paper becomes an important clue. OK, Hitch, the commode stays in the picture. No longer was there a room in the house off limits to film makers. Hitch highlighted his little triumph in his droll pre-release trailer. knowingly turning to the camera to utter the word “Bathroom”.  Check it out on YouTube:

Under the rules of the previous Breen regime, no character could be a “transvestite”, nor could such a word be used in dialogue. OMG! People might ask what a transvestite was! And then what would happen…? Breen’s thinking was that by eliminating words describing perceived aberrations from popular culture, such behaviors would die out. But, Hitchcock argued, how else can we give the audience proper understanding of Norman’s behavior, wearing his mother’s clothes whenever she took over his personality, if we cannot use medical terminology? He and Stefano won the day by citing a dictionary definition of the word “transvestite” does not necessarily imply sexual deviancy. The word was allowed.

Violence was going to be his biggest challenge. This motivated his decision to shoot the movie in black and white, understanding the visceral response of both censors and public to the sight of bright red blood draining from the victim.

In the killing of Arbogast, Hitchcock reduced the number of stabs at the bottom of the stairs to one, protecting the slashed face at the top of the stairs.

 

Marion Crane’s murder in the shower took Hitchcock 7 days of his 36 day schedule to shoot. The only shots of Janet Leigh were the ones that clearly showed her face. In all the other shots, she was doubled by a pin-up model Marli Renfro, whose body was a perfect match for Janet Leigh.

There’s an exhaustive study of the shower sequence in the documentary 78 Shots/52 Cuts, as well as in Billheimer’s book Hitchcock and the Censors. I’m not going to get into the weeds of it here. Suffice to say Hitchcock chose a daring strategy for his end game.

The PCA stated that the blizzard of shots, “ some impressionistic, some completely realistic of the girl’s nude body” was clearly  “ in violation of the Code” which prohibits nudity “in fact or in silhouette”. Of the five examiners at the screening, three were convinced they had seen nudity, two were not. The PCA instructed Hitchcock to remove the nudity. Hitchcock promised to do his best.

He sent the sequence back without changing a single frame. This time the two who hadn’t seen nudity now did, and the three who had seen nudity now did not. A week of debate as to who had seen what ensued.

Previously belly buttons had been forbidden on screen. In order to get a PCA Seal, Beach Party movies ensured that the bottom half of their bikini-clad girls covered this provocative aspect of the female anatomy. The PCA ignored the offending belly button, in favor of focusing on “ penetration” of the body by the knife. But Hitchcock explained that the shot was created by placing the knife against the waist of Janet Leigh’s body double and jerking it back out of frame. The film was then reversed to gives the effect of a stab but, Hitchcock insisted there was no actual close up of a penetration by the knife, a violation of the human body forbidden for movie audiences to see. Yet in their imagination they saw it, as Hitchcock intended.And a precedent was set for belly buttons in close up.

Another serious issue was the opening post-coital bedroom scene: bare chested John Gavin with Janet Leigh in bra and half-slip evidently having an adulterous affair; fully on a bed, what’s more, not with one foot still on the floor, as per traditional Breen rules. The lovers were “entirely too passionate”. The PCA wanted it re-shot with less passion and exposed skin.

Hitchcock counter offered: he would take out all the nudity from the shower sequence if he could keep the opening sequence as is. The PCA refused. Hitchcock countered again. If the Code would allow him to keep the shower sequence as is, he would reshoot the opening scene, on condition the PCA sent a representative to the set to identify anything objectionable. This put the PCA in a potentially embarrassing bind. They chose not to send anyone to the set on the day of
the designated re-shoot. So Hitchcock kept the scene as he shot it.

He then gave the PCA one last concession: the high wide angle of the shower after the murder. The camera craned up to the same angle as this earlier shot. It showed Janet Leigh’s double slumped across the rim of the bathtub, her bare buttocks distantly exposed.

Hitch pleaded for it as an emotion charged button on the scene, emphasizing the vulnerability of the victim. But he sacrificed it to break the deadlock. Psycho got its Seal. The Legion of Decency stopped short of “C – Condemned” perhaps out of deference to its sister censor and Hitchcock’s popularity with the media. They gave it a “B- morally objectionable in part for all.”

Many in Hollywood felt Hitchcock should have made another star driven comedy thriller like North by Northwest rather than a tawdry low budget serial killer movie. Paramount particularly felt Psycho would fail. And the film conflicted with the studio’s image with its new line of family friendly musicals. Hitchcock and his brilliant agent Lew Wasserman took advantage of their nervousness and offered a new deal.

Hitchcock would take over as the producer, and be responsible for any budget overages. Paramount would remain the distributor. Hitchcock would waive his $250,000 fee in return for 60% ownership of the negative until Paramount earned a set amount of money from a guaranteed percentage of the gross. Once Paramount realized the agreed figure, then all revenue and ownership rights would revert to Hitchcock, while providing an adequate guaranteed profit for Paramount on a picture they had no confidence would be a money spinner. Hitchcock’s sense of what audiences were looking for told him otherwise. He created a novel publicity campaign to heighten intrigue, issuing instructions, in his customary dry tone, to theater owners as to how to manage his mandate that no one be admitted after the movie started.

Theater owners who had been unhappy with Hitchcock’s publicity gimmick soon stopped complaining as every session filled. How much those Paramount executives must have regretted their decision to eliminate the studio’s risk when Psycho opened with queues round the block.

Psycho grossed $9.6M in its US initial release, earning $6M in overseas theatrical. Re-releases, home video and television sales were yet to come. Over time Hitchcock’s $800,000 movie made him millions. But Psycho gave ammunition to critics of Hitchcock’s fascination for the dark side of human behavior. Esquire magazine writer Dwight McDonald wrote of the film as “ the reflection of an unpleasant mind, a mean, sly, sadistic little mind.” Hitchcock’s subsequent biographers provide anecdotal evidence of the less attractive side of his character. But I don’t care if Hitch was not a paragon of virtue. I watch his movies enthralled by his mastery of technique, fascinated by the common thread of his  obsessions.

Hitchcock would echo Psycho’s publicity gimmick, but not mandate it, with his next production. The Birds would cause him no censorship problems. By 1963 Hammer’s Dracula, Frankenstein, and Werewolf remakes had made a polite level of Technicolor blood acceptable.

How about those jump cuts into the congealed pecked-out eye sockets? Another Hitchcock innovation in editing.

The real terror comes from the attack sequences.

The use of masses of live birds, enhanced by visual effects had never been done before. Throughout the location shooting, members of the crew were regularly pecked and scratched. Tetanus injections were instituted for all, including the cast before the scene in which a swarm of birds burst from the fireplace and attacked them.

Rod Taylor, Tippi Hedren, 9 year old Veronica Cartwright, and Jessica Tandy, along with camera crew and bird wranglers protected by thick rubber gloves, would all be trapped in a small set surrounded by netting to prevent the birds’ escape. In front of the crew Hitchcock sought to break the tension with his own style of ribald humor. He addressed venerable stage actress Jessica Tandy, the wife of Hitch’s old friend Hume Cronin, who were regular visitors at the Hitchcock home.

“ If one of these gets up your skirt, grab it! Because a bird in the hand…”

It took a moment to sink in, then they all laughed. Hitchcock sometimes whispered risque quips just before a take, to get a reaction from an actor that might stimulate a shift in mood or delivery. Hitch enjoyed being a sly provocateur. He dared to mock the commercials that played on his TV show. Sponsors complained to the network, but were quieted by the size of the ratings and their increase in sales.

It tickled Alfred Hitchcock, a master film maker, to be a defender of free speech, and a covert censorship saboteur, as John Billheimer puts it: “using misdirection, misinformation, hedged promises, and throwaway scenes to protect his visual creations. Often, he deliberately inserted outrageous dialogue or outlandish images in rough cuts as bait so they could be grudgingly surrendered in return for somewhat less outlandish images that he wanted to protect…We know what the censors kept out of Hitchcock’s films, but we’ll never know what an unfettered Hitchcock might have accomplished.”

Hitchcock is a fascinating universe to explore. Please read read the books on him from which I have quoted. They will enrich your next viewing of his work.

If you liked this article, check out my book Adventures in the B Movie Trade, available on barnesandnoble.com.